Chelsea Manning says she was denied entry to Canada
Source: Reuters
Chelsea Manning was turned back at the Canadian-U.S. border because she was convicted of espionage for passing information to Wikileaks, the former U.S. intelligence analyst said on Monday.
Manning told Reuters via direct message on Twitter that she drove up to the Canadian border in Lacolle, Quebec, on Thursday evening, planning to vacation in Montreal and Vancouver.
She said she was stopped at the border and detained overnight before being handed a report stating she was inadmissible on grounds of serious criminality, according to a picture of the report she posted online.
The offenses Manning was convicted of under the U.S. Espionage Act would equate to an indictable offence, namely Treason if committed in Canada, the report reads.
Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-canada-immigration-manning/chelsea-manning-says-she-was-denied-entry-to-canada-idUSKCN1C02OW
WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)to cross the Canadian border.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)WhiteTara
(29,699 posts)I don't know what it is now, but at one time when I cared, it was .60 on the dollar.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)It's not exactly cheap to vacation out of the country.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)I suppose it depends on what sort of vacation you had in mind, and where you were located.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)That part of the story is a little ridiculous anyway.
That's 46 hours of driving
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Google driving directions:
https://goo.gl/V4U7fX
So, yeah, if someone is entering Quebec from the US, saying they want to go to Vancouver, that's a little odd right there.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)tblue37
(65,269 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Because that would be another kettle of fish.
tblue37
(65,269 posts)vacation in Canada.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)I always had to have a regular job, so I like to pay attention for tips on how to make money and things like that.
But I doubt anyone will pay me for speeches and appearances.
Yo_Mama
(8,303 posts)I kind of sympathize with the Canadians on that one - they can hardly want a bunch of drunken Americans on their roads.
But that's the reality - no, she will not be allowed into Canada.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)FSogol
(45,464 posts)conviction.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,318 posts)riversedge
(70,174 posts)Passport. He was not driving. They let him in.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,318 posts)I'm not sure if it was a trigger from a computer or he answered a question.
My BIL was attending g a poker tournament and was turned away at the border for the DUI.
riversedge
(70,174 posts)Sgent
(5,857 posts)over 5 years old, you can get in, but you have to apply for a visa before you go -- rather than just give a passport at the border.
susanna
(5,231 posts)I have to show my Canadian birth certificate to ensure I am permitted to cross the border, because of my 10-year-old DUI.
EllieBC
(3,010 posts)Canadians with convictions aren't allowed into the US.
Nay
(12,051 posts)adjudication by a Canadian immigration judge and see if the entry denial can be overturned due to circumstances (for example, if it's been many years since conviction and you've kept your nose clean since then.)
The kicker is that right now, applying and getting the result of an adjudication takes almost a year. If you want to visit Canada in late 2018, send it in now.
That was the deal a few months ago when I checked for a relative who wanted to go to Canada with us on vacation.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)The procedure is linked to the page I posted.
Nay
(12,051 posts)sent to Manning; to me, it looks like the letter you would get as an explanation of why you were physically turned back at the border, as she was. This denial letter doesn't seem to refer to any application attempt. And, as I mentioned, the wait is about a year to process an adjudication request. It seems to be a big deal. Glad I don't have to go through it.
I took a second look at the link -- she would have to wait 5 years after the completion of her sentence to even apply to be admitted. I wonder if the fact that she was pardoned would have any effect on her admittance, or allow her to apply earlier than the 5 years?
Sgent
(5,857 posts)her sentence was commuted.
Nay
(12,051 posts)MrSmokeTooMuch
(2 posts)In a week, actually. I'm driving down to take in the scenery and see some new country. Also, I hate to fly!
I have a possession of a narcotic conviction from 1976 on my record but I'm going to take my chances.
I've been to Europe four times and the issue was never brought up. But recently I have been told that the United States of America, the most free country on the planet, frowns upon people like me... retired old farts who once upon a time had a used hash pipe in their denim jacket pocket while REO Speedwagon rolled with the changes on the car's 8-track.
Yes... I am coming to your country to corrupt your youth! Mwah-ha-ha-ha!!! The long game!
Could be a short trip.
Not Ruth
(3,613 posts)Pope George Ringo II
(1,896 posts)She became that by paying the price to do what she thought was right. This is part of that price. It's unfortunate, but she knew the package deal she was buying when she started that ball rolling.
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)rpannier
(24,329 posts)Convicted of felony means you cannot get in
Same with Japan
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)if youre not a citizen of a country, you dont have any inherent right to enter it.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)Yep
Skippy33
(27 posts)I respectfully disagree. I believe that many people fleeing poverty, crime, or, who are seeking their family, have an inherent right to enter a country. Just look at our southern border for proof.
melm00se
(4,988 posts)operate under the Marxist interpretation of borders.
NYC Liberal
(20,135 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)legally and that is own a piece of earth/dirt and not allow the human race to ever walk on that dirt.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)or corp, etc.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)person to be able to own a part of earth and forbid us from every stepping foot on it?
Marengo
(3,477 posts)From "stepping foot" on it? Please answer with a yes or no.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)What is preventing a rich person from buying and owning Waikiki Beach once the GOP changes the laws and allows such a thing?
They then charge you for admission to the property, does that make sense to you?
You are asking me a question that doesn't need answering. Any person who occupies a space and pays a rent, like for an apartment, has a right to prevent unauthorized access, which has NOTHING to do with owning dirt.
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)For a temporary amount of time you have the right to control who is on the property.
I dont know why people are so hesitant to admit to me that they AGREE with me that if the teaparty idiots got their way, eliminated ALL government basically and allowed corps or individuals to buy Yellowstone, Yosemite, Waikiki Beach, etc, that this would be bad.
So
a. admit that is something you dont want to see happen
b. then admit that allowing anyone to own EARTH is absurd
Marengo
(3,477 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Why dont you acknowledge what I said, that you agree with it?
Skippy33
(27 posts)Why would it not be inherent? Who gets to decide? If it's not an inherent right for immigrants to enter our southern border, would you be of the mind that they entered illegally?
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)It will, however, allow you to apply to DHS for a waiver. A pricey endeavour, and by NO means guaranteed.
Even said waiver is no guarantee; a border guard has a shocking amount of discretion and power. They can deny you entry if they don't like your face. My conversation with a border guard a couple of years ago:
"Where is it you'd like to go in the US?"
"I'm going down to Sea-Tac to pick up my wife."
"You mean that's where you'd LIKE to go."
brooklynite
(94,452 posts)She stands guilty as charged.