Netflix apologizes after thousands call to remove film that 'sexualizes' young girls
Source: yahoo
Netflix issued an apology Thursday after thousands signed a petition demanding the immediate removal of the controversial French film "Cuties" from the streaming platform.
The movie, about an 11-year-old who rebels against her family and joins a "free-spirited dance crew," is accused in the online campaign of sexualizing young girls "for the viewing pleasure of pedophiles." Originally titled "Mignonnes," the project premiered earlier this year at the Sundance Film Festival, where it won a jury award for directing.
On social media, people are calling Netflix's poster for the movie which pictures its four preteen stars posing in costumes baring their legs and midriffs "disgusting," "upsetting" and "sick." Netflix has apologized for its promotional materials but there are no plans to scrap the film, which is set to debut globally on Sept. 9.
"We're deeply sorry for the inappropriate artwork that we used for Mignonnes/Cuties," Netflix said in a statement Thursday morning. "It was not OK, nor was it representative of this French film which won an award at Sundance. Weve now updated the pictures and description.
Read more: https://news.yahoo.com/netflix-apologizes-thousands-call-remove-175438828.html
WTF were they thinking? Holy fuck, who let these pedos into Netflix?!
Roy Rolling
(6,911 posts)Exactly what does that mean? Besides the stupidity of it, the only image they should display is the pile of cash they paid for this film.
Then people will understand their mealy-mouthed response.
Netflix, as well as the morality police, are poor arbiters of morality when their decisions are based on personal enrichment.
denem
(11,045 posts)The reviews suggest "cuties" is a critique of the sexualization of children. I wont be watching it. But I need more than a twitter storm to condemn a work that has won multiple awards.
irisblue
(32,968 posts)RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)But movies from 20, 30, 40 years ago and more are always being scrutinized as no longer "socially acceptable" because they address uncomfortable themes and realities.
louzke9
(296 posts)Reminds me of the time Proctor & Gamble had to abandon a symbol they had adopted for over a century that was found on packaging on their products. A little gold circle depicting a quarter man in the moon face with a few stars. Hysteria and threats of boycotts forced P&G to drop the symbol because some claimed P&G was endorsing "Witchcraft"! The "objectionable" photo was possibly meant as a negative critique of how women and girls are objectified as sexual props to sell products, etc. and not MEANT to ENDORSE or suggest the filmmakers support pedophilia.
louzke9
(296 posts)The sleazy side of society, they have to go to those places where people feel uncomfortable/don't want to see reality. How can you make a film that exposes how young girls at earlier years are enticed into becoming sexual beings? They wear tight short skirts, bare mid-drifts, ass clinging shorts, etc. The sexier, the better! This has been happening for decades now. All to sell products and make money. The filmmaker has to show this in order to make their point. People don't want to see this harsh side of society.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Taxi Driver was a STORY in which one of the characters was an underage prostitute..."Cuties" is using a very different storyline, not to mention promotion style.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)That film could not be made today (fortunately). I am about Brooke Shield's age and saw the movie about the time it came out.
Another that came up for discussion was Lolita (which I haven't seen).
Taxi Driver does not glorify child prostitution, but it probably could not be made today (the same could be said for The Exorcist).
Polybius
(15,385 posts)Lots of underage nudity.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Still being 15 should mean nudity is off the table. Also thematically the relationship was non-exploitative as a coming of age movie.
Pretty Baby, when she was 12-13, showing being a child prostitute with significant nudity and in a highly exploitative situation is entirely different.
ananda
(28,858 posts)Now I definitely won't be returning.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)BritBox $6.99/ month via Roku or Amazon Prime.
AcornTV $4.99 / month via Roku or Amazon Prime.
Netflix $8.99 to $15.99 depending on package and via Roku or Amazon Prime.
Trial versions for BritBox and AcornTV length depend on how you access it Roku or Amazon Prime. Do some research.
ananda
(28,858 posts)It's very good.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)ananda
(28,858 posts)I know BritBox is good. I might subscribe
to it at some point, but I'm doing fine with
the sites I have for now.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)... consultant. I always seem to offer advice even if I no longer get paid to do so.
Enjoy your day!
ananda
(28,858 posts).. a good while ago.
It was just an overall lack of quality and the actual quality
was both hard to find or few and far between.
I switched to Hulu for both old shows and streaming live tv,
and it's working fine. The shows are good and the live tv
is fine.
I also have Prime and Acorn.
I can't figure out how to add PBS on Amazon, but PBS shows
have deteriorated anyway so I don't miss it that much.
I just wanted to finish watching the Frankie Drake shows.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)sl8
(13,736 posts)I don't know the tweeter (?) and have not corroborated the information, but found this interesting:
Link to tweet
====================================================
On edit, Wikipedia article:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuties
Cuties (French: Mignonnes) is a 2020 French teen coming-of-age comedy-drama film written and directed by Maïmouna Doucouré on her feature film directorial debut.[1] The film stars Fathia Youssouf, Médina El Aidi-Azouni and Maïmouna Gueye in the lead roles. The film is about a traditional Senegalese Muslim girl who is caught and torn between two contrasting sides, traditional values and internet culture, while also speaking about hyper-sexualization of pre-adolescent girls.[2][3] The film was premiered in the World Cinema Dramatic Competition sector of 2020 Sundance Film Festival on 23 January 2020 and won the Directing Jury Award praising the script of the film.[4][5][6]
[...]
Marketing controversy
Prior to its release on Netflix, the film's promotional poster and trailer were criticized on social media for allegedly sexualizing 11-year-old girls.[20][21] In response, Netflix dropped the controversial poster and replaced with another poster, saying "This was not an accurate representation of the film so the image and description has been updated."[22][23] However Netflix failed to disclose the reason behind unveiling the promotional poster which depicted a sexualised image.[24] The Parents Television Council and several Change.org petitions encouraged Netflix to remove the film entirely.[20][25]
On August 20, 2020, Netflix issued an apology for a marketing poster promoting the film that was deemed inappropriate after a storm of criticism for sexualizing children. Deadline Hollywood reported that Netflix apologized in a statement to them, saying: "We're deeply sorry for the inappropriate artwork that we used for Cuties. It was not OK, nor was it representative of this French film which premiered at Sundance. We've now updated the pictures and description."[26] It was also revealed that the Netflix version of the film poster in the United States was markedly different from the poster of the original French version, with the latter portraying the 11 year old children walking down a road holding shopping bags with confetti in the background.[27]
The film's promotion in the United States has sparked criticism for sexualizing children and promoting child pornography.[28][29] It has also drawn criticism for promoting Western stereotypes about Muslims.[30] Several Change.org petitions demanding Netflix to remove the film accumulated hundreds of thousands of signatures between them.[29]
[...]
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)I'm assuming that the image in the posted tweet is from the film. The text on the right says something about her 'exploring her femininity'. At age 11.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/113913181
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)Never mind, I don't want to know!
Nitram
(22,791 posts)was made by a woman with the express purpose of exposing and criticizing the sexual exploitation and sexualization of young girls. On the other hand, it appears Netflix tried to market the film by appealing to the prurient interests of certain segments of the audience, accomplishing the exact opposite of what was intended by the film maker.
HotTeaBag
(1,206 posts)and I was always really put off by the costumes that the girls (ages 3 through 18) were wearing...especially the roughly 5-9 year olds - very inappropriate as far as I was concerned.
What REALLY bothered me was the reaction of the audience - they seemed to love their daughters in these outfits and I could never understand why, I always thought the girls were waaaay to sexualized - they're just little kids.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)Like in this movie-prank:
Withywindle
(9,988 posts)They really did that director dirty with that campaign.
It's really ABOUT the sexualization of children and the things they do to "fit in", especially in a context of race - the filmmaker Maïmouna Doucouré is a Black woman, and the story is based on her experiences as a refugee. It's NOT meant to titillate. That marketing campaign might have ruined her career.
It premiered at Sundance, and Doucouré won an award for it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuties
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)The most famous of course JonBenét Ramsey. 1996
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_JonBen%C3%A9t_Ramsey