Chicago mayor seeks injunction to end teachers strike
Source: CHICAGO (CNN)
The week-old teachers strike in Chicago's public schools will continue into the new week, after a representative group of the Chicago Teachers Union decided not to end the strike even though union leaders and school officials had reached a tentative contract deal.
The move left Mayor Rahm Emanuel vowing to go to court to force teachers back to work, calling Sunday's actions by the union "a delay of choice that is wrong for our children."
The mayor announced in a statement that he's asked city lawyers "to file an injunction in circuit court to immediately end this strike." He contended the strike is illegal because "it is over issues that are deemed by state law to be non-strikable, and it endangers the health and safety of our children."
"I will not stand by while the children of Chicago are played as pawns in an internal dispute within a union," Emanuel said.
Read more: http://www.news4jax.com/news/Chicago-mayor-seeks-injunction-to-end-teachers-strike/-/475880/16621542/-/item/0/-/dqbwuw/-/index.html
marmar
(77,077 posts)nt
My thoughts exactly.
leftyohiolib
(5,917 posts)a union" therefore i will use the kids as pawns to force the teachers to accept orders from the dictator.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)nuff said..
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 17, 2012, 12:35 AM - Edit history (1)
It's okay for Rahm to use the kids as pawns, but the teachers can't.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)The last polling I saw shows most parents are still behind the teachers.
Plaid Adder
(5,518 posts)If you want to know how weak support for labor is in this country, listen to a bunch of middle-class parents discuss the Chicago teachers' strike. It is extremely depressing. Yes, it's a huge pain in the ass to have to scramble for child care. But the idea of suffering a short-term inconvenience in order to get a long-term gain seems to ahve very little traction with them.
The Plaid Adder
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)and Rahmbo will win.
Honestly, I'm unnerved by the level of passive acquiescence to the plight of unions in the US right now.
Karen Lewis is electrifying but even she can't hold public opinion forever. I was hoping for a resolution today. I trust the CTU and Lewis to get this done right, and I'm sure Lewis knows the political climate, but if they become insulated in a bubble, that would be bad.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)One of the many smart things Karen Lewis did BEFORE the strike was build community support. She spent 5 years building coalitions with parent and community groups. There's a bond there that isn't going to be broken by a strike. The parents want schools improved just as much as the teachers.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/16/us/illinois-chicago-teachers-strike/index.html
That is a winner of a meme, and I've seen it already on several outlets.
Robb
(39,665 posts)They decided not to vote to accept or reject the contract proposal, but Lewis said the majority of delegates don't support the contract as it stands.
Why not simply vote to reject, rather than elect not to vote? Is the leadership trying to convince the delegates it's a good deal?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)issued in the am to either force a vote, or force the union back to work.
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)My assumption is if the contract was great, and had everything they wanted, they would have urged their members to vote yes, and held the full vote. If it was horrible they would have not voted at all.
As it stand, my assumption is there are some points they like, and some they don't so they want to discuss it with their members for 2 days, and hold a vote on tuesday.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)"A clear majority wanted to stay out. That's why we are staying out," Lewis told a news conference after a three-hour meeting of the delegates.
SNIP
Before the meeting of delegates on Sunday, Lewis had called the agreement a "good contract." But after the decision to extend the strike she backtracked, saying: "This is not a good deal. This is the deal we got."
http://www.cnbc.com/id/49056257
Karen Lewis may not realize this, but having the delegates stand could be construed as a vote--and a vote to reject. Under SB7, the teachers do not get to strike for non-economic issues, and I think that the city could make a credible case that non-economic issues are still being bargained for.
ancianita
(36,030 posts)I saw it in that contract outline the rank and file are considering today. As long as teachers are considering the "Wellness" program being offered as an opt-in medical coverage plan in that 23 page outline, they still have strike-worthy issues on the table.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Is CTU really against a 'Wellness' plan?
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)By statute, teachers can only strike on "compensation" issues. This language was put in there to put the union in a trick bag. The city can argue that all the teachers are striking about is money for their members if there is a strike. The city can then say they did not take away their right to strike.
CTU is going to argue that the wellness program goes to compensation and thus strikable.
If this strike is ruled illegal then the union might be on the hook for private damages from every parent who has to pay for babysitting or misses a day of work. That would be a large number.
proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)That's the sense I got from various emails and Facebook postings by Chicago teachers. The Jewish holiday also put a crunch on time today. So they decided to wait, give the delegates 48 hours to study the agreement and come back together as a body on Tuesday. It sounds like they will be voting then.
Plaid Adder
(5,518 posts)Apart from his own, of course; but his kids are safely ensconced at the Lab School, where teacher performance is not tied to student test results.
@#$!.
THe Plaid Adder
chuckstevens
(1,201 posts)Can you say ONE TERM Mayor?
Iwillnevergiveup
(9,298 posts)and it sounds very good.
Was very happy when Rham left the Obama administration, and it will be nice to see him depart the mayor's spot as well. Wonder how many teachers voted for him only to be smacked down.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)Here's to you Rahm!
PBpbpbpbpbpbpbpb!
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)They want time to study the contract before they vote and he wants to push them into taking it as is. One thing that I'm impressed with is the union bureaucracy in this particular case. The SEEM to be allowing the membership a leading role in accepting or rejecting the contract. I like that.
I sincerely hope that if the legal system gets involved, other unions get involved too. Shut Chicago down and see how long Rham holds out.
ancianita
(36,030 posts)They filed an intent form with the board last week. So, this could grow...
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)I want to see the private sector unions (however weak they are) get involved too, even if it's just a short term "sympathy" strike. You also need supporters on the streets in mass demonstrations. Because of Taft-Hartley all of those actions are illegal, but it needs to happen. If you win the strike, you can get any violations of T-H dismissed. The important thing is to win the strike, ESPECIALLY if Emmanuel is going to be a dick about it and get the courts involved.
ancianita
(36,030 posts)Your concern is appreciated.
Rahm's losing on the court front and the union's filed a complaint with the NLRB over his tactics.
The CTU's done with 'selling' education and now is in the struggle stage. As time passes, perhaps even the engineers union will join, which they have for most of past strikes. Disinfo is having some effect on young unionists, but their is sufficient good info sources on the nets to help them learn their rights in order to hang tough enough to continue.
ancianita
(36,030 posts)alp227
(32,019 posts)And now he wants to boss around TEACHERS despite having the mouth of an immature third grader? "Retarded HAHAHAHAHAA" What a troll.