Trump's election panel puts hold on voter data request
Source: Reuters
U.S. President Donald Trump's commission to investigate possible election fraud on Monday put a freeze on its effort to collect sensitive voter data from states in the face of growing legal challenges.
In an email, the panel's designated officer, Andrew Kossack, asked state elections officers to "hold on submitting any data," the commission said in court filings.
Several state elections officials confirmed receiving a letter from the panel stating that it would provide further instructions after a federal judge had ruled on a complaint filed by a watchdog group, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which is seeking a temporary restraining order.
Earlier on Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union sued the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, alleging violations of federal law requiring transparent government.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
POLITICS | Mon Jul 10, 2017 | 6:21pm EDT
By Julia Jacobs and Bernie Woodall
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-vote-idUSKBN19V29W
riversedge
(70,186 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,803 posts)and have it disbanded immediately.
diva77
(7,639 posts)which collects the same data and was up to 30 states last time I checked, and is run by Kobach
Igel
(35,296 posts)Kangs rule!
bucolic_frolic
(43,123 posts)only those voting for me should be registered and allowed to vote
This is the essence of democracy - the right to a free and fair ballot
and what could be fairer than voting for me?
Igel
(35,296 posts)"If you don't vote for my candidate"--which, by the way, always includes the 1sg--"then it's unfair, it's rigged it's crooked."
That's an evergreen. And just as the attractiveness of an Xmas tree requires some novelty, so also this evergreen grows wearisome to an on fogy. as it seems, such as I.
Hard to tell the difference between "they're bad" and "they're bad because they're not like me." (One's centered on a external worldview that's readily identifiable, one's egocentric. In case there's a question.)
ResistantAmerican17
(3,801 posts)Except sticking it to every American who disagrees with his deplorable *uck America policies!
Gothmog
(145,107 posts)Eugene
(61,862 posts)The Washington Post has more information:
Trump voting panel tells states to hold off sending data while court weighs privacy impact
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/trump-voting-panel-tells-states-to-hold-off-sending-data-while-court-weighs-privacy-impact/2017/07/10/c4c837fa-6597-11e7-a1d7-9a32c91c6f40_story.html
onecent
(6,096 posts)I thought one said Missouri...I SURELY HOPE NOT.
LeftInTX
(25,224 posts)The state didn't give them to Trump, just this jerk.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,389 posts)I guess that's like sending ***** a telephone directory. How secret was that information in the first place?
Does this proud patriot have a name? I'm sure he wants to share the pride.
Is he anonymous? Not for long. That's the kind of information that can be FOIA'ed.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...was so successful.
iluvtennis
(19,844 posts)anything through to what the "logical" (a word not in his brain) conclusion/what the consequences could be. Just like he recently did with that BS proposal to work with [our enemy] Russia to fight cyber hacking. And the pitiful thing about this, his minions still voted for the unfit and unqualified jackass.