Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 11:13 AM Jun 2017

GOP Sen.: Assessing O'Care Repeal Bill Depends On How You Define 'Better'

Source: Talking Points Memo



By MATT SHUHAM Published JUNE 23, 2017 10:12 AM

Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) expressed his support for the Senate Republicans’ Obamacare repeal bill Friday, although he told the hosts of “Fox & Friends” that he had yet to commit to voting for it.

Asked if the bill bettered the state of health care, Cassidy replied: “It depends on how you define ‘better.’”

“It eliminates the individual and employee mandate, people love that,” co-host Steve Doocy told Cassidy. “It gets rid of a lot of taxes. Ultimately it’s got to be cheaper and it’s got to be better. Is it?”

“It is cheaper, and it depends on how you define better,” Cassidy said. “Obamacare had bells and whistles on all of their policies.” The senator said Obamacare’s Essential Health Benefits — categories of services that insurers were required to cover — added “a small portion of the cost,” and that other things mandated by Obamacare “folks just couldn’t afford.”

Read more: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/bill-cassidy-senate-repeal-bill-versus-obamacare

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP Sen.: Assessing O'Care Repeal Bill Depends On How You Define 'Better' (Original Post) DonViejo Jun 2017 OP
Well, it's a known medical fact that people get better when they go to heaven dalton99a Jun 2017 #1
Fuck them all....this bill is all about $$$ to the haves and death to the poor, period. Moostache Jun 2017 #2
Who are they shilling for, anyway? Saviolo Jun 2017 #3
Big pharma Scarsdale Jun 2017 #9
"folks just couldnt afford" Bayard Jun 2017 #4
Hospitals are struggling as it is Scarsdale Jun 2017 #10
he talks and looks like a fucking moron Skittles Jun 2017 #5
So, for the Reeps, better means .. ananda Jun 2017 #6
It's not just the 24 + million... Blue Idaho Jun 2017 #8
Things will definitely get better... Blue Idaho Jun 2017 #7
It Is Not a Health Bill, It Is a Tax Cut to the Rich... TomCADem Jun 2017 #11

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
2. Fuck them all....this bill is all about $$$ to the haves and death to the poor, period.
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 11:44 AM
Jun 2017

They can soft-shoe and half-step around all they want, and their idiot base will snap to and lock step right along with them (until their insurance disappears and they die in poverty bitterly believing that their plight is the fault of some minorities in San Francisco).

I have had it with these morons. Let the poor ones who vote Republican out of spite, ignorance or religion die and be gone. I am no longer going to care more about their well-being and futures than they do...I have had it. You loves you some Trump tough talk and being manly? Fine. When you die, we will throw your corpse into a big open pit grave and maybe cover the body with lime - if the GOP wants to pay to keep the stench down...otherwise, into the pit you go to rot with the corpse of the rest of the 99% who the GOP does not give a fuck about...

For the people about to be killed off sooner than myself, I am sorry that we live in such a shitty country...I am actively looking for a new home in a better one...there's probably 15-20 in Europe alone that lap this shit hole now...

Saviolo

(3,282 posts)
3. Who are they shilling for, anyway?
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 11:59 AM
Jun 2017

“It eliminates the individual and employee mandate, people love that,” co-host Steve Doocy told Cassidy. “It gets rid of a lot of taxes. Ultimately it’s got to be cheaper and it’s got to be better. Is it?”


Which people love that? Oh, right, the people who are corporations and no longer have to provide group coverage. Yay corporate personhood once again. It gets rid of a lot of taxes? For who? Or right, wealthy people. Extremely wealthy people. The people who would barely notice a massive medical emergency in their pocketbooks. Not the people for whom a minor emergency could ruin them financially for life.

Once again the hyper-wealthy get a break and the poor and quickly-becoming-poor are kicked out the door. You know, the hyper wealthy would barely notice an increase in taxes big enough to fund Obamacare and provide medical coverage to millions who can't afford it, and then the hyper wealthy might not have to walk around in fear seeing guillotines in the eyes of everyone they see.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
9. Big pharma
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 02:39 PM
Jun 2017

has made BIG contributions to Addison McConnell, Orrin Hatch and several others. If this bill is so great, let's DEMAND that THEY have to enroll. They strip the working class of protections for healthcare, while they are safe and sound with their Cadillac insurance, subsidized by taxpayers. Take that away, what is good enough for us, should be good enough for them and their ill-gotten gains.

Bayard

(22,062 posts)
4. "folks just couldnt afford"
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 01:05 PM
Jun 2017

Seriously? And they're going to afford having NO insurance so much better? I expect bankruptcy filings because of medical bills are going to skyrocket.

Scarsdale

(9,426 posts)
10. Hospitals are struggling as it is
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 02:43 PM
Jun 2017

treating gunshot victims. Most have no insurance, but have to be treated. Imagine if EVERY patient comes in with no insurance? Hospitals will be closing. One doctor on TV earlier this week said the hospital he works at is millions of dollars in debt, treating victims of meth lab explosions who have no insurance. Pretty soon very few will be able to afford, or qualify (!) for insurance. Is STUPIDITY a pre-existing condition, since most so-called "representatives" suffer from that.

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
5. he talks and looks like a fucking moron
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 01:17 PM
Jun 2017

let me guess, the mandated items people "just couldn't afford" have something to do with maternity care

ananda

(28,858 posts)
6. So, for the Reeps, better means ..
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 01:35 PM
Jun 2017

.. death and suffering for 24+ million
and large tax savings for the rich.

Righteeoo

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
8. It's not just the 24 + million...
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 02:20 PM
Jun 2017

This atrocity will effect 100% of Americans. If you have employer provided health insurance, expect it to take a big drop in coverage and a big jump in co-pays. If you depend on Medicare or Medicaid, God help you.

Blue Idaho

(5,049 posts)
7. Things will definitely get better...
Fri Jun 23, 2017, 02:17 PM
Jun 2017

For the rich. If you are one of the 98% that don't qualify as "rich" you are fucked.

TomCADem

(17,387 posts)
11. It Is Not a Health Bill, It Is a Tax Cut to the Rich...
Sat Jun 24, 2017, 12:23 AM
Jun 2017

...that is financed by cuts in benefits to working class Americans.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GOP Sen.: Assessing O'Car...