Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 09:56 AM Aug 2017

US successfully tests missile interception in Hawaii

Source: The Hill




BY MAX GREENWOOD - 08/30/17 09:36 AM EDT

A U.S. warship successfully shot down a medium-range ballistic missile in a test off the coast of Hawaii Wednesday, the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said.

The USS John Paul Jones detected and tracked the missile, which had been launched from the Pacific Missile Range Facility on Kauai, before firing SM-6 guided missiles to intercept it, the agency said.

The test came two days after North Korea fired a intermediate-range ballistic missile over Japan, further escalating tensions between Washington and Pyongyang. The test near Hawaii marked the second time that an SM-6 missile intercepted a medium-range ballistic missile, according to the MDA.

MDA Director Lt. Gen. Sam Greaves said in a statement that the missile defense test was a "key milestone" for the military's Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense System, because it gives the naval component of the system an enhanced ability to intercept missiles in their terminal phase.

Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/defense/348518-us-successfully-tests-missile-interception-in-hawaii

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US successfully tests missile interception in Hawaii (Original Post) DonViejo Aug 2017 OP
What happens to the nuclear material in a warhead trusty elf Aug 2017 #1
Depends on how the missile's hit. Igel Aug 2017 #2
Thank you for your response. trusty elf Aug 2017 #3
Anti-missile systems are easy to . . FairWinds Aug 2017 #4
No mention of this on the news, in the paper, mahina Aug 2017 #5
And it is noteworthy that the Hyperpower (that's US) . . FairWinds Aug 2017 #6
The Marshall Islands have the Compact of Free Association with the US. tammywammy Aug 2017 #7
Yeah, that reminds me a lot of the . . FairWinds Aug 2017 #8

trusty elf

(7,383 posts)
1. What happens to the nuclear material in a warhead
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 10:04 AM
Aug 2017

if the missile is intercepted on re-entry into the atmosphere? Whatever the impact on the environment, that outcome has to be preferable to the missile hitting its target.

Igel

(35,296 posts)
2. Depends on how the missile's hit.
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 10:14 AM
Aug 2017

If the guidance system is the only thing affected, it flies. Most directions are "down". But that's sort of a tricky thing to hit all by itself.

If the propulsion system is affected, then it flies or falls, but mostly down.

The warhead itself is sensitive. But big hammer is very unlikely to make it go boom since all the bits of U or Pu need to fit together to produce uncontrolled fission. A big hammer would be much more likely to make the warhead either not function or to reduce the blast (or possibly, just possibly, spread it out a bit, which would reduce peak radiation levels and the blast radius).

Most likely the fissionable material would fall to the ground, and almost certainly in largish chunks or still in the warhead casing. Now, having a half-mile square or larger area contaminated by Pu or U would be a bad thing, but it's hard to find a circumstance, even if it fell in the middle of a major city, where it would be worse than having the bomb detonate over a major city. And the contamination is likely to be in larger pieces, making decontamination and clean-up in the event of a struck missile easier.

Of course, it might just fall into the ocean since most of the Earth's surface is ocean. We like to think of the oceans as teeming with life, and they are--but most of it is confined to continental shelves (and even then mostly near the coasts where waters are more often more nutrient-rich) or the top layers of water where photosynthesis is possible. In deeper water benthic zones don't have much life except around thermal vents.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
4. Anti-missile systems are easy to . .
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 10:24 AM
Aug 2017

defeat . . see Ted Postol and . .
http://www.businessinsider.com/north-korean-nukes-can-beat-the-us-missile-defense-system-2017-4

And like the military industrial complex in general, missile defense is rife with fraud and fakery.

Veterans For Peace

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
6. And it is noteworthy that the Hyperpower (that's US) . .
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 02:20 PM
Aug 2017

regularly fires missiles over and at the Republic of the Marshall Islands, but is
just horrified when NKorea does it to Japan.

But hey, at least we no longer actually explode nukes in the Marshalls.

Look up Atomic Veterans, and the radio-logical exposure of the Marshallese.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
7. The Marshall Islands have the Compact of Free Association with the US.
Wed Aug 30, 2017, 03:48 PM
Aug 2017

The US & Marshall Islands aren't in a hostile relationship like Japan & North Korea. The situations aren't comparable.

 

FairWinds

(1,717 posts)
8. Yeah, that reminds me a lot of the . .
Thu Aug 31, 2017, 11:41 AM
Aug 2017

Last edited Thu Aug 31, 2017, 01:54 PM - Edit history (1)

Greater East Asian Co-Prosperity Sphere

It's all about bribes and coercion - rather like the US bases
complex on Okinawa. And then there is Jeju Island

In all cases the locals hate the deals.

Go see "Nuclear Savage" showing that the US used
Marshall Islanders as experimental subjects (w/o consent)
during the nuke tests.

Veterans For Peace

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US successfully tests mis...