Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

trailmonkee

(2,681 posts)
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 12:37 AM Sep 2012

Netanyahu deputy disagrees on setting Iran "red line"

Source: REUTERS

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Benjamin Netanyahu's deputy for intelligence and atomic affairs on Thursday broke with the Israeli prime minister's call for Iran to be confronted with a "red line" beyond which its disputed nuclear program would face military attack.

In a broadcast interview, Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor appeared to side with the United States in balking at Netanyahu's repeated demand that it set Iran an ultimatum or risk seeing Israel launch region-rattling unilateral strikes.

Meridor's remarks also underscored debate within the leader's inner circle about potentially exacerbating the rift with Washington with a war that polls show most Israelis, including several senior security figures, would oppose.

"I don't want to set red lines or deadlines for myself," Meridor, one of several Netanyahu deputies who form the core of his security cabinet, told Israel's Army Radio when asked how much time remained before force against Iran should be used.


Read more: http://ca.news.yahoo.com/netanyahu-deputy-disagrees-setting-iran-red-line-032843354.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Netanyahu deputy disagrees on setting Iran "red line" (Original Post) trailmonkee Sep 2012 OP
Good, time for cooler and saner heads to take over. mountain grammy Sep 2012 #1
Dunno about WWIII....... AverageJoe90 Sep 2012 #2
Yup, Romney's the deciding factor on this one Scootaloo Sep 2012 #3
Well obviously the war hawks will say Iran has already crossed all "red lines." David__77 Sep 2012 #4
 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
2. Dunno about WWIII.......
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:45 AM
Sep 2012

But a war 10x worse than Vietnam? Probably......and losing the ground war won't be the only thing we'll have to worry about, either.(can you say "nuclear terrorism", anybody? )

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
3. Yup, Romney's the deciding factor on this one
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 02:49 AM
Sep 2012

I'm not sure why the Obama campaign isn't pumping that... it's cold, hard fact.

Mitt Romney will throw the United States into another land war in the middle east.

He will be doing so at the behest of a US client state, no less! Say what shit you want about George Bush, but at least that asshole had enough brains to tell Georgia to get bent when they tried to suck us into a war against Russia.

David__77

(23,367 posts)
4. Well obviously the war hawks will say Iran has already crossed all "red lines."
Fri Sep 14, 2012, 03:31 AM
Sep 2012

Just as they claimed with Iraq in 2003. This is a predetermined game, which is why we cannot fall into the trap.

With diplomatic engagement, including restoration of full diplomatic relations, the political pole in Iran favoring accommodation with the West will emerge much stronger. What is happening now only strengthens the hand of radicalism.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Netanyahu deputy disagree...