Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AlwaysRandy

(21 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 12:03 PM Apr 2019

See Which Sections of the Mueller Report Were Redacted"

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Yonnie3 (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).

Source: New York Times

About 10 percent of the special counsel’s 448-page report is blacked out. A bird’s-eye view of the report reveals the pattern of redactions. More is kept secret in the first volume of the report, which covers Russian interference in the 2016 election, than in the second, which covers possible obstruction of justice.

Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/04/19/us/politics/redacted-mueller-report.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage



I think the New York Times has some fantastic computerized analysis of the redactions. I just knew that they, and others, would have a way to analyze the report. I am guessing that Rachel Maddow is doing this with a staff of readers. I also would not be surprised that the way in which the report is written by Mueller allows it to be quickly and succinctly analyzed and interpreted. Based on where Robert Mueller has been I am also guessing that he has outsmarted everyone on this and has laid some minefields that will continue to explode.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
See Which Sections of the Mueller Report Were Redacted" (Original Post) AlwaysRandy Apr 2019 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #1
thank you ---does the correction address this AlwaysRandy Apr 2019 #2
Yes. My post is now moot, will delete. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #3
Thanks. Interesting stuff. lamp_shade Apr 2019 #4
Awesome effort by the New York Times!!! Auggie Apr 2019 #5
The Guardian says there were over ONE THOUSAND redactions!! niyad Apr 2019 #6
Locking after a review by hosts Yonnie3 Apr 2019 #7

Response to AlwaysRandy (Original post)

AlwaysRandy

(21 posts)
2. thank you ---does the correction address this
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 12:14 PM
Apr 2019

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,000 posts)
3. Yes. My post is now moot, will delete. . . . nt
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 12:19 PM
Apr 2019

lamp_shade

(14,828 posts)
4. Thanks. Interesting stuff.
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 12:56 PM
Apr 2019

Auggie

(31,167 posts)
5. Awesome effort by the New York Times!!!
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 01:19 PM
Apr 2019

niyad

(113,278 posts)
6. The Guardian says there were over ONE THOUSAND redactions!!
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 01:37 PM
Apr 2019

Yonnie3

(17,434 posts)
7. Locking after a review by hosts
Fri Apr 19, 2019, 10:43 PM
Apr 2019

The Forum hosts have determined that this article is analysis.

Statement of Purpose for Latest Breaking News

Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.


Please repost in Editorials & Other Articles or General Discussion.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»See Which Sections of the...