Derek Chauvin files motion for new trial in George Floyd case, alleging jury misconduct
Source: NBC News
Chauvins attorney, Eric Nelson, filed the request alleging that the former officer's ability to have a fair trial was affected by pretrial publicity.
Former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin filed an appeal for a new trial Tuesday after being convicted last month of murdering George Floyd.
Chauvins attorney, Eric Nelson, filed the request alleging that Chauvin's ability to have a fair trial was affected by pretrial publicity. The motion alleges that the court abused its discretion by denying the requests for a change in venue and a new trial.
Since the court failed to sequester the jury or "admonish them to avoid all media," they were not only subjected to prejudicial publicity but also "jury intimidation or potential fear of retribution," Nelson's filing said.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/derek-chauvin-files-motion-new-trial-george-floyd-case-alleging-n1266341
This is a developing story; check back for updates.
Ocelot II
(115,669 posts)Abuse of discretion is a pretty tough standard of review for an appeal, which he's trying to set up.
Siwsan
(26,259 posts)If they were so worried about jury contamination/intimidation, perhaps they should have opted for a directed verdict.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Nothing, NOTHING could have predjudiced those 9 minutes.
Evidence was Chauvin's own appalling behavior.
Rhiannon12866
(205,161 posts)And the witnesses were devastating.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)There are two elements to this that locked in Chauvin's guilt.
1) it is so clearly excessive and deadly that it is painful for moral people to watch, its traumatizing because empathetic humans do not like to watch snuff films.
2) Chauvin's sneering veneer in the still photos from his time murdering George Floyd are more than enough ALONE to know that his guilt was not really in dispute.
LittleGirl
(8,282 posts)with your two points. Those two points are what did him in.
Nobody likes to watch someone take their last breath with that smug faced piece of shit kneeling on his neck!
There was no remorse.
Go to Jail Chauvin!
Rot the rest of your life there.
JohnnyRingo
(18,624 posts)To get a sympathetic white jury pool, Chauvin will try to get a change of venue to an upper class suburban location. It may not help, but his odds suddenly become better.
On second thought, he may just go for a county that voted 90+% for Donald Trump.
mucifer
(23,525 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,624 posts)..unless he gets a new trial.
onenote
(42,690 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,624 posts)Unless he gets his new trial.
Then they can go for a venue change to somewhere more friendly to that Thin Blue Line.
bluestarone
(16,900 posts)And point that out?
onenote
(42,690 posts)localroger
(3,626 posts)For example, the fact that he'd done this before would have probably come out. Also he is not a very sympathetic witness. You can tell he was coached to do his best (all the "taking notes" was meant to demonstrate interest, but he didn't sell it and he just looked more interested in the notepad than the trial). But he just can't hide his own arrogance. It's become too much of a habit for him.
ShazzieB
(16,359 posts)You're right about the arrogance being readily discernible. People like that don't know how to hide it. When you think you're better, more important, and smarter than everyone else, you don't think anyone has the intelligence to see through your facade.
His "above it all" self-estimation was abundantly apparent in the video as well. He wasn't fooling anyone on that score.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)and audio! As far as I'm concerned, the jury you're complaining about gave you exactly
what you deserve.
bdamomma
(63,836 posts)what we saw was murder.
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)Or maybe Venus, but hell, we got stuff up on Mars... could set up court there.
hee, hee..
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)See how that works out for him.
msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)See if that works for them.
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)hee hee,
Irish_Dem
(46,905 posts)The Rovers don't need all that junk they carry, they can make some room.
msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,900 posts)JohnSJ
(92,123 posts)to interview after the trial.
While I think the odds are against a new trial, this was not necessary
questionseverything
(9,647 posts)The juror maybe in trouble
JohnSJ
(92,123 posts)and preparation the prosecution did
and I am not too happy that Maxine Waters thought it necessary to make those comments before the verdict, and I am none too happy that the judge didn't sequester the jury either.
If a new trial is found, I fully expect the defense to change the venue, and move to an extremely conservative district.
That is what happened with the Rodney King trial. They moved it to Simi Valley here in California, which is a conservative stronghold politically, and I suspect the defense will do the same thing in Minnesota
Raine
(30,540 posts)stupidly put himself in the public eye.
brush
(53,764 posts)And what was the lie?
It was reported that 11 jurors wanted to convict immediately but one was undecided, which it why it took as long as it did before the undecided juror finally came around. Would that be the juror that lied?
Raine
(30,540 posts)but then a picture surfaced of him at a BLM protest after he did a TV interview last week.
MichMan
(11,907 posts)Terrible if that ends up overturning the verdict
Deminpenn
(15,278 posts)It's likey he will face questioning by the judge, though.
onenote
(42,690 posts)It was undoubtedly prepared well before the story about Mitchell broke and doesn't refer to Mitchell.
Here's a copy of the motion.
https://www.mncourts.gov/mncourtsgov/media/High-Profile-Cases/27-CR-20-12646/Notice-of-Motion-and-Motion.pdf
JohnSJ
(92,123 posts)onenote
(42,690 posts)I was pointing out that you were mistaken in linking the the decision to file the motion to the Mitchell disclosure.
JohnSJ
(92,123 posts)Rocknation
(44,575 posts)What does he think he's doing NOW???
rocktivity
azureblue
(2,146 posts)Amazing projection there. get scheduled to testify against a cop on trial and see what happens.. You get stopped, your friends get stopped and drugs planted. Your grandma's house gets invaded over a "suspicious drug activity"
Fullduplexxx
(7,854 posts)Aussie105
(5,377 posts)in broad daylight in front of witnesses, some holding cell phones cameras . . .
You are going to get 'pre trial publicity'. All over the news.
Expecting anything else is just unrealistic.
By all means have a retrial. The end result will be the same. Maybe a longer sentence?
Blue Owl
(50,347 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,143 posts)marble falls
(57,073 posts)Response to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)
Pas-de-Calais This message was self-deleted by its author.
onenote
(42,690 posts)BradAllison
(1,879 posts)And his slimy lawyer.
ailsagirl
(22,893 posts)Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)is what Chauvin's former department still does on a regular basis to minorities.