Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cqo_000

(313 posts)
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:01 AM Sep 2012

No Syria safe zones without UN says Turkey

Source: AFP

DAMASCUS — Turkey said that UN agreement was necessary to set up safe havens in Syria to stem an exodus of refugees as fierce fighting raged in the north and protesters demanded the end of the regime.

As the fighting raged, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told Kanal Turk television that no steps could be taken to create safe zones to protect refugees inside Syria "without any resolution at the UN Security Council".

His comments came the day after his foreign minister Ahmet Davutoglu expressed frustration at the reluctance of Ankara's Western allies to heed its calls for protected camps inside Syria to cope with the rapidly swelling numbers of fleeing civilians.

A Turkish diplomat told AFP Ankara would maintain its campaign for a safe haven inside Syria for the tens of thousands of civilians fleeing the violence, despite the appeal to the UN Security Council falling on deaf ears.

Read more: http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5g57b5ZY5z1VyJch6u53oIn3VZI_w?docId=CNG.bb9c1ce5d6dfc97bdde7a1153bafa6b1.141

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Syria safe zones without UN says Turkey (Original Post) cqo_000 Sep 2012 OP
Wise. nt bemildred Sep 2012 #1
Indeed. Igel Sep 2012 #3
It is bad enough even with the pretense of legitimacy that the UN gives. bemildred Sep 2012 #4
Safe for terrorism. David__77 Sep 2012 #2

Igel

(35,293 posts)
3. Indeed.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 03:58 PM
Sep 2012

Best not to commit an act of war without first making sure the lexicographers have declared your act to be an act of peace.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
4. It is bad enough even with the pretense of legitimacy that the UN gives.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 06:26 PM
Sep 2012

Without it, it's just a private squabble among the self-interested.

But it's not like everybody is not meddling yet, or will stop.

David__77

(23,364 posts)
2. Safe for terrorism.
Sat Sep 1, 2012, 02:08 PM
Sep 2012

Finally though, Russia and China have taken a stand for sovereignty, realizing that they are on the list for dismemberment and destruction as well.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»No Syria safe zones witho...