Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,361 posts)
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 01:31 PM Jul 2017

Senate panel rejects air-traffic control privatization

Source: USA Today

Senators who decide how much to spend on the Federal Aviation Administration rejected Tuesday the Trump administration’s proposal to privatize air-traffic control.

The Senate Appropriations subcommittee for transportation and housing approved by voice vote a $60 billion bill, with $16.7 billion for FAA.

The senators joined their House counterparts in rejecting a proposal to move controllers from FAA to a non-profit corporation. But the decision isn't final because the Senate and House must still debate and resolve their differences before spending decisions become final, months from now.

The air-traffic control proposal is a top priority for airlines, which want more predictable funding to modernize equipment and training faster, for more efficient flights. But opponents in the Senate and House spending committees, and among rural lawmakers, worry that the corporation will be controlled by airlines without public oversight through Congress.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/flights/todayinthesky/2017/07/25/senate-panel-rejects-air-traffic-control-privatization/508479001/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate panel rejects air-traffic control privatization (Original Post) brooklynite Jul 2017 OP
Kick Hekate Jul 2017 #1
That wad a disaster nipped in the bud! nt procon Jul 2017 #2
I like your typo.... Locrian Jul 2017 #3
Touche! I blame the dang cat. nt procon Jul 2017 #6
As a controller who vehemently disagrees with NATCA on this bluevoter4life Jul 2017 #4
And another long time billh58 Jul 2017 #10
Good jpak Jul 2017 #5
woo hoo! K&R secondwind Jul 2017 #7
With the amount of air travel in the U.S., it is preferrable to have the government run ATC. haele Jul 2017 #8
"Hey, boss! Acme Air Traffic Dynamics, LLC offered me a better deal! Aristus Jul 2017 #9

bluevoter4life

(787 posts)
4. As a controller who vehemently disagrees with NATCA on this
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 02:01 PM
Jul 2017

Good. If the airlines all support this, how can we honestly believe they have the nuances of the ATC and NAS systems in mind?

haele

(12,640 posts)
8. With the amount of air travel in the U.S., it is preferrable to have the government run ATC.
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 04:15 PM
Jul 2017

I know other countries don't, but with the sheer number of planes in the air over major U.S. cities, I'd be hard pressed to trust a corporation that "answers to shareholders" hire and run the control towers, even if there's a government agency that will be providing oversight.

I suspect that most of the Senators have experienced "prime travel time" at major airports. Can you imagine flying if the government was running privatized ATC like the Privatized Prison system is run?

Haele

Aristus

(66,294 posts)
9. "Hey, boss! Acme Air Traffic Dynamics, LLC offered me a better deal!
Tue Jul 25, 2017, 04:21 PM
Jul 2017

Give me a raise, or SW715 now on short-final goes into the tarmac nosefirst!"

That's what privatization would get us...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate panel rejects air-...