Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,823 posts)
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 02:07 PM Mar 2019

Supreme Court backs Alaska moose hunter over park service in broad ruling on jurisdiction

Source: Anchorage Daily News

A moose hunter whose case against the federal government made a rare second trip to the U.S. Supreme Court prevailed on Tuesday.

The ruling marks a win for Alaskans unhappy with federal “overreach” on some public lands but doesn’t topple rural subsistence rights as some feared it might.

John Sturgeon sued the National Park Service after rangers on the Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve in 2007 ordered him off the hovercraft he used for moose-hunting trips through the shallows of the Nation River near the Canadian border. The park service claimed the right to manage navigable waters inside parks and preserves. The state maintained that management of those waters was clearly left to the state, which allows hovercrafts.

U.S. Supreme Court justices in this week’s decision ruled unanimously that the Nation River doesn’t qualify as “public land” for the purposes of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. The sweeping 1980 law created 10 new national park units following natural boundaries rather than federally owned lands, adding more than 18 million acres of state, Native and private land.

-snip-

Author: Zaz Hollander | Updated: 13 minutes ago | Published 1 hour ago


Read more: https://www.adn.com/outdoors-adventure/2019/03/26/supreme-court-backs-alaska-moose-hunter-over-park-service-in-broad-ruling-on-jurisdiction/



Related: 17-949 Sturgeon v. Frost (Supreme Court of the United States)
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court backs Alaska moose hunter over park service in broad ruling on jurisdiction (Original Post) Eugene Mar 2019 OP
Misleading headline by Anchorage Daily News Freethinker65 Mar 2019 #1
It is both accurate and relevant. LanternWaste Mar 2019 #2
The decision was based upon who has legal rights to use and regulate a waterway Freethinker65 Mar 2019 #3

Freethinker65

(10,001 posts)
1. Misleading headline by Anchorage Daily News
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 02:26 PM
Mar 2019

Being a hunter, for moose or anything else, had nothing to do with the unanimous ruling.




 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
2. It is both accurate and relevant.
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 02:29 PM
Mar 2019

As he was a moose-hunter, and this case was predicated on a particular moose hunt, the headline is both accurate and relevant.

Freethinker65

(10,001 posts)
3. The decision was based upon who has legal rights to use and regulate a waterway
Tue Mar 26, 2019, 06:34 PM
Mar 2019

The headline may have been accurate, but I still feel it was misleading.

We agree to disagree on this.

Honestly there is so much more important stuff going on in the country right now, but I saw the headline and was angry until I read what the decision was really about.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court backs Alask...