Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 11:29 AM Jun 2021

Supreme Court finds FHFA structure unconstitutional

Source: Housing Wire

A Supreme Court decision in Collins v. Yellen has found the structure of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) unconstitutional, allowing for the removal of its director.

The case questioned whether the Biden administration would have the power to fire the agency’s director, Mark Calabria, a Trump-appointee and vocal critic of the government-sponsored enterprises. The court found that restricting his removal was unconstitutional.

“The President must be able to remove not just officers who disobey his commands but also those he finds ‘negligent and inefficient,’… those who exercise their discretion in a way that is not ‘intelligen[t] or wis[e],’ … those who have ‘different views of policy,’” and “those who come ‘from a competing political party who is dead set against [the President’s] agenda,” the opinion reads.

“The President’s removal power serves important purposes regardless of whether the agency in question affects ordinary Americans by directly regulating them or by taking actions that have a profound but indirect effect on their lives,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote. “And there can be no question that the FHFA’s control over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can deeply impact the lives of millions of Americans by affecting their ability to buy and keep their homes.”

Read more: https://www.housingwire.com/articles/supreme-court-finds-fhfa-structure-unconstitutional/

24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court finds FHFA structure unconstitutional (Original Post) Algernon Moncrieff Jun 2021 OP
and we are stuck with t---- s us supreme court picks for decades . AllaN01Bear Jun 2021 #1
I understand this is a good ruling, allowing President to remove previous administration appointees. MLAA Jun 2021 #2
That's how I read it. ananda Jun 2021 #15
It will also permit future GOP Presidents to remove Democratic appointees Jose Garcia Jun 2021 #17
Yes, but it's a good thing in my opinion. Presidents should be able to be their staffs/organizations iluvtennis Jun 2021 #18
Good. Now, fix the US Postal Service -- fire NoJoy. NCjack Jun 2021 #3
+1 OneCrazyDiamond Jun 2021 #6
My first thought TNNurse Jun 2021 #10
And mine. NellieStarbuck Jun 2021 #16
Good 👍 sheshe2 Jun 2021 #4
Kind of amazing this would be a Constitutional issue. malthaussen Jun 2021 #5
Political appointees serve "at the pleasure of the president" and can be fired anytime. PSPS Jun 2021 #7
I went to SCOTUs blog. There is a whole bunch to this decision rpannier Jun 2021 #21
Absolutely! That's exactly the phrase I've always heard over the years. "At the pleasure of the napi21 Jun 2021 #22
Another Trump holdover bites the dust Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jun 2021 #8
Great news: USSC finds water to be wet in split decision...... jaxexpat Jun 2021 #9
+ AZ8theist Jun 2021 #11
The dissenting opinion of Justice Kavanaugh concluded that beer is wetter than water. Marcuse Jun 2021 #13
It actually is wetter than water jmowreader Jun 2021 #23
Good news StSmathers Jun 2021 #12
The Court is at least being consistent... appmanga Jun 2021 #14
Hooray! summer_in_TX Jun 2021 #19
K&r questionseverything Jun 2021 #20
"... those who have 'different views of policy..." live love laugh Jun 2021 #24

MLAA

(17,267 posts)
2. I understand this is a good ruling, allowing President to remove previous administration appointees.
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 11:50 AM
Jun 2021

iluvtennis

(19,844 posts)
18. Yes, but it's a good thing in my opinion. Presidents should be able to be their staffs/organizations
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 03:53 PM
Jun 2021

the way they want.

malthaussen

(17,184 posts)
5. Kind of amazing this would be a Constitutional issue.
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 12:16 PM
Jun 2021

Although establishing the President's power to fire "those who come 'from a competing political party who [sic] is dead set against [the President's] agenda.'" sounds like a bad precedent. On the surface, it basically allows a President to fire anybody who didn't vote for him.
The scope of the decision, of course, is not so broad... but the language bothers me.

-- Mal

PSPS

(13,588 posts)
7. Political appointees serve "at the pleasure of the president" and can be fired anytime.
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 12:38 PM
Jun 2021

There is no requirement for any "due process" when it comes to political appointees. They can be summarily fired and that's the end of it. I, like you, am surprised this was even on the supreme court's docket in the first place.

rpannier

(24,329 posts)
21. I went to SCOTUs blog. There is a whole bunch to this decision
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 08:57 PM
Jun 2021

It's interesting.
And for me, a bit overwhelming to read the opinion and all the little bits to the FHFA

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/collins-v-mnuchin/
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-422_k537.pdf

I found it interesting that the original case seemed to be Collins v Mnuchin and then became Collins v. Yellin once it arrived at SCOTUS

napi21

(45,806 posts)
22. Absolutely! That's exactly the phrase I've always heard over the years. "At the pleasure of the
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 10:20 PM
Jun 2021

President!" Those who are bitching bout it now is because it bit their own butt!

jaxexpat

(6,815 posts)
9. Great news: USSC finds water to be wet in split decision......
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 12:53 PM
Jun 2021

which also decided sun to rise in east. Sky color remains undecided due to 6-3 decision that "blue" is not a color. Precise direction of east still in question pending hearing encompassing compasses.

jmowreader

(50,552 posts)
23. It actually is wetter than water
Thu Jun 24, 2021, 01:46 AM
Jun 2021

Alcohol lowers the surface tension of water, making beer wetter than water.

appmanga

(571 posts)
14. The Court is at least being consistent...
Wed Jun 23, 2021, 01:26 PM
Jun 2021

..."A similar decision last summer found the CFPB’s structure to be unconstitutional, and eliminated the Bureau director’s protection from being fired by the president".

https://www.housingwire.com/articles/supreme-court-finds-fhfa-structure-unconstitutional/

live love laugh

(13,095 posts)
24. "... those who have 'different views of policy..."
Thu Jun 24, 2021, 03:54 AM
Jun 2021

Seems like a very broad brush that can and more than likely will be misused by “them”.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court finds FHFA ...