A Judge Just Denied Paul Manafort's Motion To Dismiss The Indictment Against Him In DC
Source: Buzzfeed
A federal judge on Tuesday denied former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's motion to dismiss the indictment returned against him by a grand jury in Washington, DC -- rejecting Manafort's challenge to special counsel Robert Mueller's appointment.
Read more: https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/a-judge-just-denied-paul-manaforts-motion-to-dismiss-the?utm_term=.ei2OxRJJna#.ee3pzvVVQq
Gothmog
(145,079 posts)riversedge
(70,182 posts)YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Then on appeal that is one of the things it will ask to overturn.
YessirAtsaFact
(2,064 posts)To show he isnt biased.
He also knew full well that the motion was BS.
Let the screws slowly turn on him.
Stallion
(6,474 posts)the ReTrumplicans were so EXCITED about this "genius" judge-Trump even reported his hearing statements at a rally. Judges often ask tough question to test the side they eventually rule in favor of-makes it easier to write their opinion
blugbox
(951 posts)The judge asked very harsh, pointed questions, because he wants a direct and succinct answer. Like people have said, this is done because now Manafort can't argue any vagueness in Mueller's appointment or power.
This is very exciting news, even if not the most surprising! Made my day better!!
Gothmog
(145,079 posts)Manafort made the same argument in both cases. This is the ruling for the case in DC which was argued a week before the argument in the Virginia case. Manafort is going to trial in both DC on reporting issues and money laundering in DC and in Virginia for tax evasion and bank fraud. This ruling should have an impact on the Virginia court's ruling
johnnyknj
(37 posts)Gothmog
(145,079 posts)Last week a judge asked questions about Mueller's authority to bring these charges. That was the second time that Manafort had made this weak arguments. This ruling is strong evidence that Mueller clearly has authority to bring these charges
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
RandySF
(58,723 posts)Izzy Blue
(282 posts)Waiting on Judge Ellis to rule on that.
Good though that the DC ruling came out in time for Ellis to ponder if he had any doubts.
This is a different judge. This is from the judge in DC. Manafort made this argument two weeks ago. The other case is in Virginia and that judge has not ruled.
The judge in DC wrote a strong opinion and that should have some impact on the ruling in the Virginia case.
Here is a link to the opinion https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4463449/ABJManafort.pdf
From the opinion
pnwmom
(108,973 posts)to see how the judge in the other trial will rule, but I'm hopeful.
.99center
(1,237 posts)"Who had connections to the Russian government? Who attended meetings on behalf of the campaign?" Berman Jackson wrote. "Given the combination of his prominence within the campaign and his ties to Ukrainian officials supported by and operating out of Russia, as well as to Russian oligarchs, Manafort was an obvious person of interest."
"The Special Counsel would have been remiss to ignore such an obvious potential link between the Trump campaign and the Russian government," she wrote later in the opinion.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/05/15/politics/manafort-special-counsel/index.html
SkatmanRoth
(843 posts)The deal will include testimony against President Trump.
Trump is going down!
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,988 posts)Mueller may not need Manafort caving.
It would be a mistake to limit jail time to tRump's inner circle. The conspiracy is wider than that. People like Manafort need to go to prison even if they do cooperate. Give him one year if he cooperates instead of 45 years if he doesn't.
I would not be surprised if there is a sealed indictment or two against Manafort that are even more serious than "Conspiracy against the USA", though that is serious enough to receive serious jail time.
Gothmog
(145,079 posts)aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)#MAGA (the Mueller one)
BobTheSubgenius
(11,562 posts)If nothing else, it gives him some more shit to whine about. He and his gruesome cadre of "associates" find that valuable.