HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » Latest Breaking News (Forum) » DNC 'unity' panel recomme...

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:27 PM

DNC 'unity' panel recommends huge cut in superdelegates

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by NewHendoLib (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: Politico

A commission set up to help reform the Democratic presidential nominating process has voted to restrict the number of superdelegates as part of a slew of changes.

The Democratic Party’s Unity Reform Commission is recommending cutting the number of superdelegates by about 400, equal to a 60 percent reduction. Many of the remaining superdelegates would see their vote tied to the results in their state.
...

The recommendations will now go to the Democratic National Committee’s rules and bylaws committee, and then likely to the full 447-member Democratic National Committee for consideration sometime next year, where it will need two-thirds support to pass.

“It’s not going to be about 447 people, it’s going to be about millions of people and how they pick up this challenge and this path,” said Larry Cohen, the former president of the Communication Workers of America who was appointed to this commission by 2016 candidate Bernie Sanders.

Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2017/12/09/dnc-superdelegates-unity-commission-288634



Progress... See where it goes...

11 replies, 2012 views

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 11 replies Author Time Post
Reply DNC 'unity' panel recommends huge cut in superdelegates (Original post)
Baconator Dec 2017 OP
FBaggins Dec 2017 #1
shenmue Dec 2017 #2
LiberalFighter Dec 2017 #3
TomCADem Dec 2017 #4
lapucelle Dec 2017 #7
left-of-center2012 Dec 2017 #9
Yavin4 Dec 2017 #10
zentrum Dec 2017 #5
lapucelle Dec 2017 #8
lapucelle Dec 2017 #6
NRaleighLiberal Dec 2017 #11

Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:31 PM

1. Great

long time coming... though it could be a challenge this time around due to the large expected field

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:31 PM

2. That's kind of funny

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:39 PM

3. If votes of super delegates are tied to results of states

might as well do away with them.

Super Delegates are there 1) as a safety valve, 2) include elected officials and DNC members so they feel they are part of it.

Bernie Sanders also should not be allowed to appoint anyone to any committee in the DNC. He is not a party member.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:40 PM

4. If they can also get rid of caucuses as well...

It disenfranchises folks who can't take the whole day off to spend at a caucus. Also, it is just embarrassing when a caucus reaches a result that is different from the popular vote during the primaries as was the case in Washington.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomCADem (Reply #4)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:02 PM

7. The option of absentee voting for caucuses is one of the reforms.

Caucus raw vote tallies must be reported as well.

230,000 people participated in the Washington state presidential caucuses in March 2016.

1,300,000 voters participated in the non-binding Washington state presidential primary in May 2016.

It was through through the caucuses that delegates were awarded.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to TomCADem (Reply #4)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:09 PM

9. I favor doing away with primaries and just having a caucus

It's like the old town meetings of our founding fathers.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to left-of-center2012 (Reply #9)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:49 PM

10. Unless you cannot take time off from work. n/t

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:45 PM

5. Good. Hopefully

……making space for some new, younger and more diverse faces.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to zentrum (Reply #5)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:03 PM

8. And for voters who can't avail themselves of the priviledge of caucus voting.

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 09:51 PM

6. Glad to see that many of the reforms concern the undemocratic caucus sysyem. N/T

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Baconator (Original post)

Sat Dec 9, 2017, 10:52 PM

11. this is going to be locked as it is duplicate content of the post linked below

Cannot reply in locked threads

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink