Democratic Senator Heitkamp Says She Will Vote for Funding Bill
Source: The New York Times
By REUTERSJAN. 19, 2018, 6:39 P.M. E.S.T.
WASHINGTON Democratic U.S. Senator Heidi Heitkamp said on Friday she would vote for a stopgap government funding bill, joining two other senators who have bucked their party and said they would support a Republican-backed bill to keep the government open.
"My vote to keep the government open is not an endorsement for a bill that just kicks the can down the road another few weeks," said Heitkamp, a senator from North Dakota, in a statement. "I want to find a long term solution to keep the government operating."
(Reporting by Makini Brice; Editing by Eric Beech)
###
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2018/01/19/us/politics/19reuters-usa-congress-shutdown-heitkamp.html
C_U_L8R
(44,996 posts)Get a dictionary.
cstanleytech
(26,273 posts)By delaying a permanent spending bill a bit longer say another three to four months it gives the Democrats the chance to put the Republicans on the defensive because we have an election coming up and they do not want to shut down the government just before an election.
lamp_shade
(14,824 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,262 posts)She doesn't work for Chuck Schumer. She works for the people of her state.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,262 posts)I was referring to her being "released" by Schumer.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Release just means schumer told her it won't make a difference so vote in a way which will help win in the red state.
she is so stupid that she didn't already know that? The word "release" implies permission.
JI7
(89,244 posts)Which is schumers job to keep track of.
Mr.Bill
(24,262 posts)Hell, everyone knows the numbers on this one.
JI7
(89,244 posts)lamp_shade
(14,824 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)still_one
(92,110 posts)constituents, and though I would love it if the Democrats would stand together against the republican bullies and blackmailers, I also recognize the political realities
lamp_shade
(14,824 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)The Republicans have a strategy.
First they passed a tax bill that will not adequately fund the government.
When it is obvious that the money they gave to rich corporations and donors is desperately needed to fund the government, they are going to point to all the money that goes to Social Securiity, Medicare and Medicaid and the VA and other really good programs that the most vulnerable Americans rely on to survive and start cutting them.
That is the Republican way.
And until Ms. Heitkcamp figures that out and figures out a way to explain that to the people of her state, she needs to quit her job and let someone who has figured it out and who can explain it to voters in her state do her job.
This is sheer stupidity. Voting to help the Republicans reach their longterm goals of cutting Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (and that is what she is doing) is sheer stupidity.
Lack of vision. Lack of comprehension. Lack of understanding about just how low and mean Republicans really are.
still_one
(92,110 posts)Sophia4
(3,515 posts)nation.
I'm from California and my income is Social Security.
My healthcare is Medicare.
I'm just like all the other old people in the country. Goes beyond state lines. I seriously doubt that she is able to see beyond this vote and figure out the Republican strategy although it is very obvious.
still_one
(92,110 posts)I doubt ND cares very much ch about DACA
kimbutgar
(21,103 posts)Will be used against her.
bluestarone
(16,894 posts)probably smart move on her part with the crazies in this RED state! I personally hope WE SHUT DOWN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
question everything
(47,460 posts)to run against her..
not fooled
(5,801 posts)She sounds like an astute strategist, even if not every Dem is on board.
In these times, we have to deal with the hand we are dealt.
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)Manchen(WV) is another one. I called his office this AM. There is a third Dem now but I can't find out who it is.
GulfCoast66
(11,949 posts)Have you even been to their states? I have.
Sounds to me like our leaders are doings a great job of supporting out candidates.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Whatever else she's doing, she is triangulating on a throwaway vote to broaden her support at home before the GOP can find a candidate to run against her.
But there are other explanations, too. It could be that a high-dollar donor called in a favor, which she happily burned on a throwaway vote. It could be that she's voting in solidarity with a caucus of states or another caucus, either formal or informal. It could be that she is trying to build the outlines of a coalition; if there were ten moderates in the Senate who agreed to stick together they could in theory wrest control of the appropriations process from the GOP and put it back into bipartisan hands. (Sorry, I don't remember how that's supposed to work in detail, but the coalition acts like a filibuster cork. If they're all for something, debate can be closed. If not, nobody can close the debate. Want to get something done, you've got to talk to them.)
But you are still correct. Those are explanations, not excuses.
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)A you a poli sci professor?
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Now an artist lost in a jungle far, far away from Donald Trump. I run into others like me in the forest, too, but we just run our separate ways.
If you want my professional opinion, we're fucked.
BigmanPigman
(51,582 posts)We are royally fucked.
Sophia4
(3,515 posts)Ccarmona
(1,180 posts)If one is not a political junkie, youd have no idea why these politicians are doing some Much postering. It leads to confusion and then indifference. Is that what we want out of DC?
truthisfreedom
(23,141 posts)shanny
(6,709 posts)Means fuck all without 8 other Democrats and all the Republicans.