In a First, U.S. Declares Shortage on Colorado River, Forcing Water Cuts
Source: New York Times
Lake Mead, top left, and Boulder City, Nev., in July. The last time the lake was anywhere near full was two decades ago.Credit...Patrick T. Fallon/Agence France-Presse Getty Images
With climate change and long-term drought continuing to take a toll on the Colorado River, the federal government on Monday for the first time declared a water shortage at Lake Mead, one of the rivers main reservoirs. The declaration triggers cuts in water supply that, for now, mostly will affect Arizona farmers. Beginning next year they will be cut off from much of the water they have relied on for decades. Much smaller reductions are mandated for Nevada and for Mexico across the southern border.
But larger cuts, affecting far more of the 40 million people in the West that rely on the river for at least part of their water supply, are likely in coming years as a warming climate continues to reduce how much water flows into the Colorado from rain and melting snow. As this inexorable-seeming decline in the supply continues, the shortages that were beginning to see implemented are only going to increase, said Jennifer Pitt, who directs the Colorado River program at the National Audubon Society. Once were on that train, its not clear where it stops.
The Bureau of Reclamation, an agency of the Interior Department, declared the shortage as it issued its latest outlook for the river for the next 24 months. That forecast showed that by the end of this year Lake Mead, the huge reservoir near Las Vegas, would reach a level of 1,066 feet above sea level. It hasnt seen a level that low since it began to fill after the completion of Hoover Dam in the 1930s. The lake will be at 34 percent of capacity.Todays announcement highlights the challenges we face in the Colorado River basin and elsewhere in the West, said Tanya Trujillo, assistant interior secretary for water and science.
Water levels at Lake Mead and the other large Colorado reservoir, Lake Powell, in Utah, have been falling for years, leaving a telltale white bathtub ring of mineral deposits along the shoreline as demand has outpaced supply. The mandatory cuts, referred to as Tier 1 reductions, are part of a contingency plan approved in 2019 after lengthy negotiations among the seven states that use Colorado River water: California, Nevada and Arizona in the lower basin, and New Mexico, Utah, Colorado and Wyoming in the upper basin. American Indian tribes and Mexican officials have also been involved in the planning.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/16/climate/colorado-river-water-cuts.html
bucolic_frolic
(43,142 posts)We are so unready for this
BumRushDaShow
(128,897 posts)with the excessive heat along the west coast, where there is normally a "wet season/dry season" type of climate, but not having much of a semblance of a "wet season" last fall/winter, just really made it worse.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)where the clowns in local government are approving development as fast as they can. They have big plans for even more massive subdivisions. The local aquifer is falling at a rapid rate and the area is warming fast. Trump is very popular here.
As I posted recently, since you can't deal with the developing crises of global warming and aridification by approving more development, praying, shooting, or building a wall--the standard coping mechanisms in the area--I remain doubtful that the "grow grow grow" dinosaurs running the place have any capacity whatsoever to deal with what's coming.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)In a dry dusty desert in the SW corner of Utah, the manager of an existing development is planning to double it in size now.
The place is known/advertised for its 13 golf clubs, "and we're gonna have twice as many now".
Water question comes up, of course. The guy explains "they" are "entitled" to water from the Colorado river, haven't even used as much as they have been "owed", so now they are gonna use more for the new planned development.
Question about desert and the continuing, increasing drought and lower river flows....doesn't matter.
He has water rights, by god, and he's gonna use them, way out here in the middle of smack dab nowhere in the desert.
"the courts will back us up".
apparently you can litigate your way out of a climate disaster, who knew?
The real answer to water use in the western drought-infested areas of the country is to charge the replacement cost of water to individuals and industry.
Figure out the cheapest way to ship in the water that someone uses from the cheapest source outside the drought zone, then charge them that much per gallon.
Companies aren't going to pay that amount so they'll downsize and look to move to non-drought areas.
Individuals will cut their water consumption as much as possible then a lot of them will move as the jobs "dry up".
Over the course of a few years, you'll reach the amount of industry and people who should exist in a drought-prone area. And there'll no longer be more water going out of reservoirs and rivers than come in.
State and local governments tend to treat water as being free when there's actually a cost to it, particularly in a long-term drought situation. And the governments continue to subsidize the use of water even when there's not enough to go around.
That's going to have to stop at some point.
(Yes, I live in a drought-prone area and yes, I live on a fixed income. But the governments around here decades ago built an insane number of huge reservoirs (lakes) which are tapped for water.)
not fooled
(5,801 posts)but the circle of connected insiders running this town keep making money from subsidized water, so they'll keep on keepin' on until the (almost) free ride ends. I call it "Easter Island Syndrome." I doubt most of them even acknowledge that global warming is real.
Eventually water availability will become a limiting factor, but not yet.