Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,813 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:23 AM Mar 2019

U.S. Supreme Court backs Sudan in USS Cole bombing lawsuit

Last edited Tue Mar 26, 2019, 01:57 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: Reuters

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday prevented American sailors injured in the deadly 2000 al Qaeda bombing of the Navy destroyer USS Cole from collecting $314.7 million in damages from the government of Sudan for its alleged role in the attack.

In a 8-1 decision, the justices overturned a lower court’s decision that had allowed the sailors to collect the damages from certain banks that held Sudanese assets. The decision represented a major victory for Sudan, which denies that it provided any support to the al Qaeda militant group for the attack in Yemen.

Sudan was backed by President Donald Trump’s administration in the case.

A lower court had levied damages by default because Sudan did not defend itself against allegations that it provided support to the Islamist militant group.

-snip-

WORLD NEWS MARCH 26, 2019 / 10:16 AM / UPDATED 3 HOURS AGO
Andrew Chung
3 MIN READ


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-sudan/u-s-supreme-court-backs-sudan-in-uss-cole-bombing-lawsuit-idUSKCN1R71PQ



EDIT: article updated at link

Related: 16-1094 Republic of Sudan v. Harrison (Supreme Court of the United States)
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court backs Sudan in USS Cole bombing lawsuit (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2019 OP
wow NewJeffCT Mar 2019 #1
Thomas filed the lone decent so it must be a good decision Lochloosa Mar 2019 #3
The case involves a fine point. mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2019 #2
Maybe but....one would hope the ruling a.) stills states Sudan.... machoneman Mar 2019 #4

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,296 posts)
2. The case involves a fine point.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 10:46 AM
Mar 2019
This case concerns the requirements applicable to a particular method of serving civil process on a foreign state.

machoneman

(3,997 posts)
4. Maybe but....one would hope the ruling a.) stills states Sudan....
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 11:53 AM
Mar 2019

may be held liable under another filing and b.) the SC's offer a path to doing just that.

I won't hold my breath.....

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court backs ...