Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,525 posts)
Fri May 24, 2019, 03:32 PM May 2019

A Utah judge who made anti-Trump comments has been suspended without pay for six months

Source: Salt Lake Tribune


Published: 4 hours ago
Updated: 2 hours ago

A Taylorsville justice court judge who has been on the bench for more than two decades will be suspended for six months without pay for making politically charged comments about President Donald Trump from the bench and on social media.

In a decision released late Thursday, Utah’s high court ruled that Judge Michael Kwan violated their code of conduct on several occasions.

In January 2017, Kwan had an exchange that appeared to demean a defendant, according to the opinion, and included political commentary related to Trump’s immigration and tax policies.

The conversation in question revolved around whether a defendant had been paying their fines. The person said they had planned to use their tax return to pay what they owed.


Read more: https://www.sltrib.com/news/2019/05/24/utah-judge-who-made-anti/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A Utah judge who made anti-Trump comments has been suspended without pay for six months (Original Post) Judi Lynn May 2019 OP
Ahh, America, nice while it lasted Eliot Rosewater May 2019 #1
Oh come on mahina May 2019 #7
Hard to expect abqtommy May 2019 #2
maybe a gofundme is in order. nt yaesu May 2019 #3
We've had GOPer judges removed for doing the same sort of things. marble falls May 2019 #4
From the Associated Press... Eugene May 2019 #5
Sounds like he was punished for simply speaking the truth as the tax cuts benefitted cstanleytech May 2019 #6
When he's on the bench he has to be neutral bitterross May 2019 #9
I know but it was essentially the truth still. cstanleytech May 2019 #10
He should be suspended w/o pay. He was out of line. bitterross May 2019 #8
Now do Brett Kavanaugh jvill May 2019 #11
SC Justices are immune Polybius May 2019 #15
Good....never make political statmenets from the Bench AncientGeezer May 2019 #12
It doesn't matter that the judge was factually correct. He was out of line. TomSlick May 2019 #13
He made this pronouncement from the bench Jake Stern May 2019 #14

Eugene

(61,874 posts)
5. From the Associated Press...
Fri May 24, 2019, 03:56 PM
May 2019
Utah judge suspended for making anti-Trump comments

On Trump's inauguration day, Jan. 20, 2017, he posted: ""Welcome to governing. Will you dig your heels in and spend the next four years undermining our country's reputation and standing in the world? . . . Will you continue to demonstrate your inability to govern and political incompetence?"

The next month, he posted: "Welcome to the beginning of the fascist takeover. . . We need to be diligent in questioning Congressional Republicans if they are going to be the American Reichstag and refuse to stand up for the Constitution, refuse to uphold their oath of office and enable the tyrants to consolidate their power."

The ruling suspending Kwan also cited an interaction in court with a defendant in January 2017 in which Kwan criticized Trump after the defendant said he would use his tax return to pay fines.

"You do realize that we have a new president, and you think we are getting any money back?" Kwan said.


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/utah-judge-suspended-making-anti-trump-comments-63258536

cstanleytech

(26,286 posts)
6. Sounds like he was punished for simply speaking the truth as the tax cuts benefitted
Fri May 24, 2019, 04:15 PM
May 2019

the wealthy far more than the average person.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
9. When he's on the bench he has to be neutral
Fri May 24, 2019, 05:29 PM
May 2019

He said all of that while on the bench. That's out of line.

 

bitterross

(4,066 posts)
8. He should be suspended w/o pay. He was out of line.
Fri May 24, 2019, 05:29 PM
May 2019

I wouldn't approve of a GOP-leaning judge doing the same thing. I don't approve of him doing it.

Polybius

(15,390 posts)
15. SC Justices are immune
Sat May 25, 2019, 11:28 AM
May 2019

They can be impeached, that's it, but none would be impeached for trash-talking a President.

TomSlick

(11,097 posts)
13. It doesn't matter that the judge was factually correct. He was out of line.
Fri May 24, 2019, 08:32 PM
May 2019

Judges must keep their political views to themselves.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
14. He made this pronouncement from the bench
Fri May 24, 2019, 09:35 PM
May 2019

not on his personal Twitter account.

While what he said is correct it calls his ability to be impartial into question.

Going with Utah on this one.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»A Utah judge who made ant...