Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(48,968 posts)
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 12:45 PM Apr 2019

Defense Department to take over background investigations for federal government

Source: The Hill

President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order transferring responsibility for conducting background checks from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to the Defense Department.

"The primary responsibility for conducting background investigations Government-wide be transferred from the Office of Personnel Management to the Department of Defense (DoD)," the order said, citing "needed reforms" as part of the reason for the change.

Under the order, the department will change the name of the the Defense Security Service (DSS) to the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA). The DCSA will be the primary agency charged with conducting background checks for the federal government.

-snip-

"This executive order reflects the administration's commitment to reform the personnel vetting enterprise to ensure a trusted federal workforce and achieve an efficient, effective, and secure operation that meets all government-wide needs for background investigations," the Defense Department said in a statement.

-snip

Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/defense/440658-defense-department-to-take-over-background-investigations-for-federal



Anyone trust the admin's reasons for doing this?
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Defense Department to take over background investigations for federal government (Original Post) highplainsdem Apr 2019 OP
No, not one teeny, tiny bit. Nt Phoenix61 Apr 2019 #1
Weeding out those not loyal to Trump? Freethinker65 Apr 2019 #2
Preparing to restock his adminstration with grifters, I'd guess William Seger Apr 2019 #3
Gets him one step further away from Congressional oversight of... TreasonousBastard Apr 2019 #4
The Defense Department by default can cite national security as excuse to hide records ArizonaLib Apr 2019 #5
+1 "Dems need to pass LAWS reforming the process" lagomorph777 Apr 2019 #19
What happens to Tricia Newbold and other rank and file at OPM who did this work? Justice Apr 2019 #6
OPM had hired a contractor to do the work. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2019 #7
Damn. Beat me to it. BumRushDaShow Apr 2019 #9
What do you want to bet not fooled Apr 2019 #8
War Department RicROC Apr 2019 #10
Now make it retroactive and revet everyone. jiminvegas Apr 2019 #11
this, right here. Right now. truthisfreedom Apr 2019 #17
With that pack of slippery rodents, you know there is an ulterior motive ....... Firestorm49 Apr 2019 #12
If Trump wasn't involved, I'd say this is a pretty good move jmowreader Apr 2019 #13
Just in time for the 2020 Census! icymist Apr 2019 #14
And don't forget that the pResident is the Commander in Chief of the DOD, Stonepounder Apr 2019 #15
Every seasonal worker needs a background check idahoblue Apr 2019 #16
He is trying to close OPM neohippie Apr 2019 #18

Freethinker65

(10,009 posts)
2. Weeding out those not loyal to Trump?
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 12:49 PM
Apr 2019

Making requests for more money for defense department that Trump can use as his slush fund?

ArizonaLib

(1,242 posts)
5. The Defense Department by default can cite national security as excuse to hide records
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 01:02 PM
Apr 2019

The OPM can't, usually. This allows for much more secrecy, much more difficulty to obtain FOIA records for the public, and reductions in funding/easier to circumvent control procedures - like those under scrutiny for Don Jr., Jared Kushner, and the others. More dismantling of the administrative state.

Dems need to pass LAWS reforming the process, not just leaving it up to Republican administrations to do whatever they want. If Dems/Libs don't want republican administrations gutting regulations, regulations must be made into legislation and passed as laws.

Please call your congress person!

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
19. +1 "Dems need to pass LAWS reforming the process"
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 11:24 AM
Apr 2019

Trump is definitely up to something here. Something extremely dangerous.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,396 posts)
7. OPM had hired a contractor to do the work.
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 01:10 PM
Apr 2019

The background checks were not being done in-house.

IIRC, there had been some slip-ups.

BumRushDaShow

(128,859 posts)
9. Damn. Beat me to it.
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 01:43 PM
Apr 2019

I was just gonna say that much of that is contracted out. I know because I think around 2010 or so, I had to re-up and login and use eQip to update (they were so backlogged in the '80s and '90s that they blew past the 10-year and then a 15 year, but they finally had a contract guy come to my office to do the interview).

not fooled

(5,801 posts)
8. What do you want to bet
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 01:29 PM
Apr 2019

that at some point the background investigations get linked up with i360, the massive database the 666kook666 brothers have amassed on almost every American of voting age. i360 includes extensive information on voting behavior and political affiliation harvested from online activities.

So, people who e.g. are registered Democrats and frequent DU could be deemed ineligible to be Federal workers.

It's coming if red don remains in office.

This is a fascist country.

RicROC

(1,204 posts)
10. War Department
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 02:22 PM
Apr 2019

Let's go back to the old name because it more precisely defines the function of that department.

Firestorm49

(4,032 posts)
12. With that pack of slippery rodents, you know there is an ulterior motive .......
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 05:08 PM
Apr 2019

And we’ll find out more about it when they start rounding up “subversives”. (Just kidding, of course)

jmowreader

(50,555 posts)
13. If Trump wasn't involved, I'd say this is a pretty good move
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 07:01 PM
Apr 2019

Except for the Department of Energy and the intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense probably has more cleared people than the rest of the government put together. Hence, giving the Army the authority to clear the relatively small number of classified-information-using employees in the rest of the government isn't all that bad of an idea.

Donald Trump, however, has nefarious intent here. You know he does.

Stonepounder

(4,033 posts)
15. And don't forget that the pResident is the Commander in Chief of the DOD,
Thu Apr 25, 2019, 09:07 PM
Apr 2019

so all he has to say is "Give this guy a Top Secret Clearance and don't bother vetting him, he's the guy I want. And, as this would be a lawful order, the DOD would have to comply.

idahoblue

(377 posts)
16. Every seasonal worker needs a background check
Fri Apr 26, 2019, 12:49 AM
Apr 2019

The are already way behind, summer workers should be starting in May. They used to be able to work while the security check is pending but no more.
I am talking about trail crew, not anything to do with national security.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Defense Department to tak...