Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,822 posts)
Wed Aug 23, 2017, 08:17 PM Aug 2017

U.S. erred in declining protections for remote grizzly bears: judge

Source: Reuters

SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - U.S. wildlife managers erred when they declined to list as endangered a small population of grizzly bears in the remote reaches of Idaho and northwest Montana, a federal judge has ruled in what conservationists on Wednesday hailed as a huge victory.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in 2014 determined the fewer than 50 grizzlies that roam the Cabinet Mountains and Yaak River drainage in the Northern Rockies were not in danger of extinction and did not warrant re-classifying as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act.

The Montana conservation group Alliance for the Wild Rockies sued, arguing the so-called Cabinet-Yaak population of grizzlies would go extinct unless U.S. wildlife managers tightened restrictions on logging, mining and other activities in bear habitat, all safeguards that would come with endangered status.

On Tuesday a federal judge in Missoula, Montana, sided with the conservation group in a ruling that found that the Fish and Wildlife Service had violated U.S. law in determining that the number of outsized, hump-shouldered bears in the Cabinet-Yaak ecosystem could reach a targeted recovery goal of 100 without added protections.

-snip-

#ENVIRONMENT AUGUST 23, 2017 / 6:22 PM / AN HOUR AGO
Laura Zuckerman


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-grizzlies-idUSKCN1B32NN

11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. erred in declining protections for remote grizzly bears: judge (Original Post) Eugene Aug 2017 OP
I like bears Angry Dragon Aug 2017 #1
I like them from a distance. But I am glad to see this report. riversedge Aug 2017 #3
Just Follow these Safety precautions central scrutinizer Aug 2017 #8
I love it! SergeStorms Aug 2017 #11
K & FUCKING R Doug the Dem Aug 2017 #2
Kick peacebuzzard Aug 2017 #4
Good! montanacowboy Aug 2017 #5
More bears, less big business greed, that's a good thing! nt procon Aug 2017 #6
Maybe that's why Colbert's biggest threat was always bears! Initech Aug 2017 #7
SAVE THE BEARS! Equinox Moon Aug 2017 #9
Some how they think they can safeinOhio Aug 2017 #10

SergeStorms

(19,187 posts)
11. I love it!
Thu Aug 24, 2017, 03:12 AM
Aug 2017

"We advise the outdoorsman to wear little noisy bells on clothing so as to give warning to any bears close by so you don't take them by surprise".
We also advise anyone using the out-of-doors to carry "pepper-spray" with him in case of an encounter with a bear."


"Grizzly bear shit has bells in it and smells like pepper".

If that's an actual sign, it's great! If it's just a joke, that's great too!

montanacowboy

(6,080 posts)
5. Good!
Wed Aug 23, 2017, 08:34 PM
Aug 2017

Lived there from 1968 to 1990 and again from 1995 - 2013. Hiked a lot of miles in the Cabinets and NEVER saw a Grizzly. I am glad to see this.

safeinOhio

(32,641 posts)
10. Some how they think they can
Wed Aug 23, 2017, 11:07 PM
Aug 2017

improve nature. Next they will call for the killing of all black bears in the area to help the grizzlies.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. erred in declining p...