Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 02:56 PM Jul 2012

Regulator Rebuffs Obama on Plan to Ease Housing Debt

Source: New York Times

Regulator Rebuffs Obama on Plan to Ease Housing Debt
By BINYAMIN APPELBAUM
Published: July 31, 2012 Comment

WASHINGTON – The independent federal agency that administers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac said once again on Tuesday that it would not let the mortgage finance companies offer debt forgiveness to homeowners, rejecting the entreaties of congressional Democrats and the Obama administration.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency's acting director, Edward J. DeMarco, said that offering debt forgiveness would not make a "meaningful improvement in reducing foreclosures in a cost effective way for taxpayers.” The Federal Housing Finance Agency said it had concluded after months of study that debt forgiveness might benefit up to half a million homeowners, but that the costs – including the cost to taxpayers – outweighed the potential benefits.


That has fueled criticism that the agency is seeking reasons to reject principal forgiveness even if the program appears to meet the requirements of the law.

“I just don’t understand why they’re applying this level of caution and scrutiny,” said Jared Bernstein, a former economic adviser to Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. “It strikes me as bad for homeowners, bad for taxpayers and bad for the macroeconomy.”





Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/01/business/us-agency-bars-fannie-and-freddie-from-reducing-principal.html?hp



Jared Bernstein's right, of course.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
1. Well, since the regulators aren't regulating banksters
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:02 PM
Jul 2012

I guess they need something to do to justify their existence.

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
2. But they ARE regulating banksters
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:10 PM
Jul 2012

They see their sole mission as regulating the continued profits being generated by the banksters, no matter what it does to the overall economy.

flpoljunkie

(26,184 posts)
3. DeMarco's the agency's acting director. Not sure why NYT calls him a 'regulator.'
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:18 PM
Jul 2012

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner has written him a letter asking today asking him to reconsider.

http://www.treasury.gov/connect/blog/Pages/tfg-letter-demarco.aspx

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. Who is DeMarco
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 04:25 PM
Jul 2012
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_DeMarco

President Obama chose North Carolina Banking Commissioner Joseph Smith to be DeMarco's successor Nov. 13, 2010, but DeMarco is still expected to play a key role in the agency.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/edward-j-demarco/gIQAK9StKP_topic.html

Republican obstructionist.

burnsei sensei

(1,820 posts)
4. I'd like to know why.
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:27 PM
Jul 2012
The Federal Housing Finance Agency's acting director, Edward J. DeMarco, said that offering debt forgiveness would not make a "meaningful improvement in reducing foreclosures in a cost effective way for taxpayers.”


He should be forced to defend his position publicly.
I don't think he can.

Vincardog

(20,234 posts)
5. Because "offering debt forgiveness " would force the banks to mark their assets to the market price
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jul 2012

That would expose the vast majority of them as BANKRUPT. They are following the rMoney and bush the lessor's plan of
Paying themselves BONUSES while bankrupting companies and stealing their assets.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
8. DeMarco should be replaced, and pronto
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 06:57 PM
Jul 2012

In case everyone's forgotten ... Obama is the fucking
PRESIDENT, the Decider-in-Chief.


Is not DeMarco and appointee? I'm not certain this
is true, but if he is an appointee, Obama should not
take this shit from him, like "oh he wouldn't let us
do the right thing. whatever." and just go home with
his tail between his legs.

Sheesh!!

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
12. **Snap** I totally forgot about the blovating Knuckle-draggers
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 10:39 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Wed Aug 1, 2012, 01:31 AM - Edit history (1)

in the GOP dominated House.

So I guess at least Obama tried.

They'd probably refuse to confirm anyone to the
left of Carl Rove?

Or maybe this is a seminal moment,
where Obama could work it to his
advantage, do some old fashioned
"horse trading" as LBJ used to say.

 

Crow73

(257 posts)
6. No need
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 03:59 PM
Jul 2012

There really is no need.
The banks cannot prove they own the house.
If they cannot prove ownership the debt in null and void.

 

crimson77

(305 posts)
9. Is Jared Bernstein the guy who told my guy VP Biden to say that the unemployment rate
Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:03 PM
Jul 2012

Last edited Tue Jul 31, 2012, 07:49 PM - Edit history (1)

would be under 8% after the 2009 summer of recovery? He sounds pretty bad at his job.

Edit: Sorry, I am especially snarky because the Red Sox didn't make any big trades.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Regulator Rebuffs Obama o...