Fox & Friends, Daily Mail Falsely Suggest James Comey Met With The New York Times
Source: Mediaite
by Ken Meyer | 9:17 am, June 23rd, 2017
Link to tweet
Fox & Friends aired a report on Friday about how James Comey visited The New York Times yesterday. The only problem is that, that does not appear to be true.
Foxs report was based on a Thursday article from Daily Mail which included pictures of Comey and his wife entering the building where the Times newsrooms are located. This initially created the impression that Comey was giving the paper an interview, one where he could possibly leak important news, or else, react to Donald Trumps tweeted admission that the president never taped him as previously suggested.
Link to tweet
The Daily Mails article was seized upon by a number of Link to tweet
" target="_blank">pro-Trump figures and media outlets, though it would seem that the presumptions about Comeys visit were incorrect. Multiple Times reporters pushed back against the original piece by saying that Comey never visited their offices, and that he actually showed up to attend a charity event at a different part of the building.
Read more: http://www.mediaite.com/online/fox-friends-daily-mail-falsely-suggest-james-comey-met-with-the-new-york-times/
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Fascists of a feather stick together
muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)About whom (specifically, the current Lord Rothermere's great grandfather) it was said:
"What the proprietorship of these papers is aiming at is power, and power without responsibility the prerogative of the harlot throughout the ages.
Baldwin was attacking the leading press barons of his day (Lord Beaverbrook and Lord Rothermere); the phrase was suggested by Baldwin's cousin Rudyard Kipling (17 March 1931), quoted in The Times (18 March 1931), p. 18."
https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Stanley_Baldwin
More on the first Lord:
"In the 1930s Rothermere used his newspapers to try to influence British politics, particularly reflecting his strong support of the appeasement of Nazi Germany, and his were the only major newspapers to advocate an alliance with Germany. For a time in 1934, the Rothermere papers championed the British Union of Fascists (BUF), and were again the only major papers to do so. On 15 January 1934 the Daily Mail published a Rothermere-written editorial entitled "Hurrah for the Blackshirts", praising Oswald Mosley for his "sound, commonsense, Conservative doctrine".[7]
Rothermere visited and corresponded with Hitler.[8] On 1 October 1938, Rothermere sent Hitler a telegram in support of Germany's invasion of the Sudetenland, and expressing the hope that "Adolf the Great" would become a popular figure in Britain."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Harmsworth,_1st_Viscount_Rothermere
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Jebus! Thanks for the info
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Republicans sure took good care of their hacker news buddies! Their main go to for hacking shit lived for decades in mansions in florida. Live-in a state where elections have been fucked with forever!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)and believe anything they say.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)They know both their reputations are going to slammed by the trumpettes. I hope they both ignore it or perhaps even use it to make their case.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)for his last 10 years of tax returns.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Mueller please don't forget the wife and kids cell phones. That 11 yr old always has a cell or a fidget in his hands when hes with Daddy.
These kind of people frequently use family members devices to hide their dealings.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)to russian banks is not illegal. It certainly would explain a lot. Don't you think?
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)maybe they can explain this piece of shit about this Murdoch rag:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/article/murdochs-scandal-the-essential-reads/
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/frontline/film/murdochs-scandal/
Better than meeting with the Russian Ambassador
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,290 posts)This is embarrassing (or should be)
Link to tweet
.@EdHenry: "I wonder what Comey was doing at the @nytimes. It's so odd he was wearing sunglasses"
A: Visiting a non-profit for abused kids
Link to tweet
Leghorn21
(13,522 posts)the NYT bldg. in broad daylight...yeah, no one would notice such a 007 move, eh?
Sneaky sneaky man!!!
Oh damn, and wearing sunglasses to boot!!
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)fake LOUSY-LIAR president- you Republicans had to Coup to get him elected!
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,265 posts)"asking for a friend" = "please give me a job, Great Master!"
broadcaster90210
(333 posts)nt
pnwmom
(108,955 posts)to go to the NY Times, and explains that the NY Times rents out space to a number of other buildings.
I don't know what the Fox reports says, but the Times article wasn't false.