2 cats in NY become first US pets to test positive for virus
Source: AP
Two pet cats in New York state have tested positive for the coronavirus, marking the first confirmed cases in companion animals in the United States, federal officials said Wednesday.
The cats, which had mild respiratory illnesses and are expected to recover, are thought to have contracted the virus from people in their households or neighborhoods, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said.
The finding, which comes after positive tests in some tigers and lions at the Bronx Zoo, adds to a small number of confirmed cases of the virus in animals worldwide. U.S. authorities say that while it appears some animals can get the virus from people, there's no indication the animals are transmitting it to human beings.
"We don't want people to panic. We don't want people to be afraid of pets" or to rush to test them en masse, said Dr. Casey Barton Behravesh, a CDC official who works on human-animal health connections. "There's no evidence that pets are playing a role in spreading this disease to people." Still, the CDC is recommending that people prevent their pets from interacting with people or animals outside their homes -- by keeping cats indoors and dogs out of dog parks, for instance.
Read more: https://apnews.com/37328ab8db093b8346e26e1840b48af8?utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=SocialFlow&utm_medium=APEastRegion
So that people do not become upset about animals being tested when humans do not have enough tests, here is a snip from later in the article:
Barton Behravesh said the animal tests are done at veterinary labs and use different chemicals than human tests, which have been in short supply during the crisis.
applegrove
(118,622 posts)angel823
(409 posts)Neither my daughter or I have had any symptoms.
Angel in Texasperated
Raine
(30,540 posts)I'm fine so I think (hope) he just has a cold.
applegrove
(118,622 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,849 posts)why would testing a pet take precedence over testing a human, given the limited tests available?
Mrs. Overall
(6,839 posts)Barton Behravesh said the animal tests are done at veterinary labs and use different chemicals than human tests, which have been in short supply during the crisis.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,849 posts)bamagal62
(3,256 posts)While I was sick, my cat was coughing, sneezing, and sleeping more than normal for a day or so. I was deciding about the vet when it stopped.
Makes me wonder.
OhZone
(3,212 posts)I swear I caught a cold from my cat when I was a little girl.
Also, maybe this cat is mad cause you gave him corvid!
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)OhZone
(3,212 posts)IronLionZion
(45,432 posts)Good that they don't believe people can catch it from pets. But still, it's disappointing for pets because they could catch it easily from licking whatever gets on their fur.
The virus supposedly originated in wildlife so it's probably worth studying how it interacts with animals to provide any clues to treatment or prevention.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)If it ever started spreading in the rat population, it would be impossible to contain. The new Bubonic Plague
Kashkakat v.2.0
(1,752 posts)onetexan
(13,036 posts)good one