Sheriff: Ban On Open Carrying At Polls Not Enforceable
Source: WHMI News
She just threw gas on an ember.
Sheriff Murphy: Ban On Open Carrying At Polls Not Enforceable
By Jessica Mathews, news@whmi.com
Howell, Michigan. Livingston County Sheriff Mike Murphy maintains a recent ban issued on the open carrying of firearms at voting locations is unenforceable.
Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson issued direction Friday to local election clerks statewide clarifying that the open carry of firearms on Election Day in polling places, clerks offices, and absent voter counting boards is prohibited on Election Day, November 3rd. Some elections officials and voter rights experts nationwide are concerned about violence at the polls. Benson said prohibiting the open-carry of firearms in areas where citizens cast their ballots is necessary to ensure every voter is protected. A press release states Attorney General Dana Nessel and Michigan State Police Director Col. Joe Gasper have joined with Secretary Benson in preparations to ensure Michigan voters are safe and secure when voting by informing local law enforcement agencies and ensuring that the ban on openly carried firearms is enforced statewide.
However, Sheriff Murphy maintains there is no enforcement to take because nothing is actually against the law calling it a ludicrous statement because theres no teeth behind it. Murphy said there is no law prohibiting open carry so therefore because theres the absence of law, it makes it legal. He noted that businesses still have the ability to prohibit people from open carrying because its private property but on Election Day, polling locations are considered open to the public. Murphy added that in Livingston County, you can only vote in polls where you live so he thinks the potential for outside agitators is slim to none. He said if there are going to be some people causing agitation; theyll probably do it in their own backyard where they have a legitimate right to be so he doesnt particularly see it as being a problem on Election Day.
Murphy said hes a little disappointed that Benson came out with this two weeks before the election, adding there was no consultation with any local law enforcement thats he aware of just the Attorney General and Michigan State Police. Murphy stressed that nobody wants anything other than a safe and secure voting day but told WHMI that by Benson issuing a ban on open carrying when she has no legal authority to do so, he thinks it will just result in pushback. Murphy believes the order will just cause more issues than it was trying to solve - saying hell give Benson the benefit of the doubt that she was trying to quash problems or make it better but really, she just threw gas on an ember. Murphy says its essentially being portrayed as an order that people cant open carry within 100 feet of a polling location but he maintains theres no legal basis for that. He said just because the Secretary of State is in charge of elections, doesnt give her the authority to arbitrarily say something two weeks before the election and make it law
Read more: https://www.whmi.com/news/article/sheriff-mike-murphy-benson-election-open-carry
Now the Governor, AG and Sec of State and State Police appears to be at odds with a local Sheriff.
Different Michigan Sheriff from earlier in the week.
We live in crazy times.
DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)to carry guns on planes etc.
Boogiemack
(1,406 posts)LizBeth
(9,952 posts)escort us to vote to make sure we are safe. Surely if they have a right to have a gun, I have a right to feel safe while voting.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Probable terrorist attack.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)FBaggins
(26,727 posts)In that county... it's the sheriff.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)They are pretty good here. Nice ultra liberal area of MI.
I expect my township to go 80-85 pct Biden/Harris.
msongs
(67,381 posts)Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... open-carry in there now?
Or do the police make all the rules up there now?
FrankTC
(210 posts)Every time I enter a Michigan courthouse I have to go through a metal detector or get wanded. Maybe there's legislation that bans weapons in courthouses, but for whatever reason, there are no guns allowed in there. Likewise, given the preening of the militia morons and the boogaloo jackasses, it makes sense that there also be no guns in polling places. The Secretary of State's ban makes perfect sense. And no, it's not about taking away anybody's guns. It's about commonsense regulation for the public good.
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,919 posts)Concealed guns are banned through an Administrative Order by the Michigan Supreme Court. Courts were not listed in the gun free zones for concealed carry(Section 28.425o). They were listed in the original set of gun free zones(Section 750.234d), but that law exempts people with CPL's.
EarlG
(21,941 posts)When Dodge City residents organized their municipal government, do you know what the very first law they passed was? A gun control law. They declared that "any person or persons found carrying concealed weapons in the city of Dodge or violating the laws of the State shall be dealt with according to law." Many frontier towns, including Tombstone, Arizona--the site of the infamous "Shootout at the OK Corral"--also barred the carrying of guns openly.
https://skeptics.stackexchange.com/questions/21907/were-firearms-prohibited-in-dodge-city-kansas-in-the-1870s
They had better gun control in the 1870's Wild West than we do now.
reACTIONary
(5,770 posts)... the shoot out at the OK corral was precipitated by a violation of the gun restrictions and an attempt to enforce them.
groundloop
(11,517 posts)Other than to put on a show and intimidate people I can think of nothing.
hadEnuf
(2,184 posts)trying to interfere with that right to vote.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I assumed that was the case, but I looked it up to verify it.
The elected sheriffs can be among the most stupid and arrogant.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)This sheriff needs to go!
Who the fuck does he think he is?
No wonder the decision makers did not consult with him! Fking idiot!
AllaN01Bear
(18,110 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)James48
(4,429 posts)Or - We need Jimmy Carter up here overseeing our Michigan vote.
relayerbob
(6,543 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 17, 2020, 12:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)I really wish everyone would stop electing sheriffs in this country. They're among the worst.
John Oliver covered elected sheriffs a few months ago:
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Deuxcents
(16,156 posts)We cannot wear political buttons, t shirts with political phrases or carry signs w/in 200 feet of the polling stations. They never specified we cant be armed..a loophole?!
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,919 posts)There are zero laws regarding open carry specifically. Nothing that says you cannot open carry, nor any law that specifically states that you can. We have laws concerning concealed carry, and we have laws concerning the carrying and possession of firearms in certain areas. But there is nothing pertaining specifically to open carry. Because of this, open carry, by default, is legal here. Concealed carry is legal at polling places unless its at a school or church. Due to a loophole in how the 2 gun free zone laws are worded, open carry is legal in some gun free zones, like schools and churches, if the open carrier has a CPL. Pretty certain this ban will be challenged and I honestly don't have high hopes that a court here would uphold it. Michigan courts have sided with open carriers in the past.
COLGATE4
(14,732 posts)Citizen nonsense that "the Sheriff is the only legitimate law enforcement official".
Lars39
(26,108 posts)Initech
(100,054 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,141 posts)PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)it should be okay for me to take out my concealed gun and shoot that person?
Well, I don't actually own a gun, but you get the idea.
onetexan
(13,033 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)If the person you shot was simply carrying and not overtly threatening you then a murder charge is more likely.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)I see someone openly carrying as a grave threat. They are advertising their willingness to engage in gun violence. That is greatly fear inducing.
And I think of all the white people who have shot and killed unarmed black men. Who exactly should I fear the most?
hack89
(39,171 posts)You have to show that your life was in imminent danger. This is established case law. Has been for a very long time. Generalized fear, no matter how acute, is not grounds for killing someone.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)have gotten away with murdering black men who are walking or running away from them because they were in fear of their life. From a fleeing person.
So if someone is standing in front of me carrying any kind of a gun, I will absolutely be in fear of my life.
hack89
(39,171 posts)What if the guy you kill is white?
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)I never will have one. I'm simply trying to make a point about open carry.
Plus, your question about what if the guy I were to kill is white? Which is more or less what the problem is. White men can open carry -- including a 17 year old with whatever automatic rifle he had recently -- and shoot to kill black men, frighten everyone else around them, and face zero consequences.
Personally, I'd confiscate all guns, but despite how much gun-huggers claim that's going to happen any day now, alas, it won't.
hack89
(39,171 posts)but I just wanted to make sure everyone knew that your attitude is a dangerous one that is not supported by case law.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,839 posts)who are unarmed and sometimes shooting them is apparently supported by case law. I will say I know very little about case law.
That just shows how totally fucked up this country is in terms of guns.
Other countries have exactly one mass shooting and get rid of guns. Here we shrug our shoulders, offer thoughts and prayers, have people come forward who claim it never happened, and then the next mass shooting occurs.
However, I will say that one genuine upside to the pandemic is that we haven't had a school shooting since it started.
BComplex
(8,029 posts)sheriff agrees to abide by it, even though the Sheriff is county-wide, not just city-wide, like the police.
They make rules for things like the Christmas parade, the town festival, etc, and the Sheriff AND the police are there to make sure everything is as it should be.
W T F
(1,146 posts)FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Yes... of course it's possible to ban guns in a court building.
But "you" do it by having the legislature pass such a law and have the governor sign it.
"You" can't do it by decree just because you're the Secretary of State. A governor might be able to do it by declaring an emergence
It isn't that it isn't a good idea... or that it isn't shocking that existing law didn't already have such restrictions.
orangecrush
(19,499 posts)burrowowl
(17,636 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Or is state legislature full of repuke scum?
This is same state where terrorists armed with assault rifles were in state capitol building while law makers were in session, right?
Is there not some way to force this dirtbag to do his fking job?
James48
(4,429 posts)Due to Republican gerrymandering, about 60% of Both Michigan State House And Senate seats are Republican, even though the majority of the state votes blue.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)I suspected thos, but wasn't sure.
Doreen
(11,686 posts)allowed to stay too? What a bunch of bullshit.
C Moon
(12,212 posts)This time, we can't give in to the fucking cheaters.
And when we win, they are going to do time: no more "let's move on and heal the nation."
The nation won't heal until these bastards pay for their crimesevery god damned one of them!
We need to take our country back from those who tried to Make America White Again.
onetexan
(13,033 posts)mawaaaaaaaaa & and MAHA (make America hate again): mahaaaaaaaaa
Dems should do the MASA moniker - make America SMART again
masaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sounds like the calming "wusaaaaaa" & "ommmmmm"
mdbl
(4,973 posts)I hope they use the state police.
sinkingfeeling
(51,444 posts)Who would come to remove a group of protesters who occupied the voting site in mass to stop people from voting ?
melm00se
(4,988 posts)OK, Bob shows up at a polling place packing.
The polling place is somewhere other than
- A depository financial institution (e.g., bank or
credit union)
- A church or other place of religious worship
- A court
- A theater
- A sports arena
- A day care center
- A hospital
- An establishment licensed under the Liquor Control Code
(all of these are covered by MCL 750.234d p)
or (and by extension as these are covered by MCL 28.425o)
- School or school property, except a parent or
legal guardian who is dropping off or picking up a
child and the pistol is kept in the vehicle
- Public or private day care center
- Sports arena or stadium
- A bar or tavern where sale and consumption of
liquor by the glass is the primary source of
income (does not apply to owner or employee of
the business).
- Any property or facility owned or operated by a
church, synagogue, mosque, temple, or other
place of worship, unless authorized by the
presiding official
- An entertainment facility that has a seating
capacity of 2,500 or more
- A hospital
- A dormitory or classroom of a community college,
college, or university
- A casino
What crime, exactly, and under what law (also specifically) would the open carry person be charged?
Or can the Secretary of State, Attorney General and/or State Police create a law out of thin air?
It is the last sentence above that is most concerning. Is it ok for a government official to unilaterally just up and create a new law? Think about that for second. Remove firearms from the situation and substitute something else (IE you can't wear a t-shirt and jeans in a polling place). Lawful or overreach?
The last time I checked the Michigan State Constitution, Article IV § 1, the legislative power of the State of Michigan is vested in a senate and a house of representatives.
As there is no law against it, if this progresses to a court, how do you think a judge will react? and say?
And the defendant chooses to exercise his/her right to have the charges read. What is that reading going to say? What law, enshrined in the penal code, is going to be the basis for the charges?
3825-87867
(840 posts)The First Amendment says we have freedom of speech (except in a crowded theater screaming "Fire" .
However, governments here have restricted legal protests (1st Amendment Rights?) time and again because they've been "worried" about problems. As I stated in another post, we were denied access to Bush's RNC in NYC in 2004 when Rudy set up "Free speech zones" blocks away. That was ok'ed by the courts. And isn't it funny that the protestors didn't "Arm themselves" and ignore the ruling? And none of them threatened harm or any kind of retribution or militia action for denying their right to protest.
Nobody is denying your 2nd Amendment right to carry if it's the law. But they, local and state governments, can decide WHERE you can carry if that might (in their opinion) cause problems and/or safety concerns and that precedent has been set and ruled on by courts.
Setting a Gun free zone away from polling places is no worse or evidently more illegal than setting a curfew in Portland for protestors so they can't express their right to peaceful gatherings.
It's America 2020 - we actually and truly have no rights any longer.
Kaleva
(36,291 posts)SCOTUS reversed their stand way back in 1958.
melm00se
(4,988 posts)(like at schools) is a federal law.
Again, I ask under what law would the violator be charged? It's not sufficient to say "Because the Secretary of State and/or the State Attorney General said so".
We are talking about potential criminal sanctions with no apparent law on the books.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)You don't HAVE TO arrest people for doing something that's against regulations.
If I show up at a football game ticket person and I'm packing, they would say go put your gun in the car or you're not coming inside.
They don't arrest me, even though it's illegal to bring a gun into the place.
See how that works?
Of course, I'm white.
If I wasn't, the law would probably work differently.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)...the dept of state has responsibility for the elections and voting process. I suspect the Sec/State and AG want the county sheriff to act as bouncers at the polls a la, enter with an OC firearm, get told to leave. While you can't be charged with a crime for carrying in the polling place, in many jurisdictions failure follow the direction of law enforcement is arrestable. Perhaps the DA won't be able to charge you but not leaving and securing the weapon may get you detained for a bit.
I might infer that the sheriff may want to enlarge his staff before complying with tasks he may consider closer to being the high school hall monitor than enforcing laws. Some of those entering public service have an eye toward empire building.
Kaleva
(36,291 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)... open-carry or concealed.
Not that I'm going there - I voted absentee.
Kaleva
(36,291 posts)But they can't conceal carry. One of the many quirks of Michigan gun laws.
UrbanProspector
(44 posts)Howell is a reliably red town anyway (ie KKK), smart voters (ie Dems & Indy) have probably already voted absentee there anyway. So fire away for freedumb I guess, because its all in the "constitution". Glad I live on the bluer side of the state.
bluestarone
(16,894 posts)HE chose to open it just to cause trouble!!! That's the ONLY reason!! I'm sure the locals won't be able to REMOVE this asshole!
dware
(12,335 posts)Kaleva
(36,291 posts)Marthe48
(16,927 posts)In Ohio, we aren't allowed to wear anything political within 50 ft. I imagine the (mainly) elderly poll workers would find it easier to tell someone to remove a button than to tell them to 'stand down, proud guy.' And while you could poke somebody pretty hard with the business end of a political pin, you can do worse with a loaded gun in a confrontation. If the sheriff won't do his job, we can't expect volunteers manning the polling places to step in. We should be able to expect a sheriff to do his job, and call for backup if he can't. I'm sick of gun supporters using public safety as a target for their right to have their weapons at all times.
That being said, I watched so many westerns where the town had a no gun law and anyone coming in had to check their guns with the sheriff, or they couldn't stay in town. Or if they got caught with a gun, they were relieved of their weapon and jailed. Wouldn't that be a pleasant fulfillment of armed phantasy?
turbinetree
(24,688 posts)SunSeeker
(51,546 posts)Both of these Sheriffs are right wing idiots, who have forgotten the meaning of "to protect and to serve."
old guy
(3,283 posts)They are not elected because they will enforce all the laws equally, they are elected because they are fun to have a drink with and can be counted on to let things slide for their friends and neighbors and relatives. The argument used is not enough manpower and not enough money. IMO, having had several meetings with them over issues of enforcement, it is also a matter of just maintaining the status quo. Don't rock the boat!
MichMan
(11,900 posts)I have never met any of them over a drink nor have they ever let anything slide for my friends, neighbors and relatives.
Sometimes the ones I vote for end up winning and sometimes they don't
LiberalFighter
(50,828 posts)Polling places are not open to the public as he interprets. They are only open to registered voters with intent to vote. Once they have voted they can't go back in.
Doubt police can be inside the polling locations without cause either.
Candidates can't go into the polls unless they are voting there.
MichMan
(11,900 posts)The comments came after Nessel was asked about whether she could rely on elected local sheriffs to enforce voter intimidation and security laws given Barry County Sheriff Dar Leaf's relationship with militia groups and other sheriffs' lack of support for previous executive orders.
"If you have a county sheriff that seems to be sympathetic to any of these organizations and we think they're not going to enforce the laws, then we'll get somebody else who will, the Michigan State Police," Nessel said.
"Every place in the state of Michigan, there will be law enforcement that believe that voters need to be protected."
[link:https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/politics/2020/10/18/dana-nessel-michigan-state-police-enforce-voting-laws-election-day/3706699001/|
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,336 posts)6 car lengths away from the polls, no problem, hold your guns in the air, wave them around, probably discourage a lot of voters.