Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gothmog

(145,079 posts)
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:05 PM May 2018

A Judge Just Denied Paul Manafort's Motion To Dismiss The Indictment Against Him In DC

Source: Buzzfeed

A federal judge on Tuesday denied former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort's motion to dismiss the indictment returned against him by a grand jury in Washington, DC -- rejecting Manafort's challenge to special counsel Robert Mueller's appointment.

Read more: https://www.buzzfeed.com/zoetillman/a-judge-just-denied-paul-manaforts-motion-to-dismiss-the?utm_term=.ei2OxRJJna#.ee3pzvVVQq

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Judge Just Denied Paul Manafort's Motion To Dismiss The Indictment Against Him In DC (Original Post) Gothmog May 2018 OP
From my twitter feed Gothmog May 2018 #1
great to see the Judge note that the charge falls with Muellers authority. riversedge May 2018 #22
Not a surprise YessirAtsaFact May 2018 #2
Yes. It's probably standard to move to dismiss. Always denied. Honeycombe8 May 2018 #20
That's probably why the judge was hard on the prosecution YessirAtsaFact May 2018 #21
K&R sheshe2 May 2018 #3
Yay! jpak May 2018 #4
The Great "Right Hope" Goes down in Flames Stallion May 2018 #5
This is what people need to take away from this... blugbox May 2018 #8
That was the second of the motions brought by Manafort Gothmog May 2018 #9
Different judge johnnyknj May 2018 #11
This was the first of the two motions made by Manafort Gothmog May 2018 #6
Is this the judge we worried about last week? RandySF May 2018 #7
No, that was Manafort's Virginia indictments Izzy Blue May 2018 #10
No Gothmog May 2018 #13
This opinion was written by Judge Amy Jackson. Still waiting pnwmom May 2018 #12
The Special Counsel would have been remiss to ignore such an obvious potential link .99center May 2018 #14
Manafort will plead to a lesser charge to stay out of jail SkatmanRoth May 2018 #15
Dunno. Manafort pretty high up. It would be a mistake to limit jail time to tRump's inner circle. Bernardo de La Paz May 2018 #18
I fully expect the "mean" federal judge who got a lot of press in a separate Paul Manafort case out Gothmog May 2018 #16
Oh, that's gonna leave a mark. aeromanKC May 2018 #17
I'm sure it was recognized by all as being a Hail Mary. BobTheSubgenius May 2018 #19

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
20. Yes. It's probably standard to move to dismiss. Always denied.
Tue May 15, 2018, 06:53 PM
May 2018

Then on appeal that is one of the things it will ask to overturn.

YessirAtsaFact

(2,064 posts)
21. That's probably why the judge was hard on the prosecution
Tue May 15, 2018, 07:07 PM
May 2018

To show he isn’t biased.

He also knew full well that the motion was BS.

Stallion

(6,474 posts)
5. The Great "Right Hope" Goes down in Flames
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:18 PM
May 2018

the ReTrumplicans were so EXCITED about this "genius" judge-Trump even reported his hearing statements at a rally. Judges often ask tough question to test the side they eventually rule in favor of-makes it easier to write their opinion

blugbox

(951 posts)
8. This is what people need to take away from this...
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:24 PM
May 2018

The judge asked very harsh, pointed questions, because he wants a direct and succinct answer. Like people have said, this is done because now Manafort can't argue any vagueness in Mueller's appointment or power.

This is very exciting news, even if not the most surprising! Made my day better!!

Gothmog

(145,079 posts)
9. That was the second of the motions brought by Manafort
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:24 PM
May 2018

Manafort made the same argument in both cases. This is the ruling for the case in DC which was argued a week before the argument in the Virginia case. Manafort is going to trial in both DC on reporting issues and money laundering in DC and in Virginia for tax evasion and bank fraud. This ruling should have an impact on the Virginia court's ruling

Gothmog

(145,079 posts)
6. This was the first of the two motions made by Manafort
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:20 PM
May 2018

Last week a judge asked questions about Mueller's authority to bring these charges. That was the second time that Manafort had made this weak arguments. This ruling is strong evidence that Mueller clearly has authority to bring these charges




 

Izzy Blue

(282 posts)
10. No, that was Manafort's Virginia indictments
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:27 PM
May 2018

Waiting on Judge Ellis to rule on that.
Good though that the DC ruling came out in time for Ellis to ponder if he had any doubts.

Gothmog

(145,079 posts)
13. No
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:39 PM
May 2018

This is a different judge. This is from the judge in DC. Manafort made this argument two weeks ago. The other case is in Virginia and that judge has not ruled.

The judge in DC wrote a strong opinion and that should have some impact on the ruling in the Virginia case.

Here is a link to the opinion https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4463449/ABJManafort.pdf

From the opinion

Manafort points to no legal requirement or Departmental policy, and there is nothing in any statute or the Special Counsel Regulations, that would require the prosecutor to look away if the duly authorized investigation into those links revealed evidence of a crime other than “coordination.” The Appointment Order specifically provided: “if the Special Counsel believes it is necessary and appropriate, the Special Counsel is authorized to prosecute federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters.” Appt. Order ¶ (c); see also 28 U.S.C. § 515 (“[A]ny attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may . . . conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings . . . , which United States attorneys are authorized by law to conduct.”); 28 C.F.R. § 600.6 (“[T]he Special Counsel shall exercise, within the scope of his or her jurisdiction, the full power and independent authority to exercise all investigative and prosecutorial functions of any United States Attorney.”). 10 Thus, the indictment was authorized by the portion of the Appointment Order that Manafort does not challenge. Since the investigation into and the indictment for the pending charges fell within the unchallenged first paragraph of the Appointment Order, Manafort’s motion to dismiss can be denied for that reason alone

pnwmom

(108,973 posts)
12. This opinion was written by Judge Amy Jackson. Still waiting
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:31 PM
May 2018

to see how the judge in the other trial will rule, but I'm hopeful.

.99center

(1,237 posts)
14. The Special Counsel would have been remiss to ignore such an obvious potential link
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:54 PM
May 2018

"Who had connections to the Russian government? Who attended meetings on behalf of the campaign?" Berman Jackson wrote. "Given the combination of his prominence within the campaign and his ties to Ukrainian officials supported by and operating out of Russia, as well as to Russian oligarchs, Manafort was an obvious person of interest."

"The Special Counsel would have been remiss to ignore such an obvious potential link between the Trump campaign and the Russian government," she wrote later in the opinion.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/05/15/politics/manafort-special-counsel/index.html


SkatmanRoth

(843 posts)
15. Manafort will plead to a lesser charge to stay out of jail
Tue May 15, 2018, 05:59 PM
May 2018

The deal will include testimony against President Trump.

Trump is going down!

Bernardo de La Paz

(48,988 posts)
18. Dunno. Manafort pretty high up. It would be a mistake to limit jail time to tRump's inner circle.
Tue May 15, 2018, 06:30 PM
May 2018

Mueller may not need Manafort caving.

It would be a mistake to limit jail time to tRump's inner circle. The conspiracy is wider than that. People like Manafort need to go to prison even if they do cooperate. Give him one year if he cooperates instead of 45 years if he doesn't.

I would not be surprised if there is a sealed indictment or two against Manafort that are even more serious than "Conspiracy against the USA", though that is serious enough to receive serious jail time.

BobTheSubgenius

(11,562 posts)
19. I'm sure it was recognized by all as being a Hail Mary.
Tue May 15, 2018, 06:45 PM
May 2018

If nothing else, it gives him some more shit to whine about. He and his gruesome cadre of "associates" find that valuable.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A Judge Just Denied Paul ...