Michael Flynn's sentencing set for Jan. 28 after judge rejects his attacks on the FBI
Source: Washington Post
A federal judge on Monday rejected Michael Flynns attacks against the FBI and the Justice Department, setting a long-delayed sentencing for President Trumps former national security adviser for Jan. 28.U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of Washington, D.C. dismissed Flynns motion to find prosecutors in contempt. In a 92-page decision, Sullivan ruled there was no basis for Flynns allegations that federal law enforcement officials entrapped the retired three-star Army general into accepting a plea deal and that special counsel Robert S. Mueller IIIs prosecutors had not wrongfully held back 50 requests for evidence from Flynns attorneys.
Flynn, who pleaded guilty to lying to investigators about his interactions with Russias ambassador after the 2016 U.S. election, had been set to be sentenced Dec. 18. Sullivan this month delayed the sentencing pending a report by a Justice Department inspector general on how the FBI handled the Russia investigation, which reviewed topics related to Flynns allegations. The report from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz released last week found that the FBI was justified in opening its 2016 probe into possible coordination between Russia and four members of the Trump campaign, including Flynn. But the report also found the FBI made significant errors or omissions in applying for intelligence surveillance warrants for one of them, former campaign adviser Carter Page.
Sullivan reviewed Flynns more detailed accusations that misconduct by the FBI, Justice Department and Muellers office raised ethical concerns and cast doubt on his investigation, but denied defense claims that they warranted tossing out his plea in favor of a trial or dismissal of his case. Similar to Horowitzs findings, the court ruling undercut arguments that the FBI investigation or Justice Department prosecution of Flynn was unjustified or improperly handled.
Refuting Flynns claims that he was misled into unwittingly plead guilty to charges, Sullivan wrote that it was undisputed that Flynn told the same lies to the FBI, Vice President Pence, and senior White House officials, who repeated them to the American public, leading to his firing in Feb. 2017. The sworn statements of Mr. Flynn and his former counsel belie his new claims of innocence and his new assertions that he was pressured into pleading guilty to making materially false statements to the FBI, Sullivan wrote.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/michael-flynns-sentencing-set-for-jan-28-after-judge-rejects-his-attacks-on-the-fbi-justice-department/2019/12/16/269ae816-f4dd-11e9-a285-882a8e386a96_story.html
Full headline: Michael Flynns sentencing set for Jan. 28 after judge rejects his attacks on the FBI, Justice Department
pecosbob
(7,537 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)had similar issues with Manafort with his reneging of his plea deal (the lying and the lying)...
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)TeamPooka
(24,221 posts)marble falls
(57,077 posts)pecosbob
(7,537 posts)We've already got Dwayne Herbert Mountain Dew Camacho in the White House.
keithbvadu2
(36,775 posts)OhNo-Really
(3,985 posts)Firestorm49
(4,032 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)machI
(1,285 posts)What is taking so long?
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)and promised to cooperate and then rescinded that.
Too late! Wasn't loyal enough.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,844 posts)In Drumpf-world, the word is the bond and if there is any equivocating, you're toast.