Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,451 posts)
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 08:57 PM Jul 2017

Inmates At This Jail Get Shorter Sentences In Exchange For Getting A Vasectomy

Source: BuzzFeed News


Inmates can get out of jail 30 days early if they get a vasectomy or birth control implant.

Posted on July 20, 2017, at 7:27 p.m.
Brianna Sacks




Judge Sam Benningfield, who signed a standing order for the program.
Channel News 5


A jail in Tennessee is offering reduced sentences to inmates who voluntarily get a vasectomy or birth control implant in an effort to reduce the number of repeat offenders who can’t afford child support.

In what critics are calling unconstitutional and probably illegal, a new program enables inmates in White County, Tennessee, to get out of jail 30 days early if they undergo the birth control procedures.

Local judge Sam Benningfield, who conceptualized and signed a standing order permitting the program, told Channel News 5 that he hopes to break a "vicious cycle" of criminals who keep coming into his court room, struggling to find a job and unable to afford child support.

“I hope to encourage them to take personal responsibility and give them a chance, when they do get out, to not to be burdened with children,” Benningfield said. “This gives them a chance to get on their feet and make something of themselves.”

Read more: https://www.buzzfeed.com/briannasacks/tennessee-jail-inmate-birth-control-procedures?utm_term=.geZV6XnBx#.sdgeZv13Y

68 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Inmates At This Jail Get Shorter Sentences In Exchange For Getting A Vasectomy (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jul 2017 OP
Jesus. NT enough Jul 2017 #1
What fucking century do we live in? EarthFirst Jul 2017 #2
One in which there are still far to many people willing to either impregnate cstanleytech Jul 2017 #5
Yes! Glad you said it. Although I'd say a century ago people were MORE responsible. 7962 Jul 2017 #9
Nah, people are people still and you still had children that were abandoned in orphanages or cstanleytech Jul 2017 #13
It must have been a real struggle. I hate hearing those stories. I was lucky. 7962 Jul 2017 #18
Aye it sucked but what angers me is that the Navy refused to even help and I will never forgive them cstanleytech Jul 2017 #38
Regardless, using the criminal justice system to sterilize people is a fucking terrible idea Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #32
Birth control implants are not permanent and depending on the method used neither are vasectomies. cstanleytech Jul 2017 #36
I think it's a bad way to go about it. Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #39
No, they were using prison to punish them for not taking responsability for providing for their cstanleytech Jul 2017 #40
Im not saying dont punish deadbeat or non-supportive parents Warren DeMontague Jul 2017 #43
And I get that but its not working. The number of children with dead beat parents isnt cstanleytech Jul 2017 #44
Your argument is the end justifies the means Major Nikon Jul 2017 #45
If you can find a better way that actually works to get these people to live up to their obligations cstanleytech Jul 2017 #55
How does getting a vasectomy work for previous obligations? Major Nikon Jul 2017 #57
It doesnt of course but it does it does prevent them from creating new ones to add to the old. nt cstanleytech Jul 2017 #59
Throwing them from a helicopter screaming would probably be even more effective Major Nikon Jul 2017 #60
Yeah... you're justifying this program. LanternWaste Jul 2017 #49
Vasectomies can sometimes be reversed, but not always Zing Zing Zingbah Jul 2017 #48
a . . . "terrible idea" lebkr Jul 2017 #47
We live in the 1200s. Didn't you notice? Kablooie Jul 2017 #61
Why doesn't he help them find a job? secondwind Jul 2017 #3
For some a job wouldnt matter as they would still skip out on paying even if they had one. cstanleytech Jul 2017 #7
How the hell is that legal? Docreed2003 Jul 2017 #4
It isn't. A landmark Supreme court decision in "Buck vs, Bell" 1927 dixiegrrrrl Jul 2017 #23
This is in the same vein SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #29
Buck v Bell dealt with state-sponsored INVOLUNTARY sterilization. no_hypocrisy Jul 2017 #52
Stay in jail or submit? SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #64
There is no choice. You lose your hearing, you get sterilized. no_hypocrisy Jul 2017 #65
I misunderstood your earlier post SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #67
Was thinking the same thing actually about racial motivation Docreed2003 Jul 2017 #34
WTF!!! blue-wave Jul 2017 #6
The Nazi eugenics programs were in turned influenced by the early American eugenics movement ansible Jul 2017 #8
A birth control implant is no where near like what the Nazi's did back then or for that matter cstanleytech Jul 2017 #10
It's still very concerning blue-wave Jul 2017 #16
I agree that such a program needs to be monitored "very" closely because it could be abused cstanleytech Jul 2017 #25
I guess that would include the guy who blue-wave Jul 2017 #30
There is a difference of being unable and unwilling. cstanleytech Jul 2017 #35
Glad you are comfortable SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #31
Its not an issue of who gets to reproduce if that was the case then we would cstanleytech Jul 2017 #37
watched by whom? SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #63
I am not appointing myself anything I am merely speaking my opinion one based around cstanleytech Jul 2017 #66
Sorry for your circumstances growing up SCantiGOP Jul 2017 #68
Should be a condition of release for rapists & child molesters. nt 7962 Jul 2017 #11
A vascectomy Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #14
Oops, thats right. Should've said castration. 7962 Jul 2017 #17
that's not the point Demonaut Jul 2017 #20
Well, the poster in post #11 Mr.Bill Jul 2017 #22
Wait a minute here. It's voluntary, and you're rewarded truthisfreedom Jul 2017 #12
It is, by definition, coercion. LanternWaste Jul 2017 #50
Voluntary, free, and reduced sentence, why not? IronLionZion Jul 2017 #15
Please see my post above, # 23. Not voluntary. n/t dixiegrrrrl Jul 2017 #24
Not a bad idea, it can be reversed Demonaut Jul 2017 #19
Seriously what the fuck is going on in this country Egnever Jul 2017 #21
Or: "Inmates who refuse steralization get longer prison sentences." David__77 Jul 2017 #26
I must make two points. Doreen Jul 2017 #27
There was a program in California Phoenix61 Jul 2017 #28
There are people who really should not radical noodle Jul 2017 #41
This is the implant which wears off after about 4 years plus they are not being paid for it per se cstanleytech Jul 2017 #42
I agree n/t TexasBushwhacker Jul 2017 #62
This makes me uneasy. Shoonra Jul 2017 #33
Buck v Bell is the law of the land. AngryAmish Jul 2017 #58
White county Tenn? maxrandb Jul 2017 #46
What happens if they land back in jail after the vasectomies and they want to no_hypocrisy Jul 2017 #51
I don't think it should necessarily be a bribe, but.... Rorey Jul 2017 #53
So the only way to get free birth control in this country will be to go to prison first? elehhhhna Jul 2017 #54
I guess we now never have to endure any more Malthusian bullshit on DU. Dreamer Tatum Jul 2017 #56

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
5. One in which there are still far to many people willing to either impregnate
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:11 PM
Jul 2017

or become pregnant and have children that they wont take responsibility for and help raise or cannot afford to raise or in other words it isn't that much different than prior centuries.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
9. Yes! Glad you said it. Although I'd say a century ago people were MORE responsible.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:19 PM
Jul 2017

But be ready to be called names for your on-point statement

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
13. Nah, people are people still and you still had children that were abandoned in orphanages or
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:26 PM
Jul 2017

on the streets back then as you do know.
Mind you such a program "could" be abused but if its purely limited to people that are having children that they cannot afford to raise and or simply refuse to provide for then I am not going to complain much being as I have direct experience on what its like to grow up with a deadbeat father and having a mother struggling to simply buy even bread.

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
18. It must have been a real struggle. I hate hearing those stories. I was lucky.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:47 PM
Jul 2017

Grew up a military brat. Had both parents.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
38. Aye it sucked but what angers me is that the Navy refused to even help and I will never forgive them
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:10 AM
Jul 2017

nor my father for what they put my mother through.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
32. Regardless, using the criminal justice system to sterilize people is a fucking terrible idea
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:51 PM
Jul 2017

with a barbaric history.

I'm sure there are better ways to encourage responsibility than using the leverage of incarceration. Strikes me as a terrible idea, not to mention the obvious implications that fall out from the known racial disparities in who ends up in jail.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
39. I think it's a bad way to go about it.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:28 AM
Jul 2017

You are using prison to coerce people not to reproduce, that's the problem.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
40. No, they were using prison to punish them for not taking responsability for providing for their
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:54 AM
Jul 2017

children they already have like they should be doing as parents.
Granted some of the the people might have a legitimate reason for not supporting their kids however if thats the case it makes zero sense to go and make more children and repeat the cycle again and again of not supporting the new ones either.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
43. Im not saying dont punish deadbeat or non-supportive parents
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 01:01 AM
Jul 2017

Im saying dont use prison as a carrot or stick to push sterilization - 'temporary' or no - on inmates.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
44. And I get that but its not working. The number of children with dead beat parents isnt
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 01:07 AM
Jul 2017

declining so something needed to be done and this might be wake up some of them need since the threat of prison clearly hasnt been working.

Major Nikon

(36,818 posts)
45. Your argument is the end justifies the means
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 05:34 AM
Jul 2017

This isn't that great of an argument to begin with and much worse so when the application is civil rights. It's actually the same argument used to justify public caning and amputations for misdemeanor level offenses. Just because a method of punishment is effective, does not ethically justify its use.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
55. If you can find a better way that actually works to get these people to live up to their obligations
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:39 AM
Jul 2017

as parents I will get behind it 100% over this.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
49. Yeah... you're justifying this program.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 09:28 AM
Jul 2017

Yeah... you're justifying this program predicated on zero data as to the results. Sounds about right.

Zing Zing Zingbah

(6,496 posts)
48. Vasectomies can sometimes be reversed, but not always
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 08:02 AM
Jul 2017

and I'm sure that is an expensive procedure. There are also side effects to the vasectomy, like pain that can last for quite some time.

lebkr

(39 posts)
47. a . . . "terrible idea"
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 07:56 AM
Jul 2017

This is about the Christian attitude about punishment. It's always about the punishment . . . . and feeling superior. No thought given to the economy, opportunities, stable communities, etc. which would actually improve lives.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
7. For some a job wouldnt matter as they would still skip out on paying even if they had one.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:15 PM
Jul 2017

My father did the same thing, my mother knew he was working but not where exactly or where he was living in the country to help support my brothers and myself and the Navy which knew where he was of no help to my mother in tracking him down to serve him with said support papers nor would they forward the papers to him.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
23. It isn't. A landmark Supreme court decision in "Buck vs, Bell" 1927
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:10 PM
Jul 2017

Involuntary sterilization applies to coercion. Offering decreased prison sentences is a form of coercion.

I am curious as the race of the majority of the prisoners, that might add to the illegality of this.

no_hypocrisy

(46,038 posts)
52. Buck v Bell dealt with state-sponsored INVOLUNTARY sterilization.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 09:41 AM
Jul 2017

Carrie Buck had to be put in front of an advisory panel, deemed "feeble-minded" and then had to go to Amherst County Court House to reverse the decision of the Board to have her sterilized. She fought to keep her right to reproduce.

In this case, although one can argue that the subjects are partially compelled to make the choice of being sterilized, it's deemed voluntary and an exchange of favors. Completely different from having no vote altogether to be sterilized.

no_hypocrisy

(46,038 posts)
65. There is no choice. You lose your hearing, you get sterilized.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 06:27 PM
Jul 2017

Once Buck made state-sponsored, compulsory sterilization legitimate, states went wild with wholesale sterilizations. Sometimes, they didn't tell the subjects they were being sterilized; they were told their appendixes were being removed, etc. Years later, they married and couldn't understand why they couldn't start a family.

Docreed2003

(16,850 posts)
34. Was thinking the same thing actually about racial motivation
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:53 PM
Jul 2017

I thought I remembered a landmark case about forced or coerced sterilization of inmates, thanks for sharing!

blue-wave

(4,344 posts)
6. WTF!!!
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:15 PM
Jul 2017

This too closely resembles Nazi sterilization programs in WWII. This is F'd up!!

So let's get everyone comfortable with the idea and program. Then who's next? We are being programmed into accepting things that, in a normal society, we never ever would accept.


cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
10. A birth control implant is no where near like what the Nazi's did back then or for that matter
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:20 PM
Jul 2017

what we ourselves did in certain parts of the country to people as the procedures they used back then were not reversible but the implant is reversible and yes even a vasectomy can be reversible depending on which method they use.

blue-wave

(4,344 posts)
16. It's still very concerning
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:38 PM
Jul 2017

because of this:

So let's get everyone comfortable with the idea and program. Then who's next? We are being programmed into accepting things that, in a normal society, we never ever would accept.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
25. I agree that such a program needs to be monitored "very" closely because it could be abused
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:28 PM
Jul 2017

but on the other hand if it prevents assholes that refuse to help support their children from having more children that they can screw over in life I am not going to complain to much.

blue-wave

(4,344 posts)
30. I guess that would include the guy who
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:44 PM
Jul 2017

loses his job because of right-wing policies such as the great depression, the Bush "great recession" or what's to come with Trump's time in office. He is doing a great job of bringing all those jobs back to America after all!!

So anyone down on their luck with kids and child support, watch out!! We're coming to neuter (or spay?) you! No need to consider individual cases. You're all just as guilty as the next! My question again: Who's next?

We need to start building a society that, once again, affords men and women the opportunity to raise children in a safe and healthy environment. That means good paying, living wage jobs. And this idea is just a start. Sterilization programs should not even be part of the equation in OUR country.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
35. There is a difference of being unable and unwilling.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:02 AM
Jul 2017

If you are unable but you are making an honest effort to be as good a parent as possible under the circumstances then sure the courts should be willing to work with you but if your an asshole who simply refuses to help provide support even though you could do it then I dont have much sympathy.

SCantiGOP

(13,866 posts)
31. Glad you are comfortable
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:47 PM
Jul 2017

In deciding, or at least endorsing, who gets to reproduce and who doesn't.
I'm not.

On edit: blue-wave, I agree with your post. My response was to #25

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
37. Its not an issue of who gets to reproduce if that was the case then we would
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:06 AM
Jul 2017

be a society where you would have to be granted permission beforehand this is simply aimed at those that have reproduced and that refuse to support the children they already have, granted it could be abused in that way but thats why it needs to be very carefully watched.

SCantiGOP

(13,866 posts)
63. watched by whom?
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 06:14 PM
Jul 2017

apparently you are appointing yourself as one of those who are qualified to make these decisions.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
66. I am not appointing myself anything I am merely speaking my opinion one based around
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 06:27 PM
Jul 2017

growing up with a deadbeat father and one who saw his own mother have to struggle just so we literally would have a loaf of bread to eat for the entire week until next months food stamps came in.

SCantiGOP

(13,866 posts)
68. Sorry for your circumstances growing up
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 06:41 PM
Jul 2017

But that in no way justifies giving the government a power like this under any circumstances. It would be like the death penalty - it would inevitably end up discriminating against the poor and minorities, and it is an abhorrent and unconscionable policy on the face of it.

truthisfreedom

(23,140 posts)
12. Wait a minute here. It's voluntary, and you're rewarded
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:21 PM
Jul 2017

Two ways. Apparently it's free, plus you get a reduced sentence. Obviously guys can only use this once, but what if a guy wants a vasectomy and has no health care and no money?

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
21. Seriously what the fuck is going on in this country
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 09:54 PM
Jul 2017

We seem to be on a downward spiral into ignorance.

Soon it will be witch trials again.

Doreen

(11,686 posts)
27. I must make two points.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:37 PM
Jul 2017

That is just so wrong though I bet some would support it if it were just women he was expecting to do that.

Phoenix61

(16,994 posts)
28. There was a program in California
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 10:37 PM
Jul 2017

several years ago that provided free tubal ligations for women plus $500. The money was intended to cover lost wages for time they would not be able to work while recovering. They had to stop the program due to concerns addicts were "selling" their reproductive rights. This will sound harsh but having worked with children born to addicts and alcoholics I'm not sure that was a bad thing.

radical noodle

(7,997 posts)
41. There are people who really should not
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 12:58 AM
Jul 2017

reproduce. Think of all the white supremacists in jail now. I sure wouldn't mind if they chose to do it.

cstanleytech

(26,247 posts)
42. This is the implant which wears off after about 4 years plus they are not being paid for it per se
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 01:00 AM
Jul 2017

rather they are being granted a little time off of their remaining sentence and frankly I think its a cheaper alternative than simply letting them continue to have children that they cannot or will not take care.
Or to put it another way people are focused so much on the people that this is being offered to that they are neglecting to consider the ones that are really being hurt which is the children by their parents being negligent by not helping to support them and not behaving like a parent should behave.

Shoonra

(518 posts)
33. This makes me uneasy.
Thu Jul 20, 2017, 11:52 PM
Jul 2017

This is not a repeat of Buck v. Bell -- there is no evidence that the prisoners or their children are or will be geneticially inferior. Statistically most prisoners are black, so the purpose of this legislation is to sterilize lots and lots of black men. The supposition is that the prisoners will return to prison, not particularly optimistic -- so sterilization is being pushed on the first offense.

Catholic prisoners will probably refuse sterilization - and be made to serve longer prison terms for adhering to their religion. Probably the same can be said for Orthodox and Hasidic Jews, Amish, and great many others with religious scruples about contraception. So there are serious Constitutional issues involved here. Unmarried men who come out of prison may have trouble forming long term relationships leading to marriage, since they cannot father children, and this may affect their chances at rehabilitation.

no_hypocrisy

(46,038 posts)
51. What happens if they land back in jail after the vasectomies and they want to
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 09:37 AM
Jul 2017

shorten their sentence of incarceration?


One trick pony.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
53. I don't think it should necessarily be a bribe, but....
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 09:45 AM
Jul 2017

It'd be great if birth control was free and easy to obtain (including vasectomies and tubal ligations). I also think that spaying and neutering pets should be free. JMO

Dreamer Tatum

(10,926 posts)
56. I guess we now never have to endure any more Malthusian bullshit on DU.
Fri Jul 21, 2017, 10:48 AM
Jul 2017

If this is so concerning, then all that handwringing about overpopulation is just bullshit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Inmates At This Jail Get ...