Chicago sends letter trying to recoup $130K from Jussie Smollett
Source: Chicago Tribune
The city sent a letter to Smollett through his attorneys Thursday, demanding he pay $130,106 expended on overtime hours in the investigation of this matter.
If Smollett does not pay, the letter states the city may prosecute you for making a false statement to the city.
The City of Chicago and the Chicago Police Department take seriously those who make false statements to the police, thereby diverting resources from other investigations and undermining the criminal justice system, the letter signed by Corporation Counsel Ed Siskel reads in part. On January 29, 2019, you made a police report in which you falsely claimed that two men had attacked you while yelling racial and homophobic slurs.
Law Department spokesman Bill McCaffrey said the city wasnt committing to such a lawsuit. But he said the city has a lengthy and successful track record of recovering funds under a statute that makes a person liable for costs the city incurred to provide services related to the persons violation of the law.
Read more: https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-met-emanuel-smollett-costs-recovery-20190328-story.html
Mr.Bill
(24,249 posts)Sounds like it to me.
former9thward
(31,947 posts)The forfeit of his $10,000 bail. I think this letter is setting up a civil lawsuit against him.
Mr.Bill
(24,249 posts)may be prosecuted unless he pays them. That just doesn't sound like responsible justice to me. Either he committed a crime or he didn't. If he did prosecute him. Don't put a price on not being prosecuted.
Harker
(13,985 posts)If they think they can prove criminality, they should arrest him and prosecute him.
This approach comes off like a shakedown.
christx30
(6,241 posts)Has been for a century. Maybe favors were called in. Maybe the prosecution screwed up big time, and they are dropping the charges and sealing the whole thing to cover it up. Who knows?
The FBI is taking over the case. We may see some federal prosecutions of the people involved. I love seeing politicians go to prison. It doesnt happen often enough for my tastes.
Pisces
(5,599 posts)The bill and apologize for the lies and wasted time
Mario Luigi
(23 posts)Devil Child
(2,728 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,249 posts)I wonder (pure speculation) if there's something about the two guys he hired not having their stories straight and they can't be relied upon to be credible witnesses.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)unc70
(6,109 posts)Sounds like some variant of extortion to me.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,165 posts)rocktivity
(44,572 posts)You forfeit your presumption of innocence when you choose the option of forfeiting your bond.
rocktivity
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)former9thward
(31,947 posts)rocktivity
(44,572 posts)which makes it a plea deal and a conviction, NOT an exoneration.
rocktivity
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)Today, all criminal charges against Jussie Smollett were dropped and his record has been wiped clean of the filing of this tragic complaint against him, his lawyers said in a statement Tuesday, continuing to maintain that Smollett was a victim and vilified and made to appear as a perpetrator as a result of false and inappropriate remarks made to the public causing an inappropriate rush to judgement.
Were very happy for this result and we are very anxious for Jussie to get on with his career and his life, Smollett attorney Patricia Brown Holmes said during a press conference shortly after the statement.
Holmes declined to comment about the details of the case, saying that it had spiraled out of control.
We have nothing to say to the police department, except to investigate charges and not try cases in the press, Holmes said.
The case has been sealed, and the office of Cook County States Attorney Kim Foxx said it had reached an agreement with Smollett and his attorneys rather than a plea deal, so Smollett will not be required to perform community service.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)from Smollet's family. Nothing to see here.
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)There's no other way to view it. Do community service (joke; 16 hrs) give us 10000.00 & we'll drop the charges. Thats a DEAL
Pisces
(5,599 posts)oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)You dont see it expressed much because theres no evidence that supports his innocence.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)We heard from the police and two witnesses who said he put them up to it. I don't think they're American citizens either which makes them vulnerable IMO.
kcr
(15,315 posts)And the public ate it up. But there is very little actual evidence that says he wasn't a victim, and that's why they dropped the charges.
AKing
(511 posts)double jeopardy supposedly wouldn't attach. This is per ABC7 news Chicago. Watch the video starting about 1:50 into it.
[link:https://abc7chicago.com/jussie-smolletts-surprise-deal-raises-new-questions/5223062/|
ripcord
(5,278 posts)This may be a way for other city departments to try and get the evidence in this case before a jury.
clementine613
(561 posts)So, yes, Smollet has not been in jeopardy for this offense.
bitterross
(4,066 posts)This is just one more oddity in an already over-done, overplayed event/non-event.
I would complete refuse to pay this. It seems like the city is trying to alter the plea deal. That's not right.
LiberalFighter
(50,789 posts)former9thward
(31,947 posts)The money was spent investigating the alleged crime. After that nothing. The Judges, police, prosecutors all get paid whether they are prosecuting Smollet or Mary Smith.
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)Cities should do this more often
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)He didn't plead nolo, he wasn't tried, charges were dropped. They need to charge him and try him or let it go.
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)Nobody should bitch when the hollywood types get off with a fine for the school buying scandal
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)Not even a nolo plea.
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)If there wasnt a deal, he would've gotten his 10000 back. He's guilty as hell and EVERYONE knows it, unless they have an agenda. Otherwise, why havent the brothers been arrested?
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)to pay is a dangerous precedent.
Submariner
(12,498 posts)These actors need to stay anonymous to be effective actors. Who will want to see him on the big screen now?
I don't see Tom Cruise as 'Maverick' and John Travolta as anything, anymore, I see Scientology freaks. Can't watch racist birther Jon Voight spoil the Ray Donovan show for me.
Now Smollett will be seen on screen as the fake MAGA victim that cried wolf, instead of the character he is supposed to portray.
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)Rewarding his behavior.
Hopefully Fox will keep him off the show for good. If not, i hope the show fails next season.
obamanut2012
(26,047 posts)What a horrific precedent this would set.
onetexan
(13,024 posts)This is not the way the police should be conducting themselves.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Last edited Thu Oct 6, 2022, 12:23 AM - Edit history (15)
Court records show (that) he pleaded no contest...to driving under the influence...driving without a valid license...(and) the reduced charge of giving false information...The records show he later completed an alcohol education and treatment program and completed the terms of his sentence in May 2008.
So he isn't a stranger to being arrested, taking a plea deal, OR being accused of lying to the police? If State Attorney Kim Foxx didn't have that information, she most certainly should have. Well, now we have the missing piece of the puzzle: while Foxx should have dismissed the charges and returned Jussie's bond money if she thought the cops had screwed up that badly, it now makes sense why Jussie "voluntarily agreed" to do some community service and forfeit his bond.
But as I said upthread, Jussie forfeited his presumption of innocence when he forfeited his bond, and now he can also wave buh-bye to his moral high ground. Game over, Jussie: coffin lid, meet nails -- check, please!
rocktivity
oldsoftie
(12,492 posts)Sound familiar?
Stellar
(5,644 posts)gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)I don't know what the real deal is with his case but he wasn't convicted of anything so good luck trying to collect on that. I do know that he offered to forfeit his bail to the city of Chicago.
former9thward
(31,947 posts)It does not depend on a criminal conviction. In fact the burden of proof is considerably lower than a criminal case would be. As an example the OJ case where he was found not guilty but found liable in a civil lawsuit.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)It sounds like they sent him a bill. They're threatening prosecution for making a false statement. That's not civil it's criminal.
former9thward
(31,947 posts)They can also opt to refile charges criminally but I doubt that will happen. The lawsuit will accomplish everything they want.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)certainly sends particular demographics into a wee frenzy.
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Fix The Stupid
(947 posts)Go ahead, make this more polarizing than it already it is...
Make the assumption that they are only suing this POS because he is black...
This place is an effing joke sometimes. Fantasy land...
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)You'll have to try harder than this, though!
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)I'm giving you an opportunity to step your fuckin' game up, my good man...
rocktivity
(44,572 posts)Response to former9thward (Original post)
rocktivity This message was self-deleted by its author.