Statement by Presidents George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush
Last edited Wed Aug 16, 2017, 12:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: ABC News/Evan McMurry
Link to tweet
No link yet.
After Charlottesville, both Bush presidents denounce hatred in all forms
Olivier Knox
Chief Washington Correspondent
Yahoo NewsAugust 16, 2017
Former President George H.W. Bush and former President George W. Bush, in a rare joint statement, declared Wednesday that Americans must reject hatred in all its forms in the aftermath of the white supremacist and neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Va.
America must always reject racial bigotry, anti-Semitism, and hatred in all forms, the father-son duo said in the statement, which was released by both their offices.
As we pray for Charlottesville, we are reminded of the fundamental truths recorded by that citys most prominent citizen in the Declaration of Independence: we are all created equal and endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, they said, in a reference to Thomas Jefferson. We know these truths to be everlasting because we have seen the decency and greatness of our country.
The combined message came a day after President Trump said there was blame on both sides in Charlottesville, where a young woman was killed when a white supremacist allegedly drove his car on purpose into a group of counter-protesters. The Unite The Right forces also clashed with so-called antifa counterprotesters. Some prominent Republicans have broken sharply with Trump, while white nationalists have cheered him on.
Joint statements from the Bushes are rare, though they have done at least one before in 2013, after former Massachusetts Gov. Paul Cellucci died, they released one, according to the elder Bushs office.
###
https://www.yahoo.com/news/charlottesville-bush-presidents-denounce-hatred-forms-154910912.html
HopeAgain
(4,407 posts)is weak and complicit. Period.
FakeNoose
(32,634 posts)They're quoting the Constitution, so that's good anyway.
Maybe next time they'll call out the real perpetrators.
irisblue
(32,969 posts)Off to Google for Carter & Clinton statements.
DURHAM D
(32,609 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)When are they going to name trump?
catbyte
(34,375 posts)Disappointing, but it figures.
Javaman
(62,521 posts)sounds normal.
Gothmog
(145,131 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,001 posts)The news snip at the end says "where a young woman was killed when a white supremacist allegedly drove his car on purpose into a group of counter-protesters."
Allegedly? There is video of it and there were a few hundred witnesses. There's no "allegedly" about it.
This is taking the "don't proclaim someone guilty in the press" thing a bit far. They didn't have to editorialize by calling him a racist POS, but he didn't allegedly run those people down. HE RAN THOSE PEOPLE DOWN WITH A CAR!
6000eliot
(5,643 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,001 posts)But, they don't have to. There is no law requiring it. And in this case, it's just silly.
UpInArms
(51,282 posts)If the article ... after the fact .... after charges have been filed ... does not use "allege", it can find itself in court for causing a mistrial ... as all the prospective jurors can say they have been influenced by what you have published
ProfessorGAC
(65,001 posts)The video is available internationally and has been shown on nearly every news outlet. One written version not saying alleged is not going to pollute a jury when the visual evidence is so readily available.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)Republicans all toe the same line.