Patricia Wald, pathbreaking federal judge who became chief of D.C. Circuit, dies at 90
Source: The Washington Post
By Adam Bernstein January 12 at 12:10 PM
Shortly before she graduated from Yale Law School in 1951, Patricia Wald secured a job interview with a white-collar Manhattan firm. The hiring partner was impressed with her credentials she was one of two women on the law review but lamented her timing.
Its really a shame, she recalled the man saying. If only you could have been here last week. A woman had been hired then, she was told, and it would be a long time before the firm considered bringing another on board.
Gradually, working nights and weekends while raising five children, she built a career in Washington as an authority on bail reform and family law. Working for a pro bono legal services group and an early public-interest law firm, she won cases that broadened protections for societys most vulnerable, including indigent women and children with special needs.
She became an assistant attorney general under President Jimmy Carter, who in 1979 appointed her to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit often described as the countrys most important bench after the U.S. Supreme Court. She was the first woman to serve on the D.C. Circuit court and was its chief judge from 1986 to 1991. Later, she was a member of the United Nations tribunal on war crimes and genocide in the former Yugoslavia.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/patricia-wald-pathbreaking-federal-judge-who-became-chief-of-dc-circuit-dies-at-90/2019/01/12/6ab03904-1688-11e9-803c-4ef28312c8b9_story.html
BumRushDaShow
(128,509 posts)What a remarkable career she had and a powerful influence on jurisprudence. I think the one thing that instantly impacted me was the last paragraph of the article -
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/patricia-wald-pathbreaking-federal-judge-who-became-chief-of-dc-circuit-dies-at-90/2019/01/12/6ab03904-1688-11e9-803c-4ef28312c8b9_story.html
Her take on basically making sure to spend the time to write a worthy dissent to a majority opinion for history's sake, really underscores how to handle the ebb and flow of these dark times that we have descended into - notably at the SCOTUS level.
riversedge
(70,089 posts)akraven
(1,975 posts)She will be missed.
Igel
(35,274 posts)is that she was appointed to an important court of appeals judgeship with no prior experience as a judge.
And that would be the official grounds for putting a hold on her nomination or saying nobody should vote for inexperience in such an important post.
getagrip_already
(14,642 posts)There is a huge difference between being an experienced federal attorney and having absolutely no credentials to practice law, let alone sit on a federal bench.
Patricia Wald was eminently qualified to become a judge, based on her experience and qualifications. That stands in stark contrast to trump appointees who hold virtually no qualifications for the posts they are appointed to.