Trump threatens to end ObamaCare payments unless repeal passes
Source: MSN/The Hill
President Trump on Saturday threatened to end key payments to insurance companies made under Obamacare if a repeal and replace bill is not passed.
"After seven years of 'talking' Repeal & Replace, the people of our great country are still being forced to live with imploding ObamaCare!" the president wrote in a tweet.
"If a new HealthCare Bill is not approved quickly, BAILOUTS for Insurance Companies and BAILOUTS for Members of Congress will end very soon!" he added.
Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) fired back Saturday, saying Trump should "stop playing politics with people's lives and health care, start leading, and finally begin acting presidential." "If the president refuses to make the cost sharing reduction payments, every expert agrees that premiums will go up and health care will be more expensive for millions of Americans," Schumer said in a statement.
Read more: http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-threatens-to-end-obamacare-payments-unless-repeal-passes/ar-AAp1dLH?li=BBnb7Kz
And, if this does not work, perhaps he can threaten to default on the debt.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)What Schumer describes is exactly what Trump wants to have happen.
TomCADem
(17,382 posts)...he does have majority approval among certain demographic groups, so he must be doing something that they like.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I think that's what they seem to like - one or both categories.
Also, if one only watches Fox News, it seems like he is the best president ever.
turbinetree
(24,683 posts)Blah Blah, Blah................
He sounds like he's screeching and his tiny finger nails are being rubbed across a black board or screen
SunSeeker
(51,512 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)So how much does he REALLY care about that murdered girl? Enough to make sure she'd have health care, if she had lived?
He's desperate to get his hands on that money that's being used for health care for the disadvantaged. He needs it for tax cuts.
benld74
(9,901 posts)To come up with
1) something better
2) Fix ACA
They did neither
jpak
(41,756 posts)yup
groundloop
(11,513 posts)This is, unfortunately, potentially a winning strategy for repukes. There are enough uninformed people in this country that would have not idea that 45* forced their premiums to go up drastically and they'd blame the ACA. I've no doubt this is the tact that hardline repukes will take.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)the ACA rules stay the same - we get government subsidized healthcare including the cost sharing subsidy discounts based on income.
The payments covering these discounts would stop going to the insurers if Trump stops paying them.
Insurers would raise their premiums 20% to cover the Trump losses. Some insurers would leave the market, and we would have more uninsured Americans.
All in all, though, the subsidized increase paid by the government to the insurers would go up. Trump's "plan" to stop Cost Sharing would cost even more than paying it!
Although a number of our fellow American citizens would lose affordable healthcare because of the ongoing uncertainty insurers won't risk!
groundloop
(11,513 posts)Yes it would cost taxpayers more, but 45* doesn't give a shit about any of that. He's driven by a deep hatred of President Obama and anything associated with him.
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)largest contributor to the GOP. This issue will be resolved by November. Cigna and Anthem as well as Humana are looking for Mergers and if one thinks they are going to take a hit,forget about it.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)All on his own sign an executive order and too bad on the payments? Wouldn't that be illegal?
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)So, the executive branch voluntarily paid it.
A federal judge sided with the Republicans who claimed the money should come out of legislative budget funding - but let it stay in place until Congress resolved the issue.
With 'repeal and replace,' Congress never took it up one way or the other.
Yes, Trump can "kill" the payments - and that will be on his head alone now.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)Not a doubt about it. I guess we can expect the higher premiums and dropped coverage to get worse by the month now. Lovely.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)It's one thing to have a 'replacement' - it's another to just hurt people out of spite and nastiness.
I think a number of Republicans in both houses of Congress have had about enough of this.
Mountain Mule
(1,002 posts)I don't think Paul Ryan will ever get his fill of spite and nastiness. No doubt he is telling Trump to go for it even as we speak (or type on our keyboards).
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)I have learned to hope for the best, but expect the worst.
If I were Ryan, I'd be asking Trump why he couldn't deliver just one freakin' vote!
The House did their "job." For probably around the 70th time?
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,957 posts)... by veto-proof majorities.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,957 posts)not fooled
(5,801 posts)enough 'Muricans understand the connection between dump's vindictive actions and the increase in premiums. Which would require the snooze media doing their job of explaining the cause and effect. I'm not counting on them. Traditionally they obfuscate and provide cover when pukes make policy changes that hurt the peasantry. They've been getting away with it since raygun and keep winning elections, because the mediaduh either covers for them or outright lies (i.e. faux) and in general act like shills for the wealthy.
Now I remember this little chapter. . . but, still, ugh.
If he does this, we've got to make it very, very clear to voters that this is his fault. And also the Republicans, since they blocked that funding in the first place.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,957 posts)question everything
(47,434 posts)In January, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fl.) introduced a bill that would end an exemption enabling members of Congress and Capitol Hill staff to obtain employer contributions from the government to pay for plans on D.C.s small-business exchange, which the federal Office of Personnel Management in 2013 issued guidance to allow.
By blowing the whistle on this special deal concocted by OPM, we will make members of Congress better understand the burdens of ObamaCare, thereby incentivizing members to get to work on a good repeal and replace plan, DeSantis wrote then in a statement.
Heather Higgins, CEO of the conservative-leaning advocacy group Independent Womens Voice, wrote last week in a Wall Street Journal op-ed: Congress is essentially unaffected by the high costs of the ObamaCare exchanges because of a special exemption crafted under the Obama administration. Some subsidies obtained via D.C.s small-business exchange, the op-ed claimed, were worth as much as $12,000 annually.
While Trumps meaning was not entirely clear, it is possible he could direct OPM to rescind the ruling enabling the exemption, as a coalition of right-wing groups encouraged him to do in a July 21 letter.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-threatens-insurer-payments-health-183810351.html
====
Will this, then, convince them to start article of impeachment? The man is clearly deranged.
flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)dalton99a
(81,392 posts)bagelsforbreakfast
(1,427 posts)adigal
(7,581 posts)Trump is doing what Dems couldnt do: destroy the Republican party for decades.
Red Mountain
(1,727 posts)Democrats will make him own not paying the subsidies whether he likes it or not. Our hands are tied....in a good way.
Gut Obamacare and the subsidies go away anyway.
Yavin4
(35,421 posts)Trump? Default on debt? Come on. When has that ever happened?