Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stuart G

(38,410 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 09:36 PM Nov 2018

Sheryl Sandberg Says She saw Materials from PR Firm

Last edited Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:59 PM - Edit history (6)

Source: NBC News..(Facebook)

Sandberg, who last week said she hadn't known about the work of "Definers Public Affairs", said that emails referencing the firm had crossed her desk. Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer, on Wednesday revised her account of her knowledge of the company's relationship with Definers Public Affairs, the Washington-based public relations firm that the company hired last year and fired this month after a firestorm over the firm's tactics.

Definers, a firm founded by Republican operatives, has drawn criticism since The New York Times reported last week that it pushed reporters to investigate ties between billionaire George Soros and anti-Facebook advocates -- a tactic that Soros' office called a smear campaign with echoes of anti-Semitism.

Sandberg, who is second in command at the company to CEO Mark Zuckerberg, said in a statement posted online on Wednesday that she had learned more about Definers in recent days after ordering her staff to check records.

"I asked our team to look into the work Definers did for us and to double-check whether anything had crossed my desk," she said.

What they found, Sandberg wrote, was: "Some of their work was incorporated into materials presented to me and I received a small number of emails where Definers was referenced."



Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-s-sheryl-sandberg-says-she-saw-materials-pr-firm-n939186



Previously, Sandberg, Facebook's COO said she knew nothing about ..Definers.

Evidently, Facebook was criticized by George Soros, so Facebook hired this firm, Definers to go after Soros. Going after Soros meant that Definers would try to blunt Soros's criticism of Facebook by reaching out to reporters and ridiculing Soros and his statements. (that is my opinion of what is meant here.) In order to get more info, you would have to read the NYT expose on Facebook. Further, Sandberg claimed she didn't know, but now she says basically she had some material "cross her desk" That is, Facebook indeed, did hire Definers, and Sandberg lied about that. (that is what the story seems to say)

Additional opinion....It is not, repeat not a good idea to revise a story, about whether or not one did indeed lie about something that you said, you didn't do (didn't know about this company) (Definers) and then say, Yes, "We did hire this company, that is..."some work was incorportated into materials presented to me.." A lot like telling one lie, after another..Is that correct?
So..The COO lied about something that involved digging up info on a critic of her company. In the process, that company "Definers" also lied about the critic of the company..Soros.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Me.

(35,454 posts)
1. Hey Maybe She'll Wave Her Arm/Hands In An Artful Manner
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:33 PM
Nov 2018

and we'll forget/be distracted from the subject again

Stuart G

(38,410 posts)
2. Like someone else."Wave Her Arm/Hands in an Artful Manner" and forget that she lied..NO..
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:38 PM
Nov 2018

I don't think so. What is much worse for her, is that Facebook is not totally necessary for one to live. Yes, a convenience, but if 50 percent of its subscribers left..those subscribers could find other ways of communicating...
....But if 50 percent left, what about the price of Facebook stock?..What about some advertising?..It isn't totally necessary, is it?

Stuart G

(38,410 posts)
4. It is just starting....a lot of people with Facebook Accounts need to notify everyone that they are
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:50 PM
Nov 2018

leaving and communication needs to be made in other ways. That part is difficult..but time consuming. I have a facebook account, and I might leave.. It really is not that important..Yes, some communications from some, but I know I can live without it.

SergeStorms

(19,148 posts)
6. Why anyone would remain on Facebook is a mystery to me.
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:57 PM
Nov 2018

For all the underhanded garbage they've been caught at it's a mystery why anyone would trust them with any personal information at all. I did sign up with Facebook about 4 years ago, and after one day I could see where this was heading. Over 50 people I didn't know wanted to be my "friend". Yes, I know you can set filters to reduce that, but it seemed like a gigantic pyramid scheme to me. I deleted my account the very next day. There's no privacy in this world anymore, but I'll be damned if I'm going to help the scammers do their work for them.

Ferrets are Cool

(21,102 posts)
12. As far as personal reasons to use Facebook, I do not know...
Thu Nov 22, 2018, 12:32 AM
Nov 2018

but for me, it is the MAIN resource for my clients and me to connect. I didn't choose this medium...they did...so in order for me to maintain their "business" I need to use FB. Before I needed this resource for business, I never used FB before I needed it for this purpose.

I have NO friends that I don't want as friends. It is very easy to say NO to anyone wanting to be your friend. Are there comments on FB that I disagree with? Yes. Is it easy for me to either block those comments or ignore them? Yes

There are millions who use FB for business. It has a purpose. Everything can be used for "evil or wrongdoing". I choose to use it wisely.

BigmanPigman

(51,564 posts)
7. Stocks are down, moral is really low,
Wed Nov 21, 2018, 10:58 PM
Nov 2018

employees are pissed off at the media for "over playing" their activities in a negative light, the top two are supposedly getting along "better" now, they have to do a ton to win back consumer support, and will have to spend a very, very large amount to repair the security of their product. Times are not looking good for Fuckbook but if they are willing to bite the bullet they will manage. The problem for them is their greed. Not the first time this has happened and won't be the last.

blaze

(6,341 posts)
15. I can't read "Definers" without thinking of "Dementors" from Harry Potter.
Thu Nov 22, 2018, 06:55 AM
Nov 2018

The name just... irks me.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sheryl Sandberg Says She ...