Trump Slams 'Politically Correct' DOJ for 'Watered Down' Travel Ban
Source: The Daily Beast
President Trump on Monday slammed his own administrations travel ban as watered down and politically correct. He tweeted, The Justice Dept. should have stayed with the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C. Then, The Justice Dept. should ask for an expedited hearing of the watered down Travel Ban before the Supreme Court & seek much tougher version! The weekend attack in Londonin which seven people were killed and 48 others woundedseemed to be behind Trumps renewed passion for the ban, which would halt travel from six predominantly Muslim countries. The initial version of the ban included seven countries; Iraq was later omitted from the proposal. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals was the latest to uphold a nationwide injunction against the ban last month, saying the executive order drips with religious intolerance, animus, and discrimination. Trump capped the tweetstorm by also finally settling the debate over what to call the executive order, after he and his team for months refused to call it a travel ban. He posted, People, the lawyers and the courts can call it whatever they want, but I am calling it what we need and what it is, a TRAVEL BAN!
###
Read more: http://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-slams-politically-correct-doj-for-watered-down-travel-ban?via=desktop&source=copyurl
-------------------------------------------------------------
Trump Criticizes His Justice Department Over Watered Down Travel Ban
President wants DOJ to ask Supreme Court to review initial executive order
Posted Jun 5, 2017 7:37 AM
John T. Bennett
@John T. Bennett
President Donald Trump criticized his hand-picked Justice Department leaders on Monday, tweeting that they erred in asking the Supreme Court to review a watered down version of his order banning some Muslims from entering the United States.
On Thursday, the Justice Department formally asked the high court to allow a Trump-signed executive order banning entry for individuals from six Muslim-majority countries to be put in place. DOJ officials also requested that the justices determine whether Trumps entry policy is constitutional. Several lower courts have ruled against constitutionality.
In the wake of Saturday nights terrorist van and machete attack in the heart of London, the U.S. president took to social media almost immediately to push for his travel ban. He argued it would provide an extra level of safety.
Trump, who rises early and watches morning news shows, was back at it on Monday morning. The social media posts have been referred to by lower court judges, and some of the presidents top aides reportedly have counseled him to avoid the very kind of tweets he posted Monday morning.
He tweeted that Justice officials should have stood by the original Travel Ban, not the watered down, politically correct version they submitted to S.C.
- See more at: http://www.rollcall.com/news/politics/trump-criticizes-justice-dept-watered-down-travel-ban#sthash.ftf11dG3.dpuf
Thomas Hurt
(13,903 posts)in the campaign.
Even the one they abandoned exempted the states where Donnie had business interests.
The malignant narcissist is not getting his way.......he is angry, poor snowflake.
Zoonart
(11,844 posts)When does he start arresting judges and shutting down the courts?
Botany
(70,483 posts)Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
* Except for Islamic Nations that Trump does business w/such as Saudia Arabia and Azerbaijan.
bucolic_frolic
(43,115 posts)Clearly this is important to one of his central goals of suppression of civil rights on some level
Otherwise he'd drop it and let the courts play it out
keithbvadu2
(36,724 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)He is unhinged
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)SethH
(170 posts)does he have the number of someone in his DOJ, maybe he can call them. They have to take his call. Or have a meeting about it. He can make them come to meetings, they work for him.