Linda McMahon (R) Proposed Social Security "Sunset" At Tea Party Forum
Source: Huffington Post
NEW YORK -- In little-noticed remarks at a Tea Party town hall meeting earlier this year, Republican Connecticut Senate candidate Linda McMahon proposed introducing a "sunset provision" into the Social Security Act.
McMahon, the former CEO of World Wrestling Entertainment, has consistently dodged questions about cutting government entitlement programs in her two Senate runs.
Speaking before a group of Tea Party supporters in Waterford, Conn. on April 20, however, McMahon said she would consider making major changes to Social Security, from raising the retirement age to means-testing benefits. She also proposed introducing a "sunset provision" -- the legislative term for putting an expiration date on a law unless it is renewed.
It's unclear what McMahon meant when she spoke about a "sunset provision" for Social Security, and her campaign did not directly address the word in a statement. McMahon's spokesman defended the candidate's record on entitlement programs and attacked her opponent, Chris Murphy.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/26/linda-mcmahon-social-security-tea-party_n_1917626.html
This is just a reminder that its not just Romney and Ryan who are trying to abolish Medicare and Social Security, then distancing themselves from comments made to their base. Here is Connecticut Republican candidate Linda McMahon.
speedoo
(11,229 posts)Total rethug 1% hack.
Cha
(297,154 posts)into the sunset.
David__77
(23,370 posts)I suppose it is. She can do that forever I suppose. She could be the next Christine O'Donnell.
Tigress DEM
(7,887 posts)cyclezealot
(4,802 posts)This should make his campaign lots easier..
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)Fearless
(18,421 posts)Asshole.
SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)progree
(10,901 posts)of people. I just hope one of them doesn't get near the nuclear red button.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Because if they wanted to win they would not say such stupid things.
Cosmocat
(14,563 posts)and can throw 10s of millions into her campaigns and not feel it, but 10s of millions is 10s of millions
She WANTS to win.
They just actually believe this shiite.
Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)I mean, really. I hope she at least rinsed off this "idea" before presenting it.
cemaphonic
(4,138 posts)Why bother with Social Security when you are so careless with the health of your employees that half of them don't even make it to their mid-60s (and you've burned all the bridges with the ones that do, so screw them).
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Randians running at the top of the GOP ticket for the highest office in the USA. There is backing for what she says, which is what the Paulbots wanted. Libertarians of all parties want Social Security gone. If you can't pay for all necessities, please hurry up and die.
She is saying what some of both sides of the political aisle want, because they want Obama, the Democrats and the government to fail. They fantasize it will create a revolution from the left to save the planet. But they just will loose more Teahadist hell than staying home in 2010 did.
PossumSqueezins
(184 posts)They need to be encouraged to share the view. They need to embrace it and talk about it openly. LET'S END A GOVERNMENT PROGRAM NOT PAID FOR BY THE GOVERNMENT AND COSTS THE GOVERNMENT NOTHING SO SENIORS CAN LIVE IN CARDBOARD BOXES AND EAT CAT FOOD.
EMBRACE IT REPUBLICANS. TELL AMERICANS HOW YOU REALLY FUCKING FEEL.
area51
(11,906 posts)whether it's by ending Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security.
I'm not being hyperbolic when I call them the nazi party. They're all about extermination.
Justice
(7,185 posts)pansypoo53219
(20,972 posts)Suji to Seoul
(2,035 posts)And that's the bottom line, because that asshole tea-bagging multi-millionaire said so.
Javaman
(62,517 posts)"LET'S GET READY FOR STUUUUUUUUPID!!!"
Good one.
Liberal_Stalwart71
(20,450 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)The Greedy Obstructive Parasite party is all the same.
CanonRay
(14,101 posts)Goodnight Linda, go home.
plethoro
(594 posts)ddddddddddddd
highplainsdem
(48,968 posts)joanbarnes
(1,722 posts)benld74
(9,904 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,624 posts)I've noticed lately that the Dems have been using that tactic.
Instead of trying to squelch Republicans from reaching out, we simply amplify their voices when they say something that hurts the majority of Americans. Republicans have had it both ways for too long, talking from either side of their mouths depending on who's listening.
With the Teabaggers forcing candidates to announce unpopular positions there have been plenty of opportunities to do so.
onethatcares
(16,166 posts)it makes the would be voterfor sit up and say "HUH????" It's not like all of us don't have a friend, relative
aquaintance that hasn't retired or somehow been able to use the program of Social Security which in my
opinion is the most successful program ever created by the government.
Keep the megaphone going.