Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Fed Ct tosses Obama-era rule requiring financial advisers to act in customers' best interests
Source: The HILL
Link to tweet
.
A divided federal appeals court on Thursday tossed out an Obama-era Department of Labor (DOL) rule that required financial investment advisers to act in the best interest of their clients.
In a 2-1 ruling, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals said the fiduciary rule bears the hallmarks of "unreasonableness" and constitutes an arbitrary and capricious exercise of administrative power.
The lawsuit stems from a challenge the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and eight other business and financial groups brought against the rule.
The groups argued the DOL erased universally recognized distinctions between salespeople and fiduciary advisers and reconfigured relationships among financial and insurance representatives and their customers in setting the new standards of conduct.
Read more: http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/378722-federal-appeals-court-tosses-out-obama-era-labor-dept-fiduciary-rule?amp&__twitter_impression=true
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 2308 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (16)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fed Ct tosses Obama-era rule requiring financial advisers to act in customers' best interests (Original Post)
laserhaas
Mar 2018
OP
blue-wave
(4,351 posts)1. Why do I get the feeling
that we are barreling toward another national/world financial disaster? The republicons never ever learn from their mistakes. Throughout history to the present they have been/are dysfunctional idiots, working as hard as they can to create a world of pain and suffering.
laserhaas
(7,805 posts)4. Goldman Sachs & Rothschilds make big money
Out of chaos
volstork
(5,399 posts)8. "The republicons never ever learn from their mistakes."
It's not a mistake for them. They make out like bandits; it's the rest of us who suffer.
TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)2. Legalizing theft. Pure "capitalism" at its worst. nt
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)3. just another FUCK THE PEOPLE
Vinca
(50,261 posts)5. Well that really makes you want to put your life savings in the hands of a stranger.
ananda
(28,858 posts)6. 5th Circuit -- WORST COURT IN THE NATION !!!
ugghhh
groundloop
(11,518 posts)7. Don't right wingers go out of their way to file cases in the 5th Circuit?
Seeing how they ruled on this case I'd have to imagine this group of judges is extremely business friendly and anti-consumer.
This ruling is absolute bullshit - someone claiming to be a financial adviser should most definitely be expected to act in the best interest of their customer.
alarimer
(16,245 posts)9. How the FUCK is that unreasonable?
I am speechless.
Nitram
(22,791 posts)10. I just can't believe the greed and disregard for the American people.
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)11. "the fiduciary rule bears the hallmarks of unreasonableness" ?!?
In other news, court rules that patients undergoing surgery cannot reasonably expect the doctor to attempt keeping them alive and healthy.
sakabatou
(42,146 posts)12. UGH!