Former Trump adviser (Caputo) says he does not plan to cooperate with House Judiciary inquiry
Source: Washington Post
A former campaign aide for President Trump, one of 81 people to receive a request for documents this week from the House Judiciary Committee, has already informed the committee that he has no records responsive to their inquiries and he does not plan to testify in front of the panel.
The letter from an attorney for Michael Caputo, who worked for Trump during part of the 2016 campaign, represents the first skirmish in what is likely to be broad resistance from Trump aides and associates to new inquiries issued this week by the Judiciary Committee.
Caputo told The Washington Post that he has already begun coordinating with four other Trump associates who received requests from the committee this week to begin a joint strategy of resisting requests for testimony.
All four are reluctant to appear because they believe its a perjury trap designed to move toward impeachment of the president, he said.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/politics/former-trump-adviser-says-he-does-not-plan-to-cooperate-with-house-judiciary-inquiry/2019/03/05/27ffd1e6-3f96-11e9-9361-301ffb5bd5e6_story.html
No trap if no one lies ...
pnwmom
(108,976 posts)so they couldn't argue they didn't have them.
onetexan
(13,036 posts)Dems can issue subpoenas for the documents. If they defy they will be held in contempt of Congress, a federal misdeneanor which carries potential for fines and jail time
msongs
(67,395 posts)SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)Trump complained about "perjury traps" so they think that's a viable defense against the prying eyes of the investigators. Apparently they don't realize that they're not afforded the same "executive privilege" as the orange madman who's squatting in our Oval Office.
emulatorloo
(44,116 posts)Honestly I am shocked that Manafort Flynn et al thought they could lie to the FBI and outsmart them. How stupid do you have to be.
SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)Intelligence never was, and never will be, an imperative for a position in the Trump mal-administration.
enough
(13,256 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)onenote
(42,694 posts)Absent a court order, witnesses in criminal case are not barred from talking to each other. And this isn't a criminal trial, its a Congressional investigation. Nothing prevents those receiving subpoenas from fighting the subpoena and/or discussing strategy with respect to the subpoenas with others.
watoos
(7,142 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)onenote
(42,694 posts)But its very hard to prove and cannot be presumed simply by the fact witnesses and/or their lawyers have discussed a case.
The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)onenote
(42,694 posts)The Wielding Truth
(11,415 posts)of Trump and his cohorts.
So, I would say that this group can coach and lie and mislead and has most probably done so.
My question now is," How does someone who knows the law stop this unethical behavior?"
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)If you're compelled testify before Congress, you testify or take the Fifth (which your people equated with guilt).
Otherwise, as Monopoly notes, "Go to Jail...Go Directly to Jail..."
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)Nothing's happened to Stone yet.
There may never be any justice.
TwilightZone
(25,464 posts)This isn't complicated.
PatSeg
(47,399 posts)are going to force him to lie using their evil liberal powers.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,109 posts)Renew Deal
(81,855 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Linda Ed
(493 posts)Caputo said. It was an awful experience...once you get into that room, its fraught with peril.
Dear Mr. caputo:
It is only fraught with peril if you or others you are involved with have done something wrong and then you lie about it.
Caputo lived in Russia for two decades but says he has no knowledge of any connections or contacts between the Trump campaign and agents of Moscow. He has launched a legal defense fund, collecting more than $10,000 from the public so far.
Caputo amends testimony to say a Russian offered dirt on Clinton
Caputo now wants the committee to know that in May 2016 he helped connect a Russian who was offering "dirt" on Hillary Clinton with Roger Stone, a friend who, like Caputo, was helping Donald Trump's campaign.
https://buffalonews.com/2018/06/17/caputo-amends-testimony-to-say-a-russian-offered-dirt-on-clinton/
Caputo is right up there with Roger Stone...Bet he will have to testify at his trial..The various ships and the rats that are leaving - burn it all down! Russia is corrupt. Trump is corrupt. You choose the company you keep.
Judi Lynn
(160,516 posts)Michael Caputo, looks as if he has the world by the ass, doesn't he? Hoping he has a big surprise ahead.
SergeStorms
(19,193 posts)is going to set a record for indicted and convicted personnel that will never be broken. No other future administration will ever come close to the lawlessness of the Trump Crime Family. For that matter, no organized crime family will probably come close either, past, present, or future. These crooked bastards are in a league of their own.
Vinca
(50,261 posts)Caputo's a jerk who doesn't want to pay the price (lawyer fees) for loving the Criminal-In-Chief.
Power 2 the People
(2,437 posts)Danascot
(4,690 posts)Earlier in my career I acted as an owner's rep overseeing contractors in building projects. Early on I would go out of my way to look for something to make an issue of and make a total asshole of myself over it. That would get settled and from then on the job usually went smoothly and the contractors would be less likely to try to pull anything.
I think grade school teachers sometimes do something similar at the beginning of the term.
I think the same principle could be applied to the committees and their subpoenas. If the subpoena targets resist, the committee needs to initiate contempt of congress proceedings and threaten significant fines or jail time, and follow through quickly. If there are no consequences for ignoring subpoenas, many more will be encouraged to resist.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)Im not a lawyer but my understanding is that a perjury trap is a question that is asked only in the hope that the answer will be a lie.
Questions that are relevant dont qualify.
Either way you can avoid perjury by not lying. This crowd is probably not capable if that.