Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,489 posts)
Wed Jan 24, 2018, 09:34 AM Jan 2018

Woman says Missouris strict abortion regulations violate her religion: the Satanic Temple

Source: Washington Post

A member of the Satanic Temple in Missouri has filed a lawsuit against the state that alleges that her religious rights are violated by the state’s abortion restrictions.

The anonymous plaintiff, who goes by the name Mary Doe in the lawsuit because she fears she would be subject to “personal attack,” brought her case before the state Supreme Court on Tuesday.

The woman, who has had an abortion, according to local news reports, alleges that the state’s requirement that Planned Parenthood — the only abortion provider in the state — distribute a booklet from the state’s Department of Health and Senior Services that stipulates that life begins at conception violates her beliefs as a member of the Satantic Temple.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2018/01/23/woman-says-that-missouris-strict-abortion-regulations-violate-her-religion-the-satanic-temple/



Hail Satan!
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Woman says Missouris strict abortion regulations violate her religion: the Satanic Temple (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2018 OP
+++++++++++ HAB911 Jan 2018 #1
Reminds me of Judge Reeves a couple of years back. Tactical Peek Jan 2018 #2
When someone tells you, you are in a fight and hands you a weapon, I guess use it? AtheistCrusader Jan 2018 #4
YES!!! Wordilocks Jan 2018 #3
Since it is a morality-based opinion rather than an evidence-based medical/scientific fact rocktivity Jan 2018 #5

Tactical Peek

(1,208 posts)
2. Reminds me of Judge Reeves a couple of years back.
Wed Jan 24, 2018, 11:54 AM
Jan 2018

U.S. District Judge Carlton Reeves asked lawyers for the state in court Friday if its controversial “religious freedom law” would protect Mississippians with sincerely held religious beliefs against straight marriage, just as it protects those with sincerely held religious beliefs against gay marriage.

A beat of silence followed.

Paul Barnes, who is defending the attorney general and the registrar of vital records in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of House Bill 1523, cleared his throat. Judge Reeves looked at him.

“I’m trying to parse it out,” Barnes said.

Almost a minute of silence followed. The other attorneys for the defense, Douglas Miracle and Tommy Goodwin, checked their notes. Someone coughed. Finally, Barnes leaned into his microphone.

“No, your honor. Based on the text it does not,” he said. “But I have not fully analyzed that question.”

https://mississippitoday.org/2016/06/24/state-admits-hb-1523-doesnt-go-both-ways/

rocktivity

(44,573 posts)
5. Since it is a morality-based opinion rather than an evidence-based medical/scientific fact
Wed Jan 24, 2018, 03:10 PM
Jan 2018

Last edited Fri Jan 26, 2018, 11:38 AM - Edit history (2)

Stipulating that life begins at conception violates EVERYONE'S beliefs.


rockivity

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Woman says Missouris stri...