Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

UpInArms

(51,280 posts)
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 10:02 PM Mar 2019

Former Trump adviser (Caputo) says he does not plan to cooperate with House Judiciary inquiry

Source: Washington Post

A former campaign aide for President Trump, one of 81 people to receive a request for documents this week from the House Judiciary Committee, has already informed the committee that he has no records responsive to their inquiries and he does not plan to testify in front of the panel.

The letter from an attorney for Michael Caputo, who worked for Trump during part of the 2016 campaign, represents the first skirmish in what is likely to be broad resistance from Trump aides and associates to new inquiries issued this week by the Judiciary Committee.

Caputo told The Washington Post that he has already begun coordinating with four other Trump associates who received requests from the committee this week to begin a joint strategy of resisting requests for testimony.

“All four are reluctant to appear because they believe it’s a perjury trap designed to move toward impeachment of the president,” he said.

Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/former-trump-adviser-says-he-does-not-plan-to-cooperate-with-house-judiciary-inquiry/2019/03/05/27ffd1e6-3f96-11e9-9361-301ffb5bd5e6_story.html



No trap if no one lies ...
29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Former Trump adviser (Caputo) says he does not plan to cooperate with House Judiciary inquiry (Original Post) UpInArms Mar 2019 OP
I read somewhere that only records that had already been produced for Mueller were requested, pnwmom Mar 2019 #1
Yep, good luck to those fools to try not complying onetexan Mar 2019 #8
amazing how people who lie think investigations are perjury traps just to get THEM lol nt msongs Mar 2019 #2
They're playing 'follow the leader'. SergeStorms Mar 2019 #17
It is easy to avoid a 'perjury trap'. Just tell the truth. That never occurs to them emulatorloo Mar 2019 #26
As stupid as Trump I guess. SergeStorms Mar 2019 #29
Coordinating with four other Trump associates? Isn't there a word for that? nt enough Mar 2019 #3
Obstruction of Justice and coordination to obstruct seems like RICO offense to me! The Wielding Truth Mar 2019 #5
I'm guessing you're not a lawyer onenote Mar 2019 #12
Then they all can pay a fine and go to jail together. watoos Mar 2019 #13
What about being coached or pressured to misslead or lie during a testimony? The Wielding Truth Mar 2019 #14
Of course one can't encourage or coach a witness to lie or mislead onenote Mar 2019 #20
Did you mean to say this? "can't" The Wielding Truth Mar 2019 #24
Yes. It is unethical to coach a witness to lie or mislead. onenote Mar 2019 #25
Using the word, unethical, is like placing a kitten in a swamp of hungry alligators when speaking The Wielding Truth Mar 2019 #28
Good, you fool. You'll be going to prison n/t DonaldsRump Mar 2019 #4
Let's HOPE they go to jail FiveGoodMen Mar 2019 #23
It's not a perjury trap if you don't commit perjury. TwilightZone Mar 2019 #6
Yeah, but those mean old Democrats PatSeg Mar 2019 #11
If someone working for HIllary or Barack refused, America would come to a screeching halt Eliot Rosewater Mar 2019 #7
Sounds like they think Trump will get impeached if they tell the truth Renew Deal Mar 2019 #9
Subpoena him. If he takes the 5th, investigate him for the crime he is hiding. Shrike47 Mar 2019 #10
Caputo said. Linda Ed Mar 2019 #15
All the best people, right. Is there no end to these slugs? Judi Lynn Mar 2019 #16
The Trump administration... SergeStorms Mar 2019 #18
Subpoenas will soon be flying out the door. Vinca Mar 2019 #19
Typical Republican bully. Big talker tough guy until he's confronted. Now cowers in a corner. Power 2 the People Mar 2019 #21
The committees need to come down especially hard on these initial refuseniks Danascot Mar 2019 #22
Pertinent questions aren't a perjury trap Midnightwalk Mar 2019 #27

pnwmom

(108,976 posts)
1. I read somewhere that only records that had already been produced for Mueller were requested,
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 10:04 PM
Mar 2019

so they couldn't argue they didn't have them.

onetexan

(13,036 posts)
8. Yep, good luck to those fools to try not complying
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 10:14 PM
Mar 2019

Dems can issue subpoenas for the documents. If they defy they will be held in contempt of Congress, a federal misdeneanor which carries potential for fines and jail time

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
17. They're playing 'follow the leader'.
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 03:50 AM
Mar 2019

Trump complained about "perjury traps" so they think that's a viable defense against the prying eyes of the investigators. Apparently they don't realize that they're not afforded the same "executive privilege" as the orange madman who's squatting in our Oval Office.

emulatorloo

(44,116 posts)
26. It is easy to avoid a 'perjury trap'. Just tell the truth. That never occurs to them
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 08:20 PM
Mar 2019

Honestly I am shocked that Manafort Flynn et al thought they could lie to the FBI and outsmart them. How stupid do you have to be.

SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
29. As stupid as Trump I guess.
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 09:42 PM
Mar 2019

Intelligence never was, and never will be, an imperative for a position in the Trump mal-administration.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
12. I'm guessing you're not a lawyer
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 11:48 PM
Mar 2019

Absent a court order, witnesses in criminal case are not barred from talking to each other. And this isn't a criminal trial, its a Congressional investigation. Nothing prevents those receiving subpoenas from fighting the subpoena and/or discussing strategy with respect to the subpoenas with others.

onenote

(42,694 posts)
20. Of course one can't encourage or coach a witness to lie or mislead
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 09:26 AM
Mar 2019

But its very hard to prove and cannot be presumed simply by the fact witnesses and/or their lawyers have discussed a case.

The Wielding Truth

(11,415 posts)
28. Using the word, unethical, is like placing a kitten in a swamp of hungry alligators when speaking
Thu Mar 7, 2019, 08:10 PM
Mar 2019

of Trump and his cohorts.

So, I would say that this group can coach and lie and mislead and has most probably done so.

My question now is," How does someone who knows the law stop this unethical behavior?"

DonaldsRump

(7,715 posts)
4. Good, you fool. You'll be going to prison n/t
Tue Mar 5, 2019, 10:08 PM
Mar 2019

If you're compelled testify before Congress, you testify or take the Fifth (which your people equated with guilt).

Otherwise, as Monopoly notes, "Go to Jail...Go Directly to Jail..."

Linda Ed

(493 posts)
15. Caputo said.
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 02:38 AM
Mar 2019

Caputo said. “It was an awful experience...once you get into that room, it’s fraught with peril.”

Dear Mr. caputo:
It is only fraught with peril if you or others you are involved with have done something wrong and then you lie about it.

Caputo lived in Russia for two decades but says he has no knowledge of any connections or contacts between the Trump campaign and agents of Moscow. He has launched a legal defense fund, collecting more than $10,000 from the public so far.

Caputo amends testimony to say a Russian offered dirt on Clinton
Caputo now wants the committee to know that in May 2016 he helped connect a Russian who was offering "dirt" on Hillary Clinton with Roger Stone, a friend who, like Caputo, was helping Donald Trump's campaign.
https://buffalonews.com/2018/06/17/caputo-amends-testimony-to-say-a-russian-offered-dirt-on-clinton/

Caputo is right up there with Roger Stone...Bet he will have to testify at his trial..The various ships and the rats that are leaving - burn it all down! Russia is corrupt. Trump is corrupt. You choose the company you keep.

Judi Lynn

(160,516 posts)
16. All the best people, right. Is there no end to these slugs?
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 02:55 AM
Mar 2019


Michael Caputo, looks as if he has the world by the ass, doesn't he? Hoping he has a big surprise ahead.







SergeStorms

(19,193 posts)
18. The Trump administration...
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 03:56 AM
Mar 2019

is going to set a record for indicted and convicted personnel that will never be broken. No other future administration will ever come close to the lawlessness of the Trump Crime Family. For that matter, no organized crime family will probably come close either, past, present, or future. These crooked bastards are in a league of their own.

Vinca

(50,261 posts)
19. Subpoenas will soon be flying out the door.
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 08:16 AM
Mar 2019

Caputo's a jerk who doesn't want to pay the price (lawyer fees) for loving the Criminal-In-Chief.

Danascot

(4,690 posts)
22. The committees need to come down especially hard on these initial refuseniks
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 12:55 PM
Mar 2019

Earlier in my career I acted as an owner's rep overseeing contractors in building projects. Early on I would go out of my way to look for something to make an issue of and make a total asshole of myself over it. That would get settled and from then on the job usually went smoothly and the contractors would be less likely to try to pull anything.

I think grade school teachers sometimes do something similar at the beginning of the term.

I think the same principle could be applied to the committees and their subpoenas. If the subpoena targets resist, the committee needs to initiate contempt of congress proceedings and threaten significant fines or jail time, and follow through quickly. If there are no consequences for ignoring subpoenas, many more will be encouraged to resist.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
27. Pertinent questions aren't a perjury trap
Wed Mar 6, 2019, 09:18 PM
Mar 2019

I’m not a lawyer but my understanding is that a perjury trap is a question that is asked only in the hope that the answer will be a lie.

Questions that are relevant don’t qualify.

Either way you can avoid perjury by not lying. This crowd is probably not capable if that.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Former Trump adviser (Cap...