Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marble falls

(57,073 posts)
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 10:11 AM Dec 2017

Jeff Sessions Reportedly Revives Probe Of Uranium One Deal

Source: HuffPo


Jeff Sessions Reportedly Revives Probe Of Uranium One Deal
An FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s ties to the deal has found no wrongdoing.
By Alana Horowitz Satlin
Chip Somodevilla via Getty Images

The Justice Department is reviving an inquiry into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the government’s controversial approval of the Uranium One deal, NBC News reported on Thursday.

A now-dormant FBI investigation into whether Clinton had ties to the deal has not found evidence of wrongdoing. But NBC, citing “multiple law enforcement officials,” reported that Attorney General Jeff Sessions has in recent weeks directed Justice Department prosecutors to ask FBI agents to explain evidence uncovered in the probe.

<snip>

Following pressure from President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans, Sessions last month said he would consider appointing a new special counsel to look into Clinton and Uranium One, as well as other matters involving Democrats. Sessions pledged during his confirmation hearing last year that he would recuse himself from any possible investigations involving Clinton.

The Uranium One obsession among Trump and his allies has increased in recent months as Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe intensifies into the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia. Four people have been charged, including former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

Read more: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/jeff-sessions-uranium-one-hillary-clinton_us_5a3b9b52e4b025f99e14cd5e?ncid=inblnkushpmg00000009



Now the diversion effort begins in earnest.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jeff Sessions Reportedly Revives Probe Of Uranium One Deal (Original Post) marble falls Dec 2017 OP
And we are officially a banana republic... Moostache Dec 2017 #1
As Trump would ask, Wahdya got against bananas, these are yuge, bigly bananas, world class. marble falls Dec 2017 #2
It is small comfort that we have the best bananas that anyone has ever seen... Moostache Dec 2017 #3
Its not about bananas with the Orange Shitgibbon, its about misdirection and distraction. Bigly. marble falls Dec 2017 #13
Ya know what? Fine. Let them. Mueller wont be dissuaded! Roland99 Dec 2017 #4
Unfortunately... Wuddles440 Dec 2017 #11
Uranium One US production is one half of one percent of domestic Russian production Cicada Dec 2017 #5
Please Botany Dec 2017 #6
Trump can take Uranium One back with eminent domain. Why hasnt he? Cicada Dec 2017 #7
This is just so exhausting. Honeycombe8 Dec 2017 #8
Seems like blatant attempt to appease Trump to keep him from firing Sessions wishstar Dec 2017 #9
9/11 Bernardo de La Paz Dec 2017 #10
Sessions is desperate to stay on as Atty Genl DeminPennswoods Dec 2017 #12
Jeffy pledged to not get involved in Clinton obsessions bucolic_frolic Dec 2017 #14
What does Clinton have to do with Uranium One deal? Cold War Spook Dec 2017 #15
"She" didn't actually "vote in favor" as far as I've ever heard ... mr_lebowski Dec 2017 #16
Sessions knows they'll just look like idiots again. Ilsa Dec 2017 #17
Keebler Elf Loserman1962 Dec 2017 #18
Keebler Elf ... marble falls Dec 2017 #19
OFFS! sakabatou Dec 2017 #20
No political bias here, so move along! FreeStateDemocrat Dec 2017 #21
BENGHAZI!!!!!!1111 jpak Dec 2017 #22

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
1. And we are officially a banana republic...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 10:20 AM
Dec 2017

This 'administration' is an utter disaster for the republic, exactly as bad as I feared last November.

The "what-aboutism" is their calling card from Fox News playbook and to anyone NOT drunk on the Kool Aid or completely brain dead, it is obvious....unfortunately we have far more brain dead citizens than I feared...

Moostache

(9,895 posts)
3. It is small comfort that we have the best bananas that anyone has ever seen...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 10:26 AM
Dec 2017

Everyone (literally EVERYONE) is saying it....believe me.

Wuddles440

(1,121 posts)
11. Unfortunately...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:45 AM
Dec 2017

Mueller is toast. The Rethug cabal and their enablers in the media will not let him proceed much longer. Instead, they will embark on multiple "investigations" involving the Clintons, Democrats, and the "corrupt" FBI. I served 30 years in Federal law enforcement and the later is especially amusing considering that easily 95% of those in the FBI are staunch conservatives. In the future, I'm actually expecting them to demand an oath of fealty to Dotard and the RepubliCONS - they will rule with an iron fist and there will be no dissension.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
5. Uranium One US production is one half of one percent of domestic Russian production
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 10:31 AM
Dec 2017

Uranium One US production in 2016 was 23 tons. Russian domestic production in 2015 was 3055 tons. Russia’s weak neighbor Kazakhstan produces about as much, production Russia can muscle if they want to. The US production from Uranium One is vastly less important to our national security than our production of pumpkin spice. Literally.

Cicada

(4,533 posts)
7. Trump can take Uranium One back with eminent domain. Why hasnt he?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 10:44 AM
Dec 2017

Feds use eminent domain every day to get land needed for roads, military bases. If this uranium production is needed for our security Trump can grab it fast. Repubs say this thing is essential to protect us. Does Trump refuse to take it because he is a Russian Agent? Or because it’s trivial? It has to be one or the other.

DeminPennswoods

(15,278 posts)
12. Sessions is desperate to stay on as Atty Genl
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 11:58 AM
Dec 2017

so he can work his agenda to dismantle all the progress made in the last 65 years. I'm sure he could care less about "uranium one", but he knows Trump will be pleased with yet another investigation and that will allow him to stay on and continue his own dirty work.

bucolic_frolic

(43,123 posts)
14. Jeffy pledged to not get involved in Clinton obsessions
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 12:22 PM
Dec 2017

now here he is back again ... was it a pledged-only-implied recusal?

 

Cold War Spook

(1,279 posts)
15. What does Clinton have to do with Uranium One deal?
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 02:28 PM
Dec 2017

Yes, she voted in favor of the deal, but it was not up to the committee to make a binding decision. Even if all members of the committee vote no to the sale, they could not stop the sale, only tell the President whether or not they were for the deal. Even then, the company would have to get approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission before they could export the uranium.

 

mr_lebowski

(33,643 posts)
16. "She" didn't actually "vote in favor" as far as I've ever heard ...
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 03:46 PM
Dec 2017

State department simply didn't dissent from allowing the deal to move forward. They were 1 of like 9 agencies/committees with some say, and no veto power.

THere's no evidence I've seen that she personally was part of that decision-making.

Ilsa

(61,694 posts)
17. Sessions knows they'll just look like idiots again.
Thu Dec 21, 2017, 04:23 PM
Dec 2017

Let them investigate. Keep them busy with this vs trying to tear Mueller apart.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Jeff Sessions Reportedly ...