AOC blames Democrats for letting eviction moratorium expire, says Biden wasn't 'forthright'
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: USA Today
WASHINGTON U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-New York, blamed Democratic leadership for allowing the nation's eviction moratorium to expire and said the White House wasn't being "forthright" about its desire for Congress to act until it was too late.
The Democratic-controlled House adjourned Friday without extending the moratorium that was put in place to help renters amid the coronavirus pandemic. It expired Sunday, leaving progressive Democrats like Ocasio-Cortez outraged and demanding that the House return from its August recess.
Ocasio-Cortez said House Democratic leadership had an opportunity to hold a vote on extending the moratorium last week, but "there was frankly a handful of conservative Democrats in the House that threatened to get on planes rather than hold this vote.
"We have to really just call a spade a spade," she said in an interview Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union." "We cannot in good faith blame House Republicans when Democrats have the majority."
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/aoc-blames-democrats-for-letting-eviction-moratorium-expire-says-biden-wasnt-forthright/ar-AAMOyWu?li=BBnb7Kz
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Caught flar footed and looking to pass the buck
question everything
(47,434 posts)would it?
LenaBaby61
(6,972 posts)padah513
(2,496 posts)agingdem
(7,805 posts)meet with HUD officials, work like hell to change minds and get it done but shut up on tv...we've got enough screaming Gyms/Kevins/Teds/Marcos/Lindsays coming at us with their insane bullshit, we don't need you give them ammunition...
apologies to all those who are AOC fans...I'm not one of them...
LakeArenal
(28,802 posts)womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
marie999
(3,334 posts)the moratorium. Why did they let it lapse?
Autumn
(44,980 posts)To hear the "Republicans blocked it" excuse, when we have the majority is bull.
brush
(53,741 posts)As another poster mentioned, why didn't she raise this issue before the deadline approached? Was something wrong with her phone or email program? She should've been working the lines of communication long before this if this was so important to her.
She never misses a chance to publicly bash her own party.
Autumn
(44,980 posts)should have been on it It's been known for a while it was going to expire.shrug:
"Really, we only learned about this yesterday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters after Democrats tried to extend the moratorium, only to have Republicans object.
The failed vote came after Pelosi and her top two deputies huddled with House Financial Services Chair Maxine Waters on Friday evening to try to reach a solution. The leadership team even went down a list one by one, calling their caucuss remaining hold-outs a last-gasp campaign that took place as lawmakers grew more frustrated by the hour at the delay of the August recess.
Pelosi, who thanked Waters for her work on the issue, acknowledged part of the problem was the last-minute notice from White House about the need to handle legislatively.
Not really enough time to socialize it within our caucus to build... the consensus necessary, Pelosi added.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/30/eviction-battle-house-democrats-501758
lapucelle
(18,187 posts)and Nancy Pelosi put together and wanted to put to a vote?
Top Democratic leaders tried to find the votes to pass the eviction moratorium, but the bid failed Friday evening.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/07/30/eviction-battle-house-democrats-501758
TexasBushwhacker
(20,142 posts)have not distributed the aid that has been allocated to them.
maxsolomon
(33,244 posts)yes? then it was fucked.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)maybe if she spent some time in DC instead of Texas and Ohio. She would have known that. Maybe she know that NY Gov. has signed an extension until August 21st.
Perhaps Congress should have been finding out why sate were doing whatever with the money.
[link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2021/07/30/evictions-moratorium-expire-rental-assistance/|]
12 percent was spent. There was 46 billion just sitting around. Ask yourself who wrote the bill?
Legislation (S.6362-A/A.7175-A) Extends the Moratorium on COVID-related Residential and Commercial Evictions and Foreclosure Proceedings for Those Filing a Hardship Declaration Until August 31, 2021
Adds to New York State's Efforts to Protect Tenants and Homeowners Undergoing Economic Hardship Due to COVID-19
[link:https://www.governor.ny.gov/news/governor-cuomo-signs-extension-covid-19-emergency-eviction-and-foreclosure-prevention-act-2020|]
DallasNE
(7,402 posts)She is right that extending it was in the hands of the Democratic majority in the House. But Biden was right in letting it expire. A lot of smaller landlords are at risk of losing their rental business to the bank due to their income stream drying up. Standing in the way is the anti-vaxxers that keep the pandemic fueled. AOC should be targeting the anti-vaxxers for her scorn.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
quaint
(2,551 posts)Aides to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Sherrod Brown, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, said the two are working on legislation to extend the moratorium. Democrats will try to pass a bill as soon as possible and are urging Republicans not to block it.
In the House, a bill was introduced Thursday to extended the moratorium until the end of the year. But the prospect of a legislative solution remained unclear.
The court mustered a bare 5-4 majority last month, to allow the eviction ban to continue through the end of July. One of those in the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, made clear he would block any additional extensions unless there was clear and specific congressional authorization.
aocommunalpunch
(4,232 posts)if the executive did it anyway and made the conversation about how uninvestigated Kavanaugh wants to kick people out on the street? I guess we'll never know.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)So, first the kids cant go to school and now they will have no home. How can Americans do this to our kids? Cori said she once lived in her car with a baby and a toddler. She was always afraid social services would find out and take her kids.
Link to tweet
?s=21
FloridaBlues
(4,004 posts)Spread the blame evenly AOC.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)Link to tweet
?s=21
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)Now thousands of babies and kids will probably join the rest of the homeless living in cars and tents.
Bettie
(16,071 posts)who is also a Democrat, but apparently is on a list of those who it is OK to bash anytime they want to!
So, a win for a certain group who live for that.
padah513
(2,496 posts)She's bashing a Democratic president! She always bashes Democratic party members. What the heck is up with that?
Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)Just because the SCOTUS ruled a certain way (5-4 decision no less) does not take away the President's practical ability to act differently. Every President has been at odds with the SCOTUS. The President is supposed to act in a way he or she believes is Constitutional. So if he thinks an executive order extending the CDC moratorium is Constitutional, then he should order it. Then defend his order in court. It the SCOTUS rejects that opinion, then so be it.
The Biden Admin should have just said the SCOTUS ruled one way, and Biden agrees with it that's why he is not extending the moratorium by executive order.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,741 posts)What you just said doesn't make a lick of sense.
George II
(67,782 posts)....President.
I suspect President Biden knows what he can and can't do.
Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)That argument makes perfect sense to me.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,741 posts)Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)...then the executive. Simply because the SCOTUS says something does not automatically mean the President must obey if the President has a sincere disagreement. If the President had to obey the SCOTUS absolutely, then that would mean the SCOTUS is superior to the Executive, which means there would be no balance.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,741 posts)Always has since Marbury vs Madison.
Your logic is something Trump would follow.
Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)Since the President did not extend the moratorium by executive order, then logical conclusion is he does not believe it would be Constitutional to do so. So just come and say it instead of blaming the SCOTUS as if the Judicial branch is superior to the Executive. It is not.
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Reply #38)
NurseJackie This message was self-deleted by its author.
George II
(67,782 posts)Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....free Black Americans to get passports (an end run around the decision) and "he encouraged and signed legislation in 1862 banning slavery in all western territories" - NOT defying the Supreme Court, but getting legislation passed by Congress. This's precisely what today's Supreme Court said in their decision - the moratorium could not be extended without Congress acting.
Plus, those occurred in the midst of the Civil War. It's questionable whether or not, if there was a dispute, Lincoln could have considered those as "war powers".
Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)...is not Superior to the Executive. Which means Lincoln disagreed with the SCOTUS and acted in a manner that he Lincoln believed was Constitutional.
I am not saying that Biden was required to extend the moratorium by EO. If he sincerely believes that the SCOTUS ruling was correct, then he is well within his right to refuse sot extend it.
But that is not what the Admin is putting out there. Rather the admin is putting out the message that the SCOTUS ruled the moratorium unconstitutional, so Biden couldn't do anything about it. That is a cop out because the SCOTUS is not superior to the Executive.
George II
(67,782 posts)...as pointed out, neither openly defied the Supreme Court.
1. He had passports issued to Blacks, with the implication that they were citizens but not explicitly saying they were.
2. He encouraged legislation, exactly what the 2021 Supreme court said would be a remedy for extending the moratorium.
That was in 1862, in the middle of the Civil War, and only 73 years after the creation of the Constitution. We now have 159 more years' worth of "precedent", and Constitutional law is a lot more developed than it was back then.
Finally, perhaps President Biden doesn't believe an EO extending the moratorium is Constitutional. Why not take a meeting with him and find out?
Progressive Lawyer
(617 posts)Finally, perhaps President Biden doesn't believe an EO extending the moratorium is Constitutional. Why not take a meeting with him and find out?
Well if the Biden is of that position, then his own admin teams is saying something else. I don't remember any spokesperson saying that Biden agreed with the SOCTUS ruling on the moratorium. Maybe I missed it?
And why would I need to take a meeting with Biden just to find out his position on one of the most hotly debated topics of the past year? I expect his Admin to put out his opinion, just like everyone else.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,741 posts)Other than that I can't think of any.
John Marshall has made his decision
now let him enforce it.
Those are the famous words uttered by President Andrew Jackson in relation to U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshalls 1832 decision in Worcester v. Georgia to strike down a Georgia law that imposed regulations on the comings and goings of white people in Native American land.
https://sustainatlanta.com/2015/04/02/remembering-the-time-andrew-jackson-decided-to-ignore-the-supreme-court-in-the-name-of-georgias-right-to-cherokee-land/
ColinC
(8,278 posts)...not because he didn't have the power to singlehandedly extend it.
George II
(67,782 posts)...is finding fault with Biden.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 1, 2021, 03:58 PM - Edit history (1)
https://news.yahoo.com/aoc-vows-progressives-tank-bipartisan-142012738.htmlAOC vows progressives will 'tank' the bipartisan infrastructure bill if a reconciliation bill including more care-economy and climate change measures isn't passed in tandem
Business Insider
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/business-insider/
ColinC
(8,278 posts)Assuming she isn't lying, they have been trying to communicate with him well before this deadline has been approaching and right after the SCOTUS rulings. That being said, congress could have passed something a long time ago, which is also part of AOCs statement -something she doesn't single handedly have the power to do.
womanofthehills
(8,661 posts)ColinC
(8,278 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)She's part of that majority, Biden isn't. What has she done to extend the moratorium except show up at the Capitol last night at the moment the moratorium expired?
Budi
(15,325 posts)Face it. She's got one of the lowest records of accomplishing anything in her 2 years.
Where's that stat referring to her record?
Something like #204 on the list of House members?
If she walked as she talked she'd have rallied the House in a preemptive measure & to send the bill to President Biden's desk.
But nope!
Nadda...
Now she speaks up!! 🙄
Gtfouttahere.
George II
(67,782 posts)216 93.90% Jamaal Bowman D NY-16
217 91.20% Ron Kind D WI-3
217 91.20% Ilhan Omar D MN-5
217 91.20% Ayanna Pressley D MA-7
220 90.60% Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez D NY-14
220 90.60% Rashida Tlaib D MI-13
222 87.90% Cori Bush D MO-1
223 80.00% Jared Golden D ME-2
203 of the 223 have voted with Biden 100% of the time.
Budi
(15,325 posts)But as we clearly see by these rating #s.
Why would we have expected the talker-not-walkers to have done the job they now blame the President for.
His job was to Sign Their Bill. Which apparantly was not even on their radar.
Maybe they could have got behind Maxine Waters or Pelosi when they sounded the alarm.
I guess letting it tank made for good media memes to blame anybody (Biden) but themselves.
And they wanna rule the country!!?
God help us all.
Naio
(165 posts)Always criticizing President Biden 😡
padah513
(2,496 posts)marble falls
(57,010 posts)... states like Florida, which received around $2 Billions and haven't distributed 2% of it. And there's a bunch of them like that. People are blaming the Fed, they need to be questioning their state governments. It's like the states want the interest from the billions hoping if this plan collapses that they can hold onto the money, anyway.
padah513
(2,496 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)Cinnamonspice
(163 posts)Pelosi claiming it just came up on them was lame.
Iggo
(47,534 posts)andym
(5,443 posts)it would have been filibustered by the GOP since they will side with the property owners=landlords. So what happened in the House does not matter.
Omaha Steve
(99,494 posts)This is AOC's opinion.
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.