Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 04:17 AM Jan 2012

FTC expands Google antitrust probe: source

Source: Reuters

(Reuters) - U.S. regulators looking at whether Google manipulates its search results to favor its own products have expanded the probe to include Google+, the search giant's new social networking tool, a source familiar with the probe said on Friday.

Google+, which was launched in June, offers many of the capabilities available on Twitter and on Facebook.

Google announced on Tuesday new features aimed at making search results more personalized. As part of the changes, photos and posts from Google+ will increasingly appear within the search results.

A Google spokesman, however, said that the Federal Trade Commission had not asked about Google+ or indicated it was looking into the new social network as of this week.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/13/us-google-ftc-idUSTRE80C2JH20120113

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FTC expands Google antitrust probe: source (Original Post) Little Tich Jan 2012 OP
To anyone who ever worked on SEO its obvious - "Pay to Play" FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #1
I work SEO. I currently wrangle data for 421,572 websites. You might handle less. boppers Jan 2012 #2
Do you work for Google FreakinDJ Jan 2012 #3
Okay..... boppers Jan 2012 #5
Spam deleted by tjwmason (MIR Team) kristenart60 Jun 2012 #6
Google 2012 = Microsoft 1990s. And ironically, I now use Bing as my search engine. nt onehandle Jan 2012 #4
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
1. To anyone who ever worked on SEO its obvious - "Pay to Play"
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 07:43 AM
Jan 2012

You can have a great Website with 1000s of pages of content rich information, 1000s of gratuitous backlinks and page 1 results.

2 weeks before Black-Monday if your not paying - you'll drop off the search results altogether

boppers

(16,588 posts)
2. I work SEO. I currently wrangle data for 421,572 websites. You might handle less.
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:12 AM
Jan 2012

If your content is not original, unique, and valued by others, you will fall.

Most content farms that are being crashed fail those 3 basic tests:
1. Original:
If you say the same thing as another website, you are not original. Synonyms have been busted. Word Order has been busted. Reposting others content has been busted. Reposting somebody else's content, with word order changes, and synonyms? Triple busted.

2. Unique:
This one gets SEO's frazzled. If you type, or enter, or create, a non-unique term, you will fall. If you do it on lots of pages, you will fall more. If you have 30 domains with slight variations on the same content, goodbye.

3. Valued by others:
Backlinks from real sources count now. Backlinks from a link farm? NO. From a popular blog? NO. Look up "Hilltop".

It's not "Pay to Play" anymore than "Pay to be a doctor and learn Medicine" is "Pay to Play". If you don't learn information retrieval, you don't get to be any better at SEO than a person (say, a Boy Scout) learns shock treatment, and decides they're an EMT.

Have some reading:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_retrieval



 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
3. Do you work for Google
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 08:51 AM
Jan 2012

Honestly - its all I can do not to be insulting.

Your assumptions lack an explanation of 1 fact - Why did my website and 10s of 1000s of other (whom were not paying) fall off the search results

Now before you reply go back and re-read my original post and attempt to formulate an honest reply

boppers

(16,588 posts)
5. Okay.....
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 03:58 PM
Jan 2012

"Do you work for Google"

No. They pay poorly. Cool benefits, though.

"Why did my website and 10s of 1000s of other (whom were not paying) fall off the search results "

This happens every single day. Every. Single. Day.

Many folks only seem to notice when they're the ones who fall off, but it's not payola, its tuning the search results to filter out lower quality websites and pages. Which is done daily. They announce bigger changes (like, say, Panda), because more sites change ranking than usual, but the churn is constant.

It will feel massive to you if you have a small business, and go from a #1 SERP to # 15, but from a perspective of hundreds of thousands of sites, one change like that is only a blip.

"Now before you reply go back and re-read my original post and attempt to formulate an honest reply "

Okay:
"You can have a great Website with 1000s of pages of content rich information, 1000s of gratuitous backlinks and page 1 results. 2 weeks before Black-Monday if your not paying - you'll drop off the search results altogether"

Well, for one thing, 1000 pages of original content is nothing.

What's the site(s)? I can give it a gander, or you *can* post to google's forums, and they can tell you why you're not ranking well.... but like I said, and to reiterate: "Content-rich" doesn't mean anything, if it's not quality content. Word salad is useless, as is paraphrasing, as is mindless repetition. Backlinks don't count for anything if they're from crappy, or spammy, sites.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»FTC expands Google antitr...