FCC's Net-Neutrality Proposal Marred by Millions of Fake Comments
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: The Wall Street Journal
Nearly 18 million fake comments were filed with the Federal Communications Commission over its proposal to scale back internet regulation, fueled by both opponents and supporters of the rule, an investigation by the New York attorney generals office found.
A report by Attorney General Letitia Jamess office highlighted companies that specialize in a little-known influence industry that generates made-up comments and often attaches the names of real people caught up in marketing ploys. The 18 million fake comments represented more than 80% of all public comments filed to the FCC on its net-neutrality proposal four years ago.
Investigators found that commenters were tricked into providing their personal information in exchange for lures that included sweepstakes entries, discounted childrens movies, a chicken-recipe cookbook and free trials for male enhancement pills. In other cases, names were reused from old campaigns and data breaches or just made up.
About 8.5 million of the fake comments to the FCC derived from a $4.2 million campaign paid for by Broadband for America, an advocacy group funded by the nations top internet providers, in an effort to dump net neutrality, the Obama-era policy on equal treatment of internet traffic. Broadband for America and a lobbyist listed on the groups tax forms didnt immediately respond to emails or phone calls.
Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/fccs-net-neutrality-proposal-marred-by-millions-of-fake-comments-11620309351
dalton99a
(81,451 posts)Fucking liars and criminals
Omaha Steve
(99,582 posts)Dupe of https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142739496
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. >No duplicates.< News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.