Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,501 posts)
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 05:50 AM Mar 2019

Guggenheim Museum will no longer accept gifts from Sackler family, makers of opioid OxyContin

Source: ABC News

The opioid epidemic kills more than 100 people each day in the U.S.
By Mark Osborne 3h ago

Despite having their name on the museum's education center, the Guggenheim said it will no longer be accepting gifts from the Sackler family, according to a statement given to ABC News on Saturday. The Sacklers own Purdue Pharma, the makers of the powerful and addictive painkiller OxyContin.

The rejection of the wealthy pharmaceutical name isn't the biggest problem facing the Sacklers -- the company is reportedly exploring bankruptcy as a way to protect itself against million-dollar lawsuits -- but it is a shot at the societal standing of the billionaire family.

"The Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum received a total of $7 million in gifts from members of the Mortimer D. Sackler family initiated in 1995 and paid out through 2006 to establish and support the Sackler Center for Arts Education, which serves approximately 300,000 youth, adults, and families each year," the museum said in a statement.

It added, "An additional $2 million was received between 1999 and 2015 to support the museum. No contributions from the Sackler family have been received since 2015. No additional gifts are planned, and the Guggenheim does not plan to accept any gifts."

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/guggenheim-museum-longer-accept-gifts-sackler-family-makers/story?id=61904377

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Guggenheim Museum will no longer accept gifts from Sackler family, makers of opioid OxyContin (Original Post) Judi Lynn Mar 2019 OP
'This is blood money': Tate shuns Sacklers - and others urged to follow Judi Lynn Mar 2019 #1
I'm not sure this is such a good idea. LuvNewcastle Mar 2019 #2
Always loved this quote: dhol82 Mar 2019 #7
Yeah, I like that one too. LuvNewcastle Mar 2019 #10
Very cool. K&R ck4829 Mar 2019 #3
an important step. elleng Mar 2019 #4
Just curious. qwlauren35 Mar 2019 #5
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Mar 2019 #6
I think the problem was they knew it could be abused and still peddled it as safe dhol82 Mar 2019 #8
well done Amanpour & Company interview about OxyContin, big Pharma and Sacklers steventh Mar 2019 #9

Judi Lynn

(160,501 posts)
1. 'This is blood money': Tate shuns Sacklers - and others urged to follow
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 06:02 AM
Mar 2019

'This is blood money': Tate shuns Sacklers – and others urged to follow
Joanna Walters in New York
@Joannawalters13
Sun 24 Mar 2019 01.00 EDT

Earlier this year at the Guggenheim in New York, activists objecting to donations from the Sackler family draped protest banners from the museum’s famous spiraling balconies, dropped flyers down through the atrium and pretended to die all over the floor. A gobsmacked public looked on.

. . .

On Thursday, the Tate group announced it would not take any more donations from the Sacklers, the family whose most prominent billionaire members own the company that makes OxyContin, a prescription painkiller implicated in America’s opioids crisis.

The company, Purdue Pharma, and eight leading Sackler family members are being investigated and sued, accused of knowingly misleading the public about the dangers of OxyContin and profiting from sales and marketing strategies that deceived doctors and rewarded them for over-prescribing the drug.

Those cases are drawing increasing attention, as are protests by activists who want arts and academic institutions in the US, UK and elsewhere to eschew Sackler money.

More:
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2019/mar/24/sackler-money-tate-modern-art-nan-goldin-oxycontin

LuvNewcastle

(16,843 posts)
2. I'm not sure this is such a good idea.
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 07:55 AM
Mar 2019

If the money would be put to good use, why not take it? So many wealthy families out there have made their fortunes from slavery, war, and other forms of human degradation, yet their money isn't refused by anyone, certainly not by politicians. I guess if the Guggenheim won't take the money, maybe they'll donate it to equally deserving but lesser known institutions, so maybe this is good. But the Guggenheim probably wouldn't even be there if they refused donations from all the families with ill-gotten gains.

elleng

(130,822 posts)
4. an important step.
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 12:34 PM
Mar 2019

We, society, DO have to assert our values loud and clear, not something we've felt a need to do in the past.

Response to qwlauren35 (Reply #5)

dhol82

(9,352 posts)
8. I think the problem was they knew it could be abused and still peddled it as safe
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 06:34 PM
Mar 2019

The reps were selling it like crazy to the docs. That’s along with a bunch of perks.

steventh

(2,143 posts)
9. well done Amanpour & Company interview about OxyContin, big Pharma and Sacklers
Sun Mar 24, 2019, 07:44 PM
Mar 2019

I found the recent PBS interview of Beth Macy, author of Dopesick, very interesting. Sixteen minute video includes details about early history of the opioid crisis, how big Pharma aggressively promoted OxyContin, and the Sackler family relationship with the Metropolitan Museum.
http://www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/video/author-beth-macy-wts4ps/

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Guggenheim Museum will no...