Supreme Court finds FHFA structure unconstitutional
Source: Housing Wire
A Supreme Court decision in Collins v. Yellen has found the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) unconstitutional, allowing for the removal of its director.
The case questioned whether the Biden administration would have the power to fire the agencys director, Mark Calabria, a Trump-appointee and vocal critic of the government-sponsored enterprises. The court found that restricting his removal was unconstitutional.
The President must be able to remove not just officers who disobey his commands but also those he finds negligent and inefficient,
those who exercise their discretion in a way that is not intelligen[t] or wis[e],
those who have different views of policy, and those who come from a competing political party who is dead set against [the Presidents] agenda, the opinion reads.
The Presidents removal power serves important purposes regardless of whether the agency in question affects ordinary Americans by directly regulating them or by taking actions that have a profound but indirect effect on their lives, Justice Samuel Alito wrote. And there can be no question that the FHFAs control over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can deeply impact the lives of millions of Americans by affecting their ability to buy and keep their homes.
Read more: https://www.housingwire.com/articles/supreme-court-finds-fhfa-structure-unconstitutional/
AllaN01Bear
(18,119 posts)MLAA
(17,267 posts)ananda
(28,856 posts)Glad to see Biden can get rid the Trumpers.
Jose Garcia
(2,592 posts)iluvtennis
(19,844 posts)the way they want.
NCjack
(10,279 posts)TNNurse
(6,926 posts)NellieStarbuck
(266 posts)sheshe2
(83,718 posts)Next up USPS
malthaussen
(17,184 posts)Although establishing the President's power to fire "those who come 'from a competing political party who [sic] is dead set against [the President's] agenda.'" sounds like a bad precedent. On the surface, it basically allows a President to fire anybody who didn't vote for him.
The scope of the decision, of course, is not so broad... but the language bothers me.
-- Mal
PSPS
(13,588 posts)There is no requirement for any "due process" when it comes to political appointees. They can be summarily fired and that's the end of it. I, like you, am surprised this was even on the supreme court's docket in the first place.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)It's interesting.
And for me, a bit overwhelming to read the opinion and all the little bits to the FHFA
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/collins-v-mnuchin/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-422_k537.pdf
I found it interesting that the original case seemed to be Collins v Mnuchin and then became Collins v. Yellin once it arrived at SCOTUS
napi21
(45,806 posts)President!" Those who are bitching bout it now is because it bit their own butt!
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,878 posts)jaxexpat
(6,815 posts)which also decided sun to rise in east. Sky color remains undecided due to 6-3 decision that "blue" is not a color. Precise direction of east still in question pending hearing encompassing compasses.
Marcuse
(7,473 posts)jmowreader
(50,552 posts)Alcohol lowers the surface tension of water, making beer wetter than water.
StSmathers
(3 posts)appmanga
(571 posts)..."A similar decision last summer found the CFPBs structure to be unconstitutional, and eliminated the Bureau directors protection from being fired by the president".
https://www.housingwire.com/articles/supreme-court-finds-fhfa-structure-unconstitutional/
summer_in_TX
(2,727 posts)Now Biden can get rid of Calabra, and I hope, anything blocking his dealing with Louis DeJoy!
questionseverything
(9,646 posts)Dejoy needs
De boot
live love laugh
(13,095 posts)Seems like a very broad brush that can and more than likely will be misused by them.