Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:00 AM Mar 2018

Scott Pruitt's $25,000 soundproof phone booth? It actually cost more like $43,000.

Source: The Washington Post




By Brady Dennis and Juliet Eilperin March 14 at 8:00 AM

Before Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt could install a secure, soundproof phone booth in his office last fall, officials had to create space for the addition in a nearby closet area.

Those preparations didn’t come cheap.

The agency paid a Virginia firm $7,978 to remove closed-circuit television equipment to make room for the booth, according to a federal database. Officials hired another contractor to pour 55 square feet of concrete more than two feet thick, at a cost of $3,470, according to invoices released under a public records request by the watchdog group American Oversight. Other workers installed a drop ceiling for $3,361, while still others patched and painted the small area for $3,350, records show.

In total, the EPA appears to have spent more than $18,000 on the prep work, readying the space for a $25,000 soundproof booth that has brought Pruitt a wave of criticism and official scrutiny. The total cost for the project now appears to be closer to $43,000.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2018/03/14/scott-pruitts-25000-soundproof-phone-booth-it-actually-cost-more-like-43000

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Zoonart

(11,849 posts)
1. Can anyone explain why this elfin' guy
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:10 AM
Mar 2018

NEEDS a sound proof booth? He. is a public servant in the EPA...he. is not a super spy... oh wait......


MBS

(9,688 posts)
15. That is indeed the main question.
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 01:42 PM
Mar 2018

The fact that he even feels that he NEEDS something like this is the biggest obscenity of all.

Docreed2003

(16,858 posts)
2. This guy is the most paranoid dude Ive ever seen in public office
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:23 AM
Mar 2018

What is he doing that he needs all of these expensive security measures?

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
4. He's shaking down lobbyists for kickbacks
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:25 AM
Mar 2018

in exchange for favorable legislation and/or rolling back regulations. Can't have people listening in to that.

Flaleftist

(3,473 posts)
7. Okay. Im not in construction, but isnt there a better way to soundproof
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:53 AM
Mar 2018

a room than using 2 feet of concrete?

 

SCVDem

(5,103 posts)
14. Start with a Faraday cage for EM suppression
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 01:31 PM
Mar 2018

Then line the insides with anechoic foam.

Effective and cost efficient.

magicarpet

(14,144 posts)
8. He is getting his marching orders...
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 10:59 AM
Mar 2018

.... From the Kochs, the Mercers, and the CEOs of chemical companies and big industry but he does not what these insider deals to become public. The EPA will be decimated and gutted so the Fascist capitalists can dump toxic chemicals near and far while exploding their profits. Privatize the profits - socialize the costs of doing business. Spill as many of your business operational costs into someone else's lap - this is how toxic Super Fund Sites are made - then the US taxpayer gets stuck with the toxic chemicals clean up costs.

magicarpet

(14,144 posts)
10. Trump has his own toxic mess he refuses to pay...
Wed Mar 14, 2018, 11:12 AM
Mar 2018

..... to clean up. Playing a shell game of who is the responsible owner so he and his son can avoid responsibility to clean up a toxic mess created by them.

--------------------------------------------------

(NYT - snip)

Chemical containers at the Titan Atlas Manufacturing site in North Charleston, S.C. President Trump’s eldest son helped start the company in 2010. It failed two years later.CreditKate Thornton for The New York Times
By Barry Meier

Feb. 7, 2017
South Carolina regulators on Tuesday rejected an effort by the Trump Organization to limit its environmental cleanup liabilities at an industrial site once owned by President Trump’s eldest son.

The decision is a rebuke of the Trump Organization and could result in millions of dollars in added costs for the company. It followed a refusal by the organization to provide regulators with required information about business ......

(end snip - much more at link)

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/02/07/business/energy-environment/trump-organization-titan-environmental-cleanup.html?referer=android-app://com.google.android.googlequicksearchbox

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Scott Pruitt's $25,000 so...