'Treating protest as terrorism': US plans crackdown on Keystone XL activists
Source: Guardian
Documents suggest an aggressive response to possible protests against the oil pipeline amid fears of another Standing Rock.
The government has characterized pipeline opponents like her as extremists and violent criminals and warned of potential terrorism, according to recently released records.
Life on the Keystone XL route: where opponents fear the black snake
Read more
The documents suggested that police were organizing to launch an aggressive response to possible Keystone protests, echoing the actions against the Standing Rock movement in North Dakota. There, officers engaged in intense surveillance and faced widespread accusations of excessive force and brutality.
We have to stay one step ahead at all times, said Cheek, a Hunkpapa and Oglala Lakota activist and teacher. History is repeating itself.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/sep/20/keystone-pipeline-protest-activism-crackdown-standing-rock
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)Banishing Native Americans to settle white people like me in areas for farming food and cattle was not enough. Now, we wish to pollute those tribal lands claiming imminent domain for oil companies and mining interests.
I am ashamed to think that centuries later we are still committing genocide and financial rape of a native population. Is this who we always were? "For the times they are a changing".
Thekaspervote
(32,757 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,896 posts)Sorry but the First Amendment doesn't just apply to "corporation-people".
And they need to start looking at the REAL "domestic terrorists" who they courted to vote for the current administration.
Thekaspervote
(32,757 posts)Around the country!
The Liberal Lion
(1,414 posts)And if the current state of resistance is any indicator they will get away with this, and it will broaden to include all protest. We are in sick and dangerous times my friend.
jalan48
(13,860 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,310 posts)We were on land that the pipeline company doesnt even claim to have, she said, adding that she had permission in writing from the property owner to be there. I didnt think there was really any risk at all.
Savage, a freelance reporter who teaches at the City University of New Yorks graduate school of journalism, has previously covered the BP oil spill and environmental justice issues. Truthout describes her as embedded with Leau Est La Vie protest camp, which opposes the pipeline.
She now faces critical infrastructure trespass charges, as do over half a dozen others recently arrested near Bayou Bridge construction. These felony charges come under a newly minted Louisiana law modeled after critical infrastructure laws in other states, which have been criticized as efforts to criminalize oil and gas pipeline protests.
https://www.desmogblog.com/2018/08/22/louisiana-law-bayou-bridge-pipeline-trespass-energy-transfer-partners
Even having the landowner's permission won't help you. Oil trumps property rights, freedom of protest, and freedom of the press. They're using the constitution as a rag in a gas-filled Molotov cocktail.