Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 09:12 PM Jun 2017

Trump misunderstood MIT climate research, university officials say

Source: Reuters

Massachusetts Institute of Technology officials said U.S. President Donald Trump badly misunderstood their research when he cited it on Thursday to justify withdrawing the United States from the Paris Climate Agreement.

Trump announced during a speech at the White House Rose Garden that he had decided to pull out of the landmark climate deal, in part because it would not reduce global temperatures fast enough to have a significant impact.

"Even if the Paris Agreement were implemented in full, with total compliance from all nations, it is estimated it would only produce a two-tenths of one degree Celsius reduction in global temperature by the year 2100," Trump said.

"Tiny, tiny amount."

--snip--

"If we don't do anything, we might shoot over 5 degrees or more and that would be catastrophic," said John Reilly, the co-director of the program, adding that MIT's scientists had had no contact with the White House and were not offered a chance to explain their work.

Read more: http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN18S6L0





"Tiny, tiny amount."

Trump talking about his penis again.
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump misunderstood MIT climate research, university officials say (Original Post) Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2017 OP
Nothing more lame than citing research BootinUp Jun 2017 #1
"I'm not a scientist, but ..." Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2017 #4
... Lucinda Jun 2017 #2
What a dolt. SHRED Jun 2017 #3
They had to say "misunderstood" to be diplomatic caraher Jun 2017 #5
Trump misunderstanding something? That's unpossible! n/t christx30 Jun 2017 #6
I see what you did there. Fantastic Anarchist Jun 2017 #10
It's unpresidented. progressoid Jun 2017 #14
Trump misunderstood - Full stop. Solly Mack Jun 2017 #7
He didn't "misunderstand" shit. He never read the thing. He just wants to repeal Obama's everything. Lil Missy Jun 2017 #8
Exactly,, the correspondents' dinner... pangaia Jun 2017 #11
This exactly! luvMIdog Jun 2017 #12
He doesn't understand? Quelle surprise! 6000eliot Jun 2017 #9
Misunderstood? Doubt it. He knew what he was doing Roland99 Jun 2017 #13
To even discuss whether he understood it implies that he read it. Crash2Parties Jun 2017 #15
tRump did not misunderstand his instructions from his ever-shrinking base. They are celebrating. .nt Bernardo de La Paz Jun 2017 #16
his only hope to have friends is to give a few pigs what they want mdbl Jun 2017 #17

BootinUp

(47,078 posts)
1. Nothing more lame than citing research
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 09:16 PM
Jun 2017

one doesn't understand, and therefore using the information for an unjustified purpose.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
4. "I'm not a scientist, but ..."
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 09:21 PM
Jun 2017

I wish people who say that, would end the sentence with, "... so, I'll defer to the scientists who actually know the subject matter," then sit down and shut the fuck up.

caraher

(6,278 posts)
5. They had to say "misunderstood" to be diplomatic
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 09:28 PM
Jun 2017

I think it's less that it was misunderstood, than an opportunity to introduce yet another "alternative fact" into the RW echo chamber.

Crash2Parties

(6,017 posts)
15. To even discuss whether he understood it implies that he read it.
Thu Jun 1, 2017, 11:48 PM
Jun 2017

He didn't. It's longer than a single page with eight or maybe ten bullet points.

Once again people are trying to imbue him with an intelligence and comprehension and even responsibility he simply does not possess.

He was told what to say, and he said it. Don't get me wrong, he's no innocent. He simply does not care about anything that does not move his interests forward and his interests are limited to his self-image and his properties.

mdbl

(4,973 posts)
17. his only hope to have friends is to give a few pigs what they want
Fri Jun 2, 2017, 06:36 AM
Jun 2017

Kochs, Ryan, McConnell, and the Heritage Foundation. He doesn't make decisions based on actual merit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump misunderstood MIT c...