Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

appalachiablue

(41,114 posts)
Mon Dec 30, 2019, 05:29 PM Dec 2019

US Has Slowest Population Growth Rate In A Century As Births Decline

Source: The Guardian

Increasing deaths and the slowdown of migration also contributed to slowest growth rate since first world war. The past year’s population growth rate in the United States was the slowest in a century due to declining births, increasing deaths and the slowdown of international migration, according to figures released Monday by the US Census Bureau.

The US grew from 2018 to 2019 by almost a half per cent, or about 1.5 million people, with the population standing at 328 million this year, according to population estimates. That’s the slowest growth rate in the US since 1917 to 1918, when the nation was involved in the first world war, said William Frey, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution.

For the first time in decades, natural increase – the number of births minus the number of deaths – was less than 1 million in the US due to an aging population of Baby Boomers, whose oldest members entered their 70s within the past several years. As the large Boomer population continues to age, this trend is going to continue.

Some of these things are locked into place. With the aging of the population, as the Baby Boomers move into their 70s and 80s, there are going to be higher numbers of deaths,” Frey said. “That means proportionately fewer women of child bearing age, so even if they have children, it’s still going to be less. Four states had a natural decrease, where deaths outnumbered births: West Virginia, Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont. For the first time this decade, Puerto Rico had a population increase...



Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/dec/30/us-population-growth-census-2020



..“Immigration is a wildcard in that it is something we can do something about,” Frey said. “Immigrants tend to be younger and have children, and they can make a population younger.”

10 states that had population declines in the past year include: NY, lost almost 77,000 people; IL, lost almost 51,000 residents; WV, lost more than 12,000 people; LS, lost almost 11,000 residents; and CT, lost 6,200 people. MS, HI, NJ, AK and VT each lost less than 5,000 residents.

The south saw the greatest population growth from 2018 to 2019, increasing 0.8% due to natural increase and people moving from others parts of the country. The north-east had a population decrease for the first time this decade, declining 0.1% due primarily to people moving away.

The new population figures also provide a look at the states that may gain or lose congressional seats from next year’s apportionment process following the 2020 Census; 435 US House seats are decided among the 50 states based on population.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
US Has Slowest Population Growth Rate In A Century As Births Decline (Original Post) appalachiablue Dec 2019 OP
The book Empty Planet PoindexterOglethorpe Dec 2019 #1
And this is not a bad thing for the planet. n/t OnlinePoker Dec 2019 #2
Amen to that. Nt NutmegYankee Dec 2019 #3
But bad for social programs killaphill Dec 2019 #11
but that bulge of older people will pass in a couple of decades or so. Kaleva Dec 2019 #21
Good News! Magoo48 Dec 2019 #15
Can't happen soon enough Boomer Dec 2019 #4
Just read that jeffreyi Dec 2019 #19
Good. progressoid Dec 2019 #5
I'd be fine with the world population eventually going down to under a billion people. Sloumeau Dec 2019 #6
Something very terrible will have to happen for that to become reality oldsoftie Dec 2019 #8
Good! BigmanPigman Dec 2019 #7
Fewer people.. Maxheader Dec 2019 #9
I've always said you don't need to worry about the planet in the long run jgmiller Dec 2019 #10
It is an act of kindness to not bring a baby into our burning world. Politicub Dec 2019 #12
Better believe young people think about it. mahina Dec 2019 #14
This is actually good news. jcmaine72 Dec 2019 #13
Is It Though? jayfish Dec 2019 #16
Probably because they cannot afford to have children. KYBlue Dec 2019 #17
I can no longer afford a pet, let alone a child. TheFourthMind Dec 2019 #20
We need immigrants. swag Dec 2019 #18

PoindexterOglethorpe

(25,839 posts)
1. The book Empty Planet
Mon Dec 30, 2019, 05:46 PM
Dec 2019

by Darrell Bricker and John Ibbetson is eye-opening. Population declines are happening in a lot of places around the world. Currently the loss is invisible because of things like immigration. But in the long run, the world population will start to decline, and probably sooner than experts currently think.

 

killaphill

(212 posts)
11. But bad for social programs
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 12:08 AM
Dec 2019

With a declining population, there aren't enough younger taxpayers to fund benefits for an increasingly older population. So the only options are to significantly raise social security taxes, cut benefits, or raise the retirement age. Its just basic math.

jeffreyi

(1,938 posts)
19. Just read that
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 11:31 AM
Dec 2019

A thought provoking read. According to the authors, who are Canadian, the populations in the "developed" societies are aging fast, and they should encourage immigration to augment the younger component. This in order to maintain economic stability. The authors are really focussed on human societies and economics, the natural world not so much.

Sloumeau

(2,657 posts)
6. I'd be fine with the world population eventually going down to under a billion people.
Mon Dec 30, 2019, 07:18 PM
Dec 2019

The fewer the people, the more the earth can heal.

jgmiller

(391 posts)
10. I've always said you don't need to worry about the planet in the long run
Mon Dec 30, 2019, 08:01 PM
Dec 2019

Earth will take care of itself, it has been doing that for eons, it's us humans that care about the planet that you have to worry about. The earth is an intergrated system that we are only just beginning to understand, we're polluting the planet and causing climate change but the planet will correct for that in many ways and one of them will be by reducing the human population. It won't be fun for us but over tens or hundreds of thousands of years things will work out.

Politicub

(12,165 posts)
12. It is an act of kindness to not bring a baby into our burning world.
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 12:58 AM
Dec 2019

I don’t think many people consider that their kids will be subjected to global warming and a capitalist system that is close to its breaking point.

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
13. This is actually good news.
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 01:13 AM
Dec 2019

It's one of the few areas in which we are still setting a positive example for the rest of the world to follow.

KYBlue

(26 posts)
17. Probably because they cannot afford to have children.
Tue Dec 31, 2019, 11:10 AM
Dec 2019

I know many young people that have so much medical and student loan debt that they can't even think about having children.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»US Has Slowest Population...