Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,859 posts)
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 01:50 PM Nov 2018

Trump would not intervene if Whitaker moves to curtail Mueller probe

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump said in an interview aired on Sunday he would not intervene if Matthew Whitaker, his acting U.S. attorney general, moved to curtail Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

In an interview with the “Fox News Sunday” program taped on Friday, Trump also said he probably would not agree to a sit-down interview with Mueller, who also is investigating whether the Republican president’s campaign conspired with Moscow and whether Trump has unlawfully sought to obstruct the probe.

Whitaker took over supervision of Mueller’s investigation on Nov. 7 after Trump appointed him as the chief U.S. law enforcement official to replace Jeff Sessions, who the president ousted. Whitaker, who Democrats have called a Trump “political lackey,” in the past criticized the scope of the Mueller probe and brought up the possibility of undermining it by slashing Mueller’s funding.

Trump, in the interview, said he was unaware of Whitaker’s past statements about Mueller’s probe and that he would “not get involved” if Whitaker moved to curtail it.

-snip-

POLITICS NOVEMBER 18, 2018 / 10:57 AM / UPDATED AN HOUR AGO
Amanda Becker
5 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia/trump-would-not-intervene-if-whitaker-moves-to-curtail-mueller-probe-idUSKCN1NN0LN

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump would not intervene if Whitaker moves to curtail Mueller probe (Original Post) Eugene Nov 2018 OP
'Surprise!' empedocles Nov 2018 #1
"Trump, in the interview, said he was unaware of Whitaker's past statements about Mueller's probe.." Botany Nov 2018 #2
Right? Also what about blugbox Nov 2018 #11
The ghost of Nixon needs to visit him SCantiGOP Nov 2018 #18
That's obstruction too Turbineguy Nov 2018 #3
Didn't he intervene when he appointed Whitaker? jalan48 Nov 2018 #4
You mean when he unconstitutionally leapfrogged over others to appoint him cstanleytech Nov 2018 #12
Yes-he's accusing others of doing what he does. jalan48 Nov 2018 #19
If Whitaker confines or constrains or denies Mueller anything he wants, Congress is notified. RockRaven Nov 2018 #5
Of course not! That's what he hired him to do Maeve Nov 2018 #6
+1 sandensea Nov 2018 #7
Ya but McTurtle Said There's Nothing to Worry About Mueller's Future Ccarmona Nov 2018 #8
What McTurtle really meant was that there's nothing for TRUMP to worry about! red dog 1 Nov 2018 #13
Duh. (n/t) Iggo Nov 2018 #9
Imagine, people get paid to write stuff like this. n/t malthaussen Nov 2018 #10
Do the words "Constitutional Crisis" sound familiar? red dog 1 Nov 2018 #14
Whitaker: "Mueller, stop the Russia Probe"..... Mustellus Nov 2018 #15
Of course not Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2018 #16
Hell, there would be champagne corks flying all over the white house! PSPS Nov 2018 #17
duh Takket Nov 2018 #20
trump has intervened and obstructed justice from the very beginning... olddad56 Nov 2018 #21

Botany

(70,483 posts)
2. "Trump, in the interview, said he was unaware of Whitaker's past statements about Mueller's probe.."
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 01:55 PM
Nov 2018

So Trump doesn't watch Fox News?

Turbineguy

(37,313 posts)
3. That's obstruction too
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 01:56 PM
Nov 2018

Remember Donnie, "Act guilty!"

Maybe it's all part of the strategery. Donnie lies. Always. Therefore if he acts guilty, everyone will think, "He must be innocent!"

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
5. If Whitaker confines or constrains or denies Mueller anything he wants, Congress is notified.
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 02:02 PM
Nov 2018

That probably makes things worse for Trump (now that Dems will have the House) than just letting Mueller do his thing.

But Trump didn't get himself into this mess by knowing the rules and procedures and how best to avoid running afoul of them.

Maeve

(42,279 posts)
6. Of course not! That's what he hired him to do
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 02:04 PM
Nov 2018
he just can't stop digging that hole he's in, can he?
 

Ccarmona

(1,180 posts)
8. Ya but McTurtle Said There's Nothing to Worry About Mueller's Future
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 02:49 PM
Nov 2018

So everything’s cool 😎

It will be interesting to see if the Supreme Court weighs in since there is a case pending in which Whitaker’s legitimacy was attached to the proceedings.

red dog 1

(27,792 posts)
13. What McTurtle really meant was that there's nothing for TRUMP to worry about!
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 04:07 PM
Nov 2018

To quote Mike Malloy: "Have I told you how much I hate these people?"

Mustellus

(328 posts)
15. Whitaker: "Mueller, stop the Russia Probe".....
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 04:09 PM
Nov 2018

Mueller: "Mr Whitaker, you are under arrest for obstruction of justice. You have the right to remain......

Takket

(21,552 posts)
20. duh
Sun Nov 18, 2018, 09:29 PM
Nov 2018

if fox had any journalistic integrity (they don't) after he said that they would have run the clip of him saying he was willing and anxious to talk to mueller, then ask him why he lied about that.

olddad56

(5,732 posts)
21. trump has intervened and obstructed justice from the very beginning...
Mon Nov 19, 2018, 12:36 AM
Nov 2018

I'm sure that Chump is under a lot of pressure from his boss, Putin, to get this over before the truth can come out.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump would not intervene...