Trump: I'm nearing decision on emergency declaration to build wall
Source: Politico
President Donald Trump again threatened Sunday to declare a national emergency as a means to construct his proposed wall along the U.S.-Mexico border, saying he would first gauge the results of upcoming negotiations to end a partial government shutdown triggered by partisan debate over his campaign trail promise.
I may decide a national emergency depending on what happens over the next few days, Trump told reporters as he exited the White House en route to Camp David, according to a pool report.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/story/2019/01/06/trump-emergency-border-wall-government-shutdown-1082712
Since when our country became dictatorship? Who does Drumpf think he is?
But he is crazy and could very well try to declare national emergency.
If that does happen I hope SCOTUS will rule against him.
How does the military fit into this picture? Will military remove him from office?
Firestorm49
(4,030 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)watoos
(7,142 posts)I mean the provision is for a real national emergency and not for a made up one. Yeah he can be challenged in the courts but that will take time.
Brings back memories of my uncle who was in the SeaBees.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)What is reminiscent of your uncle in the SeaBees? Did I miss something? Also, I've wondered if you are from Pittsburgh, or just a Steelers fan.
Kali
(55,006 posts)what did I miss?
orangecrush
(19,499 posts)Could be used for the purpose of constructing?
cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)Why? Because the Constitution does not give the President the right to bypass Congress whom is entrusted the power of the purse.
Not to mention it would be allowing the President to seize American citizens land without even a hearing to build the wall.
In fact it might actually give our people the ability to both impeach him and win a conviction in the Senate to remove him because the Repugnants in the Senate do not want to be the ones to own taking private citizens land like he is proposing.
ripcord
(5,318 posts)Remember the wall was approved in 2006 but it has never been funded, if he finds the funds the courts may let him proceed.
TomCADem
(17,387 posts)The fact that Trump is threatening to "close the border" or declare an emergency simply because he can't force Congress to support the construction of an expensive, ineffective wall makes you wonder what he will do when his own election is at stake or if he is at risk of impeachment.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2019/01/presidential-emergency-powers/576418/
In the weeks leading up to the 2018 midterm elections, President Donald Trump reached deep into his arsenal to try to deliver votes to Republicans.
Most of his weapons were rhetorical, featuring a mix of lies and false inducementsclaims that every congressional Democrat had signed on to an open borders bill (none had), that liberals were fomenting violent mobs (they werent), that a 10 percent tax cut for the middle class would somehow pass while Congress was out of session (it didnt). But a few involved the aggressive useand threatened misuseof presidential authority: He sent thousands of active-duty soldiers to the southern border to terrorize a distant caravan of desperate Central American migrants, announced plans to end the constitutional guarantee of birthright citizenship by executive order, and tweeted that law enforcement had been strongly notified to be on the lookout for ILLEGAL VOTING.
These measures failed to carry the day, and Trump will likely conclude that they were too timid. How much further might he go in 2020, when his own name is on the ballotor sooner than that, if hes facing impeachment by a House under Democratic control?
More is at stake here than the outcome of one or even two elections. Trump has long signaled his disdain for the concepts of limited presidential power and democratic rule. During his 2016 campaign, he praised murderous dictators. He declared that his opponent, Hillary Clinton, would be in jail if he were president, goading crowds into frenzied chants of Lock her up. He hinted that he might not accept an electoral loss. As democracies around the world slide into autocracy, and nationalism and antidemocratic sentiment are on vivid display among segments of the American populace, Trumps evident hostility to key elements of liberal democracy cannot be dismissed as mere bluster.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,782 posts)Call your Washington Reps and demand they stop this no matter what Party they are. Tell them you will not vote for them if they approve Trump taking matters into his own hands when there is no PHYSICAL threat from those seeking asylum.
maddiemom
(5,106 posts)Why do they keep reporting the declarations and obsessions of the Mad Man in the White House as if this behavior has been anything near to normal for any other POTUS? We've had a few previous doozies in that office, but NONE of them has been as delusional as Trump. Just in the past few days he's declared himself as "winning perhaps the greatest election victory of all time;" "having the most successful first two years of any president in the history of our country (FDR, get behind him where you belong)" "most popular president of any other in his party (Ike, eat your heart out. Reagan: preposterous, but long the Repug idol)" Does he think any SANE person of any party swallows this typical lie? If so, he's delusional. Does HE really believe it? If so, his delusions know no bounds. Either way Trump is obviously in his own fictional world. Don't the PTB, even of his own party, realize how dangerous he is to us, the world over?
theaocp
(4,235 posts)BRING IT!
Phoenix61
(16,999 posts)Grab on to a really, really bad idea then go all in. He doesn't understand the US isn't a business he can break then walk away from.
Response to at140 (Original post)
turbinetree This message was self-deleted by its author.
jalan48
(13,853 posts)dalton99a
(81,426 posts)onetexan
(13,033 posts)this would be time to panic and get the impeachment moving
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Taking generations of property from USA's citizens should go very well for his die hard supporters, ummmmmmm, maybe.
Diverting military monies to such a wall, should go very well for the military, ummmmmmm, maybe.
Bad move. Let's see what his Republican do nothing party do? Of course, blame the Democrats.
C_U_L8R
(44,996 posts)and we're not playing along.
Take your dumb wall and shove it.
elmac
(4,642 posts)Is making millions of Americans revisit political science & civics class.
lark
(23,083 posts)They won't risk their careers and family by going against the traitor, just like in Germany in the 40's, they will hate him all the while they are following his orders.
EarlG
(21,941 posts)Trump says hes going to declare a national emergency to build the wall and therefore doesnt need Congresss money any more, so the shutdown can end. He gives McConnell permission to vote on the House bill in the Senate, it passes with massive bipartisan support, and he signs it.
Then he makes some bullshit toothless presidential proclamation that says the wall is going to be built, tells his base that hes declared an emergency and that the military will begin building he wall any day now, and tries to take credit for ending the shutdown.
Plausible?
I can also imagine Border Patrol / Homeland Security undertake routine or needed maintenance of border facilities and watch the White House spin this as "construction."
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... he coukd keep the drama going without the hard negative consequences of a long term shutdown.
guruoo
(5,092 posts)so as to save face for Trump. Trump then tidies up by playing (tweeting) the
"obstruction" card on that mean ol' "Congress".
Using emergency powers to get the wall would be total political suicide, IMO.
He needs a way to proclaim victory or he will never ever end this thing. Once he can say he won, no wall will ever have to be built because his attention will go elsewhere and by 2020 if he's still around he will have forgotten about it.
highplainsdem
(48,957 posts)big a step without his puppet-master's approval.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)I say go ahead...
christx30
(6,241 posts)declared a national healthcare emergency, since more people are killed by inadequate healthcare than criminals.
Id had loved to see how that one would have gone.
Declare the emergency, put Medicare for all in place. Guess its cool to spend $5 billion for a stupid bit of concrete if one guy wants it.
at140
(6,110 posts)Followed by serious bills. 6 months of cancer treatment can cost $400k.
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)I had lung cancer in 2002 when I turned 50 and 2 months after my 26 year marriage ended in divorce. Plus, I was fired from my job within 2 months after returning from surgery. I couldn't find a job for 9 months and the cost of COBRA to maintain continuous insurance, paying alimony, and paying my bills on unemployment at $1050 a month, soon wiped me out. The stress liked to killed me, knowing if I lapsed having health insurance I would never be able to be insured again because of a pre-existing condition. My bill for my treatment alone was over $350,000. I was quickly wiped out in only 9 months, of course I didn't have much to start from after just getting divorced.
at140
(6,110 posts)After cancer was discovered. Great job!!
PeeJ52
(1,588 posts)elmac
(4,642 posts)EarthFirst
(2,899 posts)...and recall how often we were told how close we were to suspending The Constitution and having a period of martial law implemented.
I would have never guessed that wed be further along towards a similar situation as we are now.
Its terrifying to believe that we are one Twitter update away from such a reality...
I promise you one thing: I will not be silenced under a declaration of national emergency!
FFS!
gibraltar72
(7,500 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)Wherefore art thou mutherfuckah?
Will you vote to convict?
Texin
(2,594 posts)One member of the JCoS (I believe he is) was criticizing this recent gambit either Friday or yesterday. And it is a frightening thing to contemplate, especially if the rethugs sit on their hands as usual. Everyone was asking Friday where McConnell was when he missed that Rose Garden press* conference. He was sitting in his office with the Rose Garden in plain sight. He was aware that this was going on (does anyone actually believe that his COS or other staffers wouldn't have known about that and advised him earlier?).
If he does go through with his threat, he can definitely impose immediate shutdowns of the internet and impose media blackouts. This is a threat I believe we need to take very, very seriously. I saw that Schiff was just swatting this away as casually as you'd swat a pesky fly out of your face, but the whole thing could go off the rails pretty quick. We could be tied up in court battles ending at the SCOTUS - where the Rs are in the majority. Many of those seated on the bench adhere to the theory of the Unitary Executive, i.e., absolute and total executive power over all aspects of the government. tRump's nominee to the AG is one of them (though not yet confirmed), as is AAG Whittaker. And I believe McConnell is probably of that particular ideological theory. At any rate, he's using it to let Shitler pull his current shutdown stunt. And, of course, we all know that he exercised his own UE "right" when he failed to advance Merrick Garland's nomination to the bench, all the while decrying how Obama was a renegade abusing his Presidential right* by utilizing the Executive Order options.
Cold War Spook
(1,279 posts)and the stock markets free fall.
at140
(6,110 posts)Because he is addicted to Twitter!
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)democratisphere
(17,235 posts)And THAT is an emergency!
Stuart G
(38,414 posts)Why?...The real emergency is not the wall, it is that members of Trump's own family are about to be indicted for treason.... Very soon, and Trump can do nothing about it. That is the emergency. This wall is fake s**t to divert our attention away from the real issue that is soon to be here. Indictments of Trump's family.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)EarthFirst
(2,899 posts)...having recently crossed the border.
The entire situation is being fabricated on the fly daily.
Cousin Dupree
(1,866 posts)Why dont they call him out on this? They just run from crisis to crisis, story to story, and no one points out how were all being played.
at140
(6,110 posts)Money for the wall after the mid-terms were out of the way. Now that dog won't hunt!
apcalc
(4,463 posts)Funds, I think his own party will revolt.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)Not as a military unit, but as individuals, talking amongst themselves, slow-working his directives, etc.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... out if Syria yet?
Bleacher Creature
(11,256 posts)It should re-open the government, it will almost certainly be stopped by the courts, and it's an abuse of power that brings him one step closer to impeachment.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)He has no plausible reason to declare a national emergency. "Pelosi won't give me my wall" won't cut it.
SWBTATTReg
(22,098 posts)history have the will and desire of a majority of Americans been ignored so blatantly. States' rights will be trampled recklessly, the lands owned by many along the border will be seized and little or no compensation will be paid, more than likely. And why? Because of someone nefarious claim that the border is a serious problem. This is one that we as the US has been dealing w/ since day 1 of our existence. Why now? By this rationale, there can be no national emergency since the same thing has been going on since day 1 (migration, whatever else, along the border).
If stifling of the internet occurs, numerous first amendment lawsuits would immediately be filed and millions, no, make that 10s of millions would scream in protest. The internet is our new community centers of today's America. Markets would plunge and then the real damage would begin. A lot of commerce and activity occurs within the internet and a lot of people rely on it.
This is another very strong reason to rein in these powers of the presidency. If he can continue to use twitter, then he has no authority to shut down the internet, for if I remember, some of the internet infrastructure is also used by twitter.
Ilsa
(61,691 posts)Taking land by eminent domain isn't their thing. I would expect Texas landowners to block or destroy anything built on their land that separates them from the river.
Marie Marie
(9,999 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)BadgerKid
(4,550 posts)cstanleytech
(26,276 posts)Freethinker65
(10,008 posts)Might as well dissolve the Senate after all of Trumps non-qualified judges and other appointments have sailed through.
Mitch and the GOP have killed all checks and balances. The override is dead.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)orangecrush
(19,499 posts)CozyMystery
(652 posts)zanana1
(6,106 posts)In Trump world, I think it means "I'm not getting what I want and that's a national emergency".
Tom Rinaldo
(22,912 posts)to actually build his wall in the budget this year? And what type of leader is he if he couldn't get a Republican Congress to fund his wall for the last two years if there actually was a national emergency? And why did he turn down a deal that would have provided several times the amount he is asking for now for a wall in return for a DACA fix months ago? National Emergency my ass, even by his own warped standards Trump repeatedly has proven that it isn't.
Yeehah
(4,574 posts)It's just what they need to grab power. The sociopaths in the administration don't care about casualties; all they crave is power. But the real problem is the tens of millions of Americans who support this demented president.
Maxheader
(4,371 posts)to justify a .."national emergency"