White House prevents Gina Haspel from briefing Senate on Khashoggi murder
Source: Guardian
The White House is preventing the CIA director, Gina Haspel, or any other intelligence official from briefing the Senate on the murder of Saudi dissident and Washington Post columnist, Jamal Khashoggi.
The secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, and the defence secretary, James Mattis, are due to give a briefing on US relations with Saudi Arabia to the entire Senate behind closed doors on Wednesday, ahead of a vote that could cut off US support for Riyadhs military campaign in Yemen.
On a national security issue of such importance, it would be customary for a senior intelligence official to take part. On this occasion, the absence of the intelligence community is all the more glaring, as Haspel travelled to Istanbul to hear audio tapes of Khashoggis murder provided by Turkish intelligence, and then briefed Donald Trump.
Officials made it clear that the decision for Haspel not to appear in front of the committee came from the White House.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/nov/27/jamal-khashoggi-murder-senate-briefing-saudi-arabia-gina-haspel-white-house
Constant coverups, misinformation, and lies.
I cannot wait until he is out of office.
Martin Eden
(12,863 posts)Please make it so.
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,889 posts)hlthe2b
(102,225 posts)dchill
(38,471 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)riversedge
(70,186 posts)He is buds with Trumpy.
zipplewrath
(16,646 posts)Nothing prevents the Senate from requesting a briefing from the Canadians. They might even say yes.
erronis
(15,237 posts)What rank amateurs are leading the government now. And I emphasize the word "rank".
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Equinox Moon
(6,344 posts)marble falls
(57,075 posts)onenote
(42,692 posts)Really?
marble falls
(57,075 posts)investigation? Do you think there are no Republicans who want to hear from her, none? Really?
Mueller's still here, and there are plenty of Republicans who would like to hear from CIA.
onenote
(42,692 posts)Pretty much every Democrat supported legislation to protect Mueller. All it would have taken is less than a handful of Republicans. But they couldn't get it to happen.
And they won't subpoena Haspel over the objections of the WH either.
Can you say lapdogs?
marble falls
(57,075 posts)New poll shows Republicans want Mueller to continue his probe but many fear what he might uncover
Mueller has the country's support.
By Cody Fenwick / AlterNet
November 27, 2018, 12:13 PM GMT
https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/new-poll-shows-republicans-want-mueller-continue-his-probe-many-fear-what-he-might
After a significant lull in Russia investigations news in the run-up to the 2016 midterm elections, Special Counsel Robert Mueller's probe is back in the headlines in a big way.
President Donald Trump clearly feels the pressure of the potential looming indictments hanging over him, and with the newest revelation that Mueller believes that former Trump Campaign Chair Paul Manafort lied and violated the terms of his plea agreement, speculation about potential backroom deals has ramped up.
But while Trump's main insurance policy against the investigation has been a campaign to sow doubt about Mueller's integrity, new polling from Hart Research Associates shows that this plan isn't having the hoped-for effect.
An overwhelming majority of Americans 76 percent supports letting Mueller complete the investigation.
"Majorities of Democrats (94%), independents (78%), and Republicans (55%) say that Mueller should be allowed to complete his investigation," the Geoff Garin president of Hart Research said in a press release. (Garin, it should be noted, worked on Hillary Clinton's 2008 campaign, though the poll contained a proportionate sample of Democratic and Republican voters.)
Despite majority support for the probe, 78 percent of Republicans nevertheless still said that they believed the probed is biased against Truno, a theme the president has pressed.
"Of special note in this regard is that 81% of all voters, including 62% of Republicans and 60% of those who say the Mueller investigation is biased, say that if the Mueller investigation results in additional criminal indictments of people who were part of the Trump campaign or personally close to President Trump, those indictments should be prosecuted in the courts and should not be dropped or dismissed," Garin writes.
This suggests that, while Trump has been successful to some extent in promoting his perspective on the probe, it's not clear he's actually built a strong base of support for undermining it or for ignoring its conclusions should they be harmful to him. The poll results also show that 82 percent of Republicans, and 90 percent of voters generally, hope that a report from the Mueller probe eventually becomes public and most don't think Trump should be allowed to block it.
Many Republicans are also concerned about what Mueller's probe might uncover about the president and his allies, suggesting that the pessimistic view that nothing could shake the party's support for Trump is wrong.
"The greatest causes for concern among Republican voters would be if members of the Trump family engaged in illegal activities with the Russians prior to the 2016 campaign (46%) and if Donald Trump tried to obstruct law enforcement officials from investigating Russian interference and potential collusion by the Trump campaign during the 2016 election (45%)," said Garin.
Reflecting on the polling, conservative commentator Jennifer Rubin remarked: "If bipartisan support for Mueller is high now, imagine what it will be if he reveals more compelling evidence of financial wrongdoing, obstruction of justice or coordination with Russia to intervene in the election on Trumps behalf. The presidents reliance on his Republican base to stick with him no matter what may, in the long run, prove foolish."
Can you say 'informed opinion'?
onenote
(42,692 posts)avebury
(10,952 posts)time as there is full disclosure of the incident. We all know that the refusal of the WH to allow the CIA Director to brief the Senate is, in fact, an admission that case against the Saudi Crown Prince has to be pretty damning.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Hard to watch.
Botany
(70,489 posts)... get their cover stories straight? And what was Kushner's role in Khashoggi's murder?
marble falls
(57,075 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)The take over of the House by the Democrats can not happen fast enough. These fascists must be stopped before the destroy the country.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)somewhere down the Line, Justice will prevail!
CrispyQ
(36,457 posts)Even as it's happening before our eyes. I have friends who are in denial that the US could ever go fascist.
atreides1
(16,072 posts)What amount of shit one doesn't lick up, the other will!!!
Mattis is in this up to his eyeballs...he has no honor, no integrity, and no loyalty to the United States!!! Like Kelly, Mattis is an ex-marine!!!!
SpankMe
(2,957 posts)There's nothing that the WH can do about that and would be a slap in the face to their so-called "leadership".
Achilleaze
(15,543 posts)Murder most foul.
Tiger58
(35 posts)Another closed door meeting..Really.!! And he claims his administration {Cult} believes in transparency..
Glimmer of Hope
(5,823 posts)Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)RockRaven
(14,958 posts)for Trump to prevent her complying with the subpoena? If she is subpoenaed and wants to comply (to avoid committing a crime herself by refusing), what can Trump do? If he fires her, that just ends his power over her as her supervisor/boss and ends his ability to claim executive privilege.
world wide wally
(21,740 posts)lark
(23,091 posts)traitor
grifter
rapist
assaulter
racist
misogynist
money launderer
disloyal
stupid
willfully ignorant
narcissistic
demented
would be dictator
BadgerMom
(2,770 posts)Two (?) of his casino execs died in a helicopter crash before Trump filed bankruptcy but after at least one of them had been called to testify.
There have been ugly rumors about the death of a young girl who had been trafficked.
I dont wish to engage in spreading conspiracy theories. I hope he is not guilty of anything. But his demonstrated character is such that murder wouldnt shock me.
Enoki33
(1,587 posts)Russian so conveniently killed before he was due to testify. Utterly amazing that we are considering the real possibility that the traitor who stole an election could also be a an accomplice to murder.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)In a couple of months...
L-
Honeycombe8
(37,648 posts)Since when does the W.H. dictate all the duties of the CIA? I know the President appoints the Director, but I've never heard that hte W.H. directs the CIA on how to do its business. In fact, in years past, the CIA has investigated or kept files on W.H. people, I believe?
riversedge
(70,186 posts)whow--#trumpCorruption for all to see.
..Officials made it clear that the decision for Haspel not to appear in front of the committee came from the White House.
Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)I believe William Cullen Bryant is right :: "Truth crushed to earth will rise again."