Appeals court rules consumer bureau's structure is constitutional
Source: The Hill
Language in the Dodd-Frank Act that establishes the Consumer Financial Protection Bureaus independence from Congress is constitutional, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Colombia Circuit ruled Wednesday, overturning a 2016 ruling by three of the court's judges.
In a review of the courts previous decision in PHH vs. CFPB, the full panel held that the CFPB can exist as an independent agency with a sole director only fireable by the president for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance without violating the Constitution's limits on executive power.
Judge Nina Pillard, who wrote the courts opinion, cited the precedent set by Humphreys Executor v. United States, a 1935 case reaffirming the legality of the Federal Trade Commissions independent, sole-director structure.
We follow that precedent here to hold that the parallel provision of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act shielding the Director of the CFPB from removal without cause is consistent with Article II.
Read more: http://thehill.com/policy/finance/371603-dc-circuit-consumer-bureaus-structure-is-constiutional?rnd=1517414045/?userid=216387
Link to tweet
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)"Wednesday's ruling gives Mulvaney a clear path to continue reshaping the CFPB."
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)But the Ruling is contrary to that
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)The ruling upholds that Mulvaney can only be removed for cause.
The piece ends with the line I pasted above, that Mulvaney is free to keep being a major POS.
How does anything other than your post imply 'bye-bye Mulvaney'?
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)The ruling - in essence - overturns trump removing to "plant" Mulvaney
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)From YOUR OP's link:
Wednesday's ruling gives Mulvaney a clear path to continue reshaping the CFPB, as he will retain his power as acting director. Cordray said the ruling is important to the future of the bureau, even if it gives Mulvaney cover to unwind his legacy.
bucolic_frolic
(43,128 posts)Sure sounds similar.
yallerdawg
(16,104 posts)is a 'whimsical prerogative' of the elected representatives of the Democratic Party.
We know the R's function this way to advance their hateful, nasty, deplorable agendas, but that "Arc Keeps Bending" regardless!
elleng
(130,865 posts)laserhaas
(7,805 posts)ehrnst
(32,640 posts)elleng
(130,865 posts)tho doesn't strike me as one who pats herself on the back.
Faux pas
(14,667 posts)Weed Man
(304 posts)and fully fund the CPRB.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,920 posts)So much winning!!!!!
ehrnst
(32,640 posts)Amazing what a competent, knowledgeable, and collaborative Senator can accomplish in a few short years in public service!